Posted on 07/06/2005 12:37:57 PM PDT by The_Eaglet
No offense, but it's hard to take your comment seriously when you are confusing the terms "nominate" and "elect".
I'm concerned he'll nominate GOnzales but don't really think he will.
Reason-he has always surprised us. Think about who he nominated to his cabinet-almost no one at FR got it right.
"Phillips concluded: "Roy Moore is the best choice that President Bush could make."
Oh yeh....Roy Moore would set off bigtime fireworks.... I say go for it. Let the Dim'Rats go bananas over this one. Screw 'em. The American people would see such a hellish attack that the faces of evil will be exposed to all. Christianity would be attacked so viciously that a blowback would occur and inspire the base bigtime. I would love and pray to see Roy Moore appointed SCOTUS. Never say Never.
You got that right.
Everyone in DC (on both sides of the aisle) heads' would explode or start spinning around (a la Linda Blair in the Exorcist).
No matter whether you think Judge Moor was a grandstander of principled Christian conservative, he'd be lucky to get 42 votes for confirmation. The battle for his confirmation would destroy the GOP.
Howard Phillips, try again please.
It's pretty scary that that is very interesting to him...
If you're going to do that, then why not nominate Limbaugh or Levin?
It would just be nice if conservative leaders had the character and integrity to tell the truth about George W. Bush. If Bush were really the genuine conservative that he is made out to be, there would truly be no reason to try and bombard the White House with letters and phone calls. If Bush were a true conservative, could he not be trusted to do the right thing on such a monumentally important decision?
Good point. But, Bush and the Republicans ought to know what group of people -- conservatives -- elected them and realize that future election victories depend on making thier base happy. I have no problem reminding them of this fact as many times as is necessary.
Failure to nominate a Scalia-like, originalist judge will bring the most catastrophic consquences the Republican party has seen since Watergate.
Yeah, it is. Also, his defense of the Att'y Gen'l was too personal and invites some attack.
Gonzales: That's Spanish for "Souter."
LOL!
No, I agree with you, actually. I meant conservative in the judicial sense not the political sense.
Howard Phillips obviously doesn't live in Alabama.
But I think he would be a great choice if it wasn't for that little detail
I want a person who believes in the Constitution. I don't think that Roy Moore is that person.
I just heard on the radio that president Bush took a bad spill on his bike, a police officer was also hurt.
it's funny, you hear the screeching of the brakes, your eyes are a little squinted, hands ready to block your face because you know it's coming...
it's just which side is gonna be more pissed....
If you believe in billion dollar lawsuits, then you believe in Moore justice.
And to be honest, Moore is not interested in the United States Supreme Court. This whole thing has been an exercise designed to allow Moore to play the role of "crusader" when he declares for Governor.
It's just a shame that so many people can't see through him.
Or me. I guaranty you I'll vote to overturn Roe, and half the other cases written in the last 40 years.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.