I did a search and didn't find this title. At any rate, this is required reading. Abuse of power is THE reason we don't want another Clinton in the White House, but sadly it is the least understood. This article, for the most part, makes the argument quite well.
The reason for the qualifying "for the most part" is that there's no mention of the Clinton Justice Department's harrassment of The American Spectator. That aside, there's plenty of good evidence presented.
1 posted on
07/07/2005 10:11:43 AM PDT by
murdoog
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: murdoog
2 posted on
07/07/2005 10:17:03 AM PDT by
TheOtherOne
(The scales of Justice are unbalanced.™)
To: murdoog
This article sounds like it is from Hillary's Secret War by Richard Poe, published in 2004. If so, it includes many references to Jim Robinson and the early days of FreeRepublic.com. The poster is correct. It is required reading.
To: murdoog
4 posted on
07/07/2005 10:19:33 AM PDT by
doug from upland
(The Hillary documentary is coming)
To: murdoog
I especially appreciate the moderate tone and style of this article -- no rapid attack dog fangs -- which actually makes the facts of the article stick.
5 posted on
07/07/2005 10:24:35 AM PDT by
Californiajones
("The apprehension of beauty is the cure for apathy" - Thomas Aquinas)
To: murdoog
6 posted on
07/07/2005 10:27:08 AM PDT by
DBrow
To: murdoog
... Mainstream Republicans have proved just as reluctant as mainstream Democrats to look deeply into the secrets of Mena airport....
This is the most important line in the story.
There's a reason for this.
To: murdoog
Did the Clinton hacks also go after the Centre for Western Journalism (Worldnetdaily)?
8 posted on
07/07/2005 10:28:50 AM PDT by
Joan912
(mmmmm....pineapple)
To: murdoog; Jim Robinson
Some may view this post as off topic, but...
God bless you Mr. Robinson.
5.56mm
11 posted on
07/07/2005 10:43:56 AM PDT by
M Kehoe
To: murdoog
13 posted on
07/07/2005 11:32:41 AM PDT by
hattend
(Alaska....in a time warp all it's own!)
To: murdoog
15 posted on
07/07/2005 12:13:07 PM PDT by
Pagey
(Whether Hillary Clintons' attacks on America are a success or a failure depends upon YOU TOO!)
To: murdoog
17 posted on
07/07/2005 12:38:28 PM PDT by
tubebender
(Growing old is mandatory...Growing up is optional)
To: murdoog
"How Clintons took control of federal law enforcement."
The DA Massacre...Clinton's firing of all US Attorneys, followed by his replacement of all the Inspector General positions with the federal government, pretty much guaranteed that Clinton wouldn't get convicted of anything.
When you throw in such trivial positions as those within the Travel Office...as they destroyed Billy Dale, it was obvious that they were not going to leave any stone unturned.
From the DEA to his attempted appointment of a criminal to the highest law enforcement position in this country (Web Hubbel/AG), Clinton created one of the most impregnable walls in modern US history...without a peep from this media; the same media that has the nerve to call the Bush administration the most secretive.
18 posted on
07/07/2005 5:13:35 PM PDT by
cwb
To: murdoog
Funny how we never heard of any of this crap, but Bush gets accused of things he didn't even do.
20 posted on
07/07/2005 6:09:05 PM PDT by
satchmodog9
(Murder and weather are our only news)
To: murdoog
The first phase of the Clinton coup came on March 23, 1993. Only 11 days after becoming attorney general, Janet Reno called her first press conference to announce that she was firing all 93 U.S. attorneys and replacing them with Clinton loyalists.Just imagine the media's reaction to this outrageous move if it has been done by George Bush! They would have freaked and demanded he be impeached.
Richard Nixon left office in disgrace for so much less than the things these two despicable creatures did in one day!
To: murdoog
Hey murdoog:
I think with the London bombings a lot of people missed this.
I found it over at WND and searched and came up with your post.
Maybe it should be reposted again...
Great read.
To: murdoog
To: murdoog
Phase 3 of the Clinton coup finished the job. The Clintons proceeded to defang the federal judiciary. Between 1994 and 1998, they appointed seven new judges to the U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. all Clinton cronies. The new appointees nicknamed themselves the "Magnificent Seven" a name that stuck until the Clintons appointed an eighth member to the team in 1998. And that may be why Judge Brown is needed in that court, and may be skipped for the Supreme.
28 posted on
07/12/2005 6:00:07 PM PDT by
bvw
To: murdoog
GGrrrrr, this is making my skin crawl and blood boil, much the same way I felt while reading "Unlimited Access" by the former FBI fellow, Gary Aldrich.
After reading stuff like this, you feel so....violated.
29 posted on
07/12/2005 6:07:34 PM PDT by
kstewskis
("I don't know what I know, but I know that it's big..." Jerry Fletcher)
To: murdoog
The reason for the qualifying "for the most part" is that there's no mention of the Clinton Justice Department's harrassment of The American Spectator
. That aside, there's plenty of good evidence presented. The other point he missed is that the dismissal of all 93 United States Attorneys was closely proximate to, and obviously intended to relieve the pressure from, pending referrals from the Resolution Trust Corporation to the United States Attorney in Little Rock concerning RTC's investigation of the collapse of Madison Guaranty, which was an Arkansas politicans' honeypot, when it was under the "management" of Jim and Susan Macdougal.
To: murdoog
32 posted on
07/13/2005 5:09:47 PM PDT by
kcvl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson