Some tell me again why we even bother defending these cretins?
1 posted on
07/08/2005 8:14:10 AM PDT by
Paul Ross
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
To: Paul Ross
SEOUL President Roh Moo Hyun declared Thursday that under no circumstances would South Korea allow the United States to resort to a military attack against North Korea. Under no circumstances??
Then why are we spending billions of tax paid money to protect them from North Korea? Fortress America sounds better and better.
In light of this statement, it's time to leave.
To: Paul Ross
SEOUL President Roh Moo Hyun declared Thursday that under no circumstances would South Korea allow the United States to resort to a military attack against North Korea. COOL!
That means we can just up and leave the South Korean IDIOTS, and AFTER Kim Jong Il CONQUERS the South, we can attack with Impugnity ALL the cities!
There are soldiers atationed on the DMZ that would LOVE to get the "F" outta there!
Also, we can cut off all Imports from S. Korea, as it will VERY soon after the pullout become N. Korea South, and we can nationalize all the South Korean companies and assets in the US!
Gee, this is FUN, and profitable....cool!
Start the return NOW!
109 posted on
07/08/2005 10:48:07 AM PDT by
Itzlzha
("The avalanche has already started...it is too late for the pebbles to vote")
To: Paul Ross
"Why is ererybody so @#$%^&* stuupid? Why can't peopre be more interrigent, rike me?" Kim Jong Il - Team America
Somehow, the quote seems to apply to SK in this case.
110 posted on
07/08/2005 10:56:34 AM PDT by
Magnum44
(Terrorism is a disease, precise application of superior force is the ONLY cure)
To: Paul Ross
Pull our troops out of South Korea and expel the South Korean ambassador and embassy personnel. Now!
112 posted on
07/08/2005 11:03:05 AM PDT by
Little Ray
(I'm a reactionary, hirsute, gun-owning, knuckle dragging, Christian Neanderthal and proud of it!)
To: Paul Ross
Okay, S Kor obviously doesn't need our troops. Maybe Japan would be a better choice for neutralizing N Kor.
118 posted on
07/08/2005 11:26:14 AM PDT by
RightWhale
(withdraw from the 1967 UN Outer Space Treaty)
To: Paul Ross
someone tell me why are we there? why do we care about S Korea?
122 posted on
07/08/2005 11:36:59 AM PDT by
Tiger Smack
(www.tigersmack.com <------- for LSU & SEC sports/news/stuff)
To: Paul Ross
I guess we should just pack up and go home then, huh?
123 posted on
07/08/2005 11:38:06 AM PDT by
Junior
(“Even if you are one-in-a-million, there are still 6,000 others just like you.”)
To: Paul Ross
Time to change South Korea's designation from "Ally" to "down range". If I were "W", I'd not only pull out all the troops, but I'd dig up any Americans soldiers buried there, buy the MacArthur statue in the peace park, and bring it all home. And when the last unit left, I'd leave a big "WELCOME" mat, written in Korean, at the DMZ wire [where I worked in the 3/ 23rd Inf. in '68-'69].
130 posted on
07/08/2005 12:00:37 PM PDT by
PzLdr
("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
To: Paul Ross
#1
i agree.
they've got it every way: they sell their products to us at profit,
and they've got our military at our expense protecting them,
but they can make anti-american threats.
132 posted on
07/08/2005 12:12:47 PM PDT by
ken21
(it takes a village to brainwash your child + to steal your property! /s)
Roh Moo Hyun is Hangul for Dick Durbin.
133 posted on
07/08/2005 12:15:09 PM PDT by
jayhorn
(when i hit the drum, you shake the booty.)
To: Paul Ross
We need to get outta there NOW!
136 posted on
07/08/2005 1:05:23 PM PDT by
BnBlFlag
(Deo Vindice/Semper Fidelis)
To: Paul Ross
Orders should have gone out from the Pentagon for all United States troops stationed in South Korea to begin packing for withdrawal immediately.Soon as the S.K. President made that statement and he should have been informed by the highest level oficial that the United States will from this day on regard what happens between N.K. and S. K. as an internal matter.
138 posted on
07/08/2005 1:21:49 PM PDT by
sport
To: Paul Ross
Anyone who thinks we should pull out of South Korea just doesn't understand the situation.
We are not there just to defend South Korea. - South Korea has long been able to win a conventional war with the North. Their defense budget dwarfs the the North's. Though the North out numbers the South 2 to 1 in term of standing army, the are much more poorly trained and equipped than the South. A lot of the North's tanks are immobile and much of their air force is in disrepair. It would take a heavy toll on the South, but few doubt that South Korea would win a conventional war with the North. Therefore, our main contribution to South Korea's defense is our nuclear umbrella, not ground troops.
The reason we are there is to oppose the North. North Korea would be a threat to our security even without the South. South Korea is the perfect place to keep troops to oppose the North and make sure that our interests in the region are protected and represented physically on the ground. The USFK give us credibility (i.e. it is a visible sign of our commitment--you can't see a nuclear umbrella) in a region vital to our economy and security though geographically remote from us.
Having forces on the Korean peninsula is also crucial to security strategy in the Far East as a whole. The peninsula has always been the lynch pin to the region. It borders Japan, China and Russia. All three of the countries are hugely important to our national interests. Out forces in South Korea put us right in the middle of the region. If China becomes hostile, we have military bases a very short air flight away from their industrial region. Bases in South Korea give us options and leverage in the Far East as a whole.
When you throw in our large economic ties with South Korea (anyone own a Samsung cell phone?) and the fact that there are usually 50,000 American civilians in South Korea--most of them in Seoul--the picture is clear that we cannot leave South Korea. It would be tantamount to shirking our nation's duty to protect our citizens lives and livelihoods.
140 posted on
07/08/2005 1:24:35 PM PDT by
Stag_Man
(Hamilton is my Hero)
To: Paul Ross
ROTFLMAO!
155 posted on
07/08/2005 3:04:13 PM PDT by
Hunble
To: Paul Ross
South Korea?
Since when Roh spoke for all of SK?
Democracy in action
165 posted on
07/08/2005 4:48:05 PM PDT by
JudgemAll
(Condemn me, make me naked and kill me, or be silent for ever on my gun ownership and law enforcement)
To: Paul Ross
From the Article: ...under no circumstances would South Korea allow the United States to resort to a military attack against North Korea.
-----
Thus proving once again the old saying: "Blood is Thicker than Water"
166 posted on
07/08/2005 5:01:43 PM PDT by
gooleyman
( What about the baby's "RIGHT TO CHOOSE"?????? I bet the baby would chose LIFE.)
To: Paul Ross
Roh, the best thing for you to do is to stay out of our way.
167 posted on
07/08/2005 5:07:40 PM PDT by
Paul_Denton
(Get the U.N. out of the U.S. and U.S. out of the U.N.!)
To: Paul Ross
Dear Roh Moo, the whishing sounds over your head are American nuc's travelling inbound to your ronery cuz up north. You might want to duck, then follow the green glow to unify.
168 posted on
07/08/2005 5:07:49 PM PDT by
TADSLOS
(Right Wing Infidel since 1954)
To: Paul Ross
South Korea's Gen X'ers sincerely believe the'll be "reunified" with "Pol Pot" Jong Il in a spirit of joyous brotherly love.
The recent histories of Vietnam and Cambodia don't seem to phase them.
So let them have their bloodbath.
181 posted on
07/08/2005 7:52:54 PM PDT by
angkor
To: Paul Ross
184 posted on
07/09/2005 12:57:22 AM PDT by
Ronin
(When the fox gnaws.... SMILE!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson