Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Man Charged With Stealing Wi-Fi Signal
yahoo! news ^ | Wed Jul 6, 8:15 PM ET

Posted on 07/07/2005 5:02:32 AM PDT by blackeagle

ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. - Police have arrested a man for using someone else's wireless Internet network in one of the first criminal cases involving this fairly common practice.

ADVERTISEMENT

Benjamin Smith III, 41, faces a pretrial hearing this month following his April arrest on charges of unauthorized access to a computer network, a third-degree felony.

Police say Smith admitted using the Wi-Fi signal from the home of Richard Dinon, who had noticed Smith sitting in an SUV outside Dinon's house using a laptop computer.

The practice is so new that the Florida Department of Law Enforcement doesn't even keep statistics, according to the St. Petersburg Times, which reported Smith's arrest this week.

Innocuous use of other people's unsecured Wi-Fi networks is common, though experts say that plenty of illegal use also goes undetected: such as people sneaking on others' networks to traffic in child pornography, steal credit card information and send death threats.

Security experts say people can prevent such access by turning on encryption or requiring passwords, but few bother or are unsure how to do so.

Wi-Fi, short for Wireless Fidelity, has enjoyed prolific growth since 2000. Millions of households have set up wireless home networks that give people like Dinon the ability to use the Web from their backyards but also reach the house next door or down the street.

It's not clear why Smith was using Dinon's network. Prosecutors declined to comment, and a working phone number could not be located for Smith.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: internet; theft; wifi; wireless
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
To: VRWCmember

Sitting in a condo, watching it rain


21 posted on 07/07/2005 6:24:45 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
You can traceroute back to your location to see where it is: http://www.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/nph-traceroute.pl
22 posted on 07/07/2005 6:24:49 AM PDT by palmer (If you see flies at the entrance to the burrow, the ground hog is probably inside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: thebaron512
If You don't bother to lock down your front door, then you should have no right to bitch if someone is using your house.
23 posted on 07/07/2005 6:25:23 AM PDT by Bear_Slayer (DOC - 81mm Mortars, Wpns Co. 2/3 KMCAS 86-89)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: blackeagle

Interesting. Thanks for posting.


24 posted on 07/07/2005 6:25:51 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

"My dsl modem went down briefly for some reason and my laptop tried to jump onto my neighbor's network. I practically had to wrestle it to the ground to keep it from logging on. Apparently windows xp is like a cat in heat and will hook up with any wireless network it can sniff."

I have the exact same problem at our condo in florida.


25 posted on 07/07/2005 6:28:49 AM PDT by strange1 ("Show the enemy harm so he shall not advance" Sun Tzu The Art of War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Ramius; HairOfTheDog

Interesting. I would compare this to walking into an unlocked neighbor's house where the door is wide open. Might be trespassing, but it ain't breaking and entering.

Back when I was using a wireless router, I had the encryption enabled to prevent this kind of thing. Just like we keep our front gate locked.

If you don't want someone using your network, lock it!


26 posted on 07/07/2005 6:30:53 AM PDT by ecurbh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: palmer

Interesting but it told me nothing. Kinda like a Mark Warner speech.


27 posted on 07/07/2005 6:32:46 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
When all else fails, consult the manual.

Ewwww!

28 posted on 07/07/2005 6:33:26 AM PDT by N. Theknow (If Social Security is so good - why aren't members of Congress in it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

Agreed.

I have the same problem when I start up my computer - it tries to logon to my neighbors wireless instead of mine. I've had to change the properties of my connections to not logon automatically.


29 posted on 07/07/2005 6:34:20 AM PDT by Dashing Dasher (I can resist everything except temptation. -- Oscar Wilde.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ecurbh

None of the analogies apply. It's more like offering a telephone in a condo and expecting people to NOT use it. I did NOTHING to access the signal. It was simply there.

I think it is the restaurant across the lot. It's a bad signal.


30 posted on 07/07/2005 6:35:04 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
As you can see, we have much work to do in just two short days. It is my hope that the best practices, ideas and momentum that we each carry back to our states at the end of the Summit, will collectively push high school redesign over the tipping point. We simply can't wait any longer.

http://www.nga.org/nga/legislativeUpdate/1,1169,C_ISSUE_BRIEF%5ED_7993,00.html

31 posted on 07/07/2005 6:36:34 AM PDT by palmer (If you see flies at the entrance to the burrow, the ground hog is probably inside)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets

Bump!


32 posted on 07/07/2005 6:36:52 AM PDT by ConservativeMan55 (DON'T FIRE UNTIL YOU SEE THE WHITES OF THE CURTAINS THEY ARE WEARING ON THEIR HEADS !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: PGalt

I have read articles where some people keep a port open to allow wifi access to such individuals in need.

As for the likening this to going into an unlocked house, that is a bad comparison. The airwaves are owned by the people. If I use a walkie talkie I can expect no privacy for my conversation. If you use a wireless access point/router and do not lock it down, you are emmitting a signal into the public airwaves and inviting others to piggyback onto your network to get to the internet.

Now all that said, using this access to break fraud, pornography or mischief laws is unacceptable and should be punished.

I found this access to be available by accident. I had my laptop in the car and noticed I had a signal so I checked my mail and then got directions. It's unreliable to think you will find access when you want it so it is not part of my routine, but I know it's out there.


33 posted on 07/07/2005 6:38:14 AM PDT by Edison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: strange1

"I have the exact same problem at our condo in florida."

I had the same problem in my old office. I kept picking up the signal of a local bank some 3 blocks away.


34 posted on 07/07/2005 6:39:24 AM PDT by politicalwit (USA...A Nation of Selective Law Enforcement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: melbell
That sounds just as intelligent as saying that if someone doesn't lock their car then they have no right to be upset if someone steals it.

Bad analogy, because in the one case you lose your car, in the other case you lose nothing.

A better analogy would be a private road with no gate and no sign. If people drive on it, is it trespassing? Does it matter whether the drivers should have known it was a private road?

35 posted on 07/07/2005 7:03:19 AM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
Bad analogy, because in the one case you lose your car, in the other case you lose nothing.

Sure you do - time, if nothing else. If you and I are splitting my bandwidth, my online activities now take twice as long as they would have otherwise. As well, your garden-variety wardriver is almost certainly not an authorized user of the ISP's resources, and hence is receiving a service he is not entitled to receive.

36 posted on 07/07/2005 7:22:36 AM PDT by general_re ("Frantic orthodoxy is never rooted in faith, but in doubt." - Reinhold Niebuhr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: general_re
If you and I are splitting my bandwidth, my online activities now take twice as long as they would have otherwise.

Almost nobody saturates their bandwidth like that. Unless both the wardriver and you are continuously transferring large files, you're unlikely to notice any performance hit.

As well, your garden-variety wardriver is almost certainly not an authorized user of the ISP's resources, and hence is receiving a service he is not entitled to receive.

That's the real issue. It's similar to the Napster argument: for each person who puts 1000 albums on his laptop, a record company claims a $20,000 loss, because that's what it would have cost to buy all that music at retail prices. But that's not quite right, either, because most of the music available on the internet is clearly stolen, whereas many of the "promiscuous" wireless ports are intended for use by the public, and there's no way to distinguish public from private.

37 posted on 07/07/2005 7:56:46 AM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: dawn53

Bump for a later reference/read.


38 posted on 07/07/2005 8:14:06 AM PDT by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
Unless both the wardriver and you are continuously transferring large files, you're unlikely to notice any performance hit.

If I'm not home at the time, I'm unlikely to notice that you've come in and spent some time watching my TV - that doesn't make it okay to do, though.

But that's not quite right, either, because most of the music available on the internet is clearly stolen, whereas many of the "promiscuous" wireless ports are intended for use by the public, and there's no way to distinguish public from private.

Err on the side of caution, I suppose. The question is whether he reasonably believed that this WAP was intended to be freely available to the public. Opinions on that will vary, I imagine :)

39 posted on 07/07/2005 9:42:06 AM PDT by general_re ("Frantic orthodoxy is never rooted in faith, but in doubt." - Reinhold Niebuhr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: general_re
If I'm not home at the time, I'm unlikely to notice that you've come in and spent some time watching my TV - that doesn't make it okay to do, though.

Correct. Physically entering your home is clearly trespassing.

Now, let's suppose you are at home watching HBO, and someone is watching your big-screen TV from the public sidewalk, and listening to it blare through your bay window, is that OK? He knew he didn't have your permission. He doesn't pay the HBO subscription fee, through which the studio gets royalties. Is he a thief, a trespasser, a loiterer, or merely another libertarian swinging his fist past the tip of your nose?

I'm not trying to win points off you AndrewC-style; I think this really is a grey area, both legally and morally. I'm of two minds as to whether the perp deserves punishment for this.

40 posted on 07/07/2005 10:00:34 AM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson