[kristinn]

Even though there are buts and on the other hand graphs in this story, the thrust and headline could have been been written by the bombers themselves.

[Altair333]

Blair is in his final term of office- no need to worry about voters anymore.

[Principled]

neville chamberlin lives

[LittleJohnnyEdwards]

This is scary I don't know how were ever going to win.

[Brilliant]

The terrorists thought they were maximizing the impact by doing this during the G8 summit, but in fact, that was a stupid idea.

The photo of Blair standing in front of Bush and Chirac, and the other leaders was a pretty defiant scene.

[Dr.Hilarious]

Mr. Blair had finally reaped the bitter harvest of the war on terrorism

Only a thug could frame this situation that way.

[conservativecorner]

I think He and the Brits did fantastic today, and we the Americans stand with them. It's so blatantly obvious that this isn't journalism so much as a wish.

[oceanview]

its still an open question as to which way the British people will go. I know that sounds pessimistic, but I believe it. after an intial period of "stand tall" that will follow this attack, the daily drumbeat of this message in the media will have an effect on UK public opinion.

[Pistolshot]

Simplest answer to all of this. Take off the gloves. Terrorize the terrorists.
When is the rest of the limp-wristed press going to realize that appeasment will only strengthen the resolve of the terrorists to do more damage? Or are they in support of them?
Time to take off the gloves and show these camel-riding goat-herders how to fight dirty. The US has ALWAYS been the best at that when given the green light.

Time to show it.

[Zacs Mom]

[okie01]

There are defeatists at the New York Times?

And they're trying to give up already, for the British?

Perhaps, they do better to volunteer their services to Paris...

[crazyhorse691]

I could tell it was from the NYSlimes and not the Islamofascist News. There was punctuation.

[kristinn]

How queer, the headline at The NY Times for this article has been changed to: Blair's Rising Star Runs Into a Treacherous Future

[etcetera]

Trust the NY Times to bend over for the bombers. Now's not the time to get all weepy. Now you start talking defiance. Now you rise up and start punching back. But not the NY Times.

[petertare]

I thought that group shot of the G8 gang looked like a bunched of kicked in the teeth cowed wimps. I heard no strong rhetoric confirming that the usual suspect muslim mad dogs would be hunted down and drowned. No determination, just lots of feelings and compassion and aint it just a pity so many innocents had to die, wah wah.

Well at least they issued the usual non-statements and pc rhetoric--too bad the appeasing frenchy surrender monkeys were not out front to invoke a really inspired and resolute confidence in these airbags.

More of the same group lets look the other way guys!

[syriacus]

Today the NY Times blames Blair. Tomorrow or the next day, they will revert to their old selves and will go back to blaming Bush for everything.

[Freedom of Speech Wins]

As if being the cowards the Democrats want them to be would have prevented the attacks.

Isn't Galloway the guy implicated in funnelling money to the terrorists?

New hero for the left.

Along with the suicide bombers who allow them to lecture Blair.

[tdewey10]

The New York Times is evil.

[ABG(anybody but Gore)]

Anybody have a link to the editor a**holes at the NY Times, and another link to Tony Blair to lend him our support?

[vpintheak]

Galloway and people that think like him are the whale turds on the bottom of the ocean. They are the dumbest bunch of SOB's I have ever witnessed. 100% pure intellectuall idiots. And that is just assuming they are just stupid.

[Eva]

This was the line of drivel that was laid out in the pre dawn hours by the Daily Kos. I have heard it repeated over and over by idiots on the tv news. I knew that it was meant to be the daily talking points for the Democrats.