Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/08/2005 3:22:21 AM PDT by familyop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: familyop
that as long as Britain guarantees a degree of freedom to the likes of Hassan Butt [an overtly pro-terrorist Islamist], the terrorist strikes will continue to be planned

Add this to the NWW file:

"Names Wot Work."

2 posted on 07/08/2005 3:38:59 AM PDT by Lazamataz (Looks like the Supreme Court wants to play Cowboys and Homeowners.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: familyop
“When a bomb attack happens here, I won’t be against it, even if it kills my own children. … But it is against Islam for me to engage personally in acts of terrorism in the UK because I live here.

God (Jehovah, not Allah), what a hypocrite. So I can stand here and passively encourage terrorism by saying out loud that I accept it, but because I live well, I won't actually participate. This guy needs to be on the next flight back to the sandy hell that he came from.

3 posted on 07/08/2005 3:42:14 AM PDT by Hardastarboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: familyop
See also EXCLUSIVE: UK Spy Identifies Groups and People Behind London Bombings
4 posted on 07/08/2005 3:47:17 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: familyop
what sick twisted convoluted rhetoric spews from the mouth ....England was never their land to begin with, it was not an Islamic Nation, it is a democratic free society and if they're immigrating to it they need to conform to it.

WORLD, look at what this man is saying! But in January 2005, Omar Bakri Mohammed determined that the covenant of security had ended for British Muslims because of post-9/11 anti-terrorist legislation that meant “the whole of Britain has become Dar ul-Harb [the Abode of War, the territory open for Muslim conquest].” Therefore, “the kuffar [unbelievers] has no sanctity for their own life or property.”

Anti-terrorist legislation, not anti-muslim. If he is finding himself falling under the legislation or his followers then he should realize he is outside the law of the land. And the people of Britain should realize that this is a spokesman for the Nation of Islam within their own borders. The enemy has inflitrated their lands and yesterdays bombings are but a calling card. Europe must choose to go to war with the Nation of Islam or submit to it.

5 posted on 07/08/2005 3:52:26 AM PDT by EBH (Never give-up, Never give-in, and Never Forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: familyop
Bakri said his definition of Britain as Dar ul-Harb was “theoretical” and he provided a non-bellicose re-interpretation:

That's what moderate muslims say to the filthy kuffar. And theoretically, they are going to kill all non-believers until Islam dominates the world...theoretically, that is.

8 posted on 07/08/2005 4:26:40 AM PDT by Dark Skies
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: familyop

These assholes should be declared "In Season"...No bag limit, shooting over baited fields okay, and a bounty on all turned into the authorities...


Semper Fi


9 posted on 07/08/2005 4:28:39 AM PDT by river rat (You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: familyop
"But in January 2005, Omar Bakri Mohammed determined that the covenant of security had ended for British Muslims because of post-9/11 anti-terrorist legislation that meant “the whole of Britain has become Dar ul-Harb [the Abode of War, the territory open for Muslim conquest].” Therefore, “the kuffar [unbelievers] has no sanctity for their own life or property.”

American Muslims have determined that the covenant of security here has been dissolved by the Patriot Act. What the covenant of security means is very simple. If they have the ability to promote terroristic acts and the overthrow of a country by Islam while living in that country and being protected by its laws, then they have a covenant. Once that country discovers what they have been up to and enacts laws that disrupt their agenda, the covenant is broken.

This is why Islam is dangerous. Muhammed was an opportunist who presented "religious" law to his followers and then altered it at whim to suit his agenda. That he did this tells Muslims that they can do the same. They can tell you anything they think you want to hear today, then change it or deny it the following day if doing so enhances their agenda.

11 posted on 07/08/2005 5:22:33 AM PDT by sageb1 (This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Yehuda; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; ...
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

..........................................

12 posted on 07/08/2005 5:38:07 AM PDT by SJackson (On the second try, I got that jug off, but then I had a bear tied to a tree)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: familyop
We hear it time after time, "the life of a non believer has no value" or "we will rule the west" or "we will rule Britain and America." I don't believe there are innocent Muslims. There are Muslims that commit terrorist acts, there are those that give them physical and financial support to carry out these attacks, there are those that know who is doing these terrorists acts but protect them and then there are those who secretly take pride in these attacks.

Our elected leaders live in their ivory towers immune from these attacks and immune to the outcry of their citizens against these attacks, and they can only wring their hands and talk to TROP and warn against hate crimes against people that want us dead.

I don't want to see people hurt or killed, but IMO if there are two or three attacks on the scale of 9/11 there will be a day of reckoning throughout this country and there will be nothing the government can do to stop it.if we are every hit
14 posted on 07/08/2005 5:51:14 AM PDT by Americanexpat (A strong democracy through citizen oversight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: familyop

16 posted on 07/08/2005 6:31:28 AM PDT by rhema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson