Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why has U.S. been spared?
Orlando Sentinel ^ | 08 July 2005 | Peter A. Brown

Posted on 07/08/2005 11:01:56 AM PDT by Lando Lincoln

The London bombing once again begs the question: Why haven't terrorists struck the United States in the past four years?

Certainly the effects of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks are still felt by Americans.

Unfortunately, terrorists have succeeded in changing how we live our daily lives.

Americans worry more about being blown up now than when thousands of Soviet ICBMs with multiple nuclear warheads were pointed at the United States.

These days, we live under the constant fear of being the next victim of a random act, a mentality that makes us more fearful and less generous to strangers and forces changes in behavior that cost us all time and money.

Nonetheless, it is useful to ponder why the bad guys haven't struck within the United States itself since 9-11.

It certainly is not because Osama & Co. hate us less than they once did.

(Excerpt) Read more at orlandosentinel.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: jihadinamerica; london; londonattack
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-195 next last
To: Alberta's Child

A deal?! We're killing Al Queda every day - what kind of deal would we have with UBL?


21 posted on 07/08/2005 11:12:49 AM PDT by wvobiwan (Liberal Slogan: "News maganizes don't kill people, Muslims do." - Ann Coulter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

I think the main reason is because Britain has allowed the Islamic Clerics in their country to incite Muslims in the country to terrorism against the UK non-mulsim population. The mayor of London himself, Livingston (?)has schmoozed these people for several months. Here in the US it is illegal for a preacher or anyone to incite someone to commit a terrorist act. E. G. a preacher advocating the killing of non-believers etc. We arrest people for this and have.


22 posted on 07/08/2005 11:12:50 AM PDT by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
Americans worry more about being blown up now than when...

BU11$#!+

I dont see any Americans afraid to fly, shop at the mall, ride subways, or enter high-rise buildings.

Americans are more afraid of pedophiles than terrorism (and rightly so).

23 posted on 07/08/2005 11:13:29 AM PDT by Optimist (I think I'm beginning to see a pattern here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void
Because we've aggressively pursued illegal aliens and controlled our borders?

That isn't it, obviously.

24 posted on 07/08/2005 11:13:57 AM PDT by Shalom Israel (Pray for the peace of Jerusalem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
I've wondered about this myself, and as each day goes by without any sign of Osama bin Laden I sometimes wonder if the U.S. hasn't reached out and cut a deal with him or his surrogates.

Whatever happened to the theory that Bush secretly made the ultimatum that if another attack occured in the United States, he'd nuke Mecca? I remember an article speculating that Bush would do what Israel secretly did to Egypt, that is, to let them know that if another attack occured, they'd blow up a dam that would flood half of Egypt in retaliation.

Jan. 7 2005: Has U.S. threatened to vaporize Mecca?

-PJ

25 posted on 07/08/2005 11:14:00 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Because they heard Bush was going to use a nuclear bomb on the senate. They want to wait for the damage reports on that before they decide their targets.


26 posted on 07/08/2005 11:14:29 AM PDT by umgud (Comment removed by poster before moderator could get to it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
I've wondered about this myself, and as each day goes by without any sign of Osama bin Laden I sometimes wonder if the U.S. hasn't reached out and cut a deal with him or his surrogates.

*************

What a despicable thing to say.

27 posted on 07/08/2005 11:15:18 AM PDT by trisham ("Live Free or Die," General John Stark, July 31, 1809)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Maybe we have. :)


28 posted on 07/08/2005 11:15:44 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

I would say we are not really "spared." We probably had citizens wounded or killed in London. Plus all our citizens abroad and are heroic service members are taking casualties in the war on terror.

Plus an attack on a ally like the U.K. is an attack on all of us.


29 posted on 07/08/2005 11:16:03 AM PDT by Reagan79 (Ralph Stanley Rocks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: umgud

*snrk* That works for me!


30 posted on 07/08/2005 11:16:03 AM PDT by null and void (You'll learn more on FR by accident, than other places by design)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Optimist

I'm more afraid of the ACLU and Supreme Court than terrorists. And they're more dangerous, too.


31 posted on 07/08/2005 11:16:33 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

Ain't sayin'...


32 posted on 07/08/2005 11:16:40 AM PDT by null and void (You'll learn more on FR by accident, than other places by design)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

Sounds like a plan to me!


33 posted on 07/08/2005 11:17:15 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
These days, we live under the constant fear of being the next victim of a random act, a mentality that makes us more fearful and less generous to strangers and forces changes in behavior that cost us all time and money

Is this sniveling weenie writing this while cowering in his basement or something. I don't know what he's talking about. I'm going golfing.

34 posted on 07/08/2005 11:17:38 AM PDT by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

Al Queda's plan was not to attack the US-yet. They're out to effect public opinion in other countries that have allied with the US in their efforts against the jihadists. Those countries are more suseptable to these attacks. Their focus was to be Spain, Britain and Poland as per AQ docs captured by the Norwegians. The follow up attacks after success elsewhere is to be the US.


35 posted on 07/08/2005 11:17:45 AM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
Everyone is forgetting who the REAL enemy is.

Xenu, the leader of the Galactic Federation, solved an overpopulation problem by freezing excess people in a compound of alcohol and glycol and transporting them to Teegeeack -- which we now know as Earth. There they were put in volcanos and exploded with hydrogen bombs.

Xenu's return will wipe out all life as we know it. Scientology is our only hope.

/sarcasm off

36 posted on 07/08/2005 11:18:13 AM PDT by BipolarBob (Yes I backed over the vampire, but I swear I didn't see it in my rearview mirror.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln
If NYNY was hit like London GWB may have bombed Tehran or Mecca and unleashed the dogs of war. What happened in London was not a knockout blow but a painful lesson. The Muslims want to inflict a killing blow to the western, Christian culture and they will as soon as they obtain several working thermonuclear devices.

We need to kill them before they kill us as killing us is exactly what they are publicly proclaiming.
37 posted on 07/08/2005 11:18:43 AM PDT by Final Authority
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: andyk

Me too was in HS in the eighties.

I remember the threat of the Russians well.


38 posted on 07/08/2005 11:19:02 AM PDT by in hoc signo vinces ("Soylent Green is People!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Lando Lincoln

They're going for the soft underbelly of Europe. It sounds like a contradiction, but evil, in general, despises weakness.


39 posted on 07/08/2005 11:19:22 AM PDT by Rutles4Ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

America isn't being spared...its simply a tougher land to organize and enter. But that won't last forever. These Saudi nuts have the funding to play this game out. There is no doubt that they will eventually figure out a way to enter and a way to creat a threat to America. They can even cause havoc by just bombing American businesses in Europe if they really get desperate.


40 posted on 07/08/2005 11:19:58 AM PDT by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-195 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson