Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SEN. SCHUMER CAUGHT ON CELLPHONE: 'WE ARE GOING TO WAR' OVER SUPREME COURT
The Drudge Report ^ | 07/06/05 | Drudge Report

Posted on 07/06/2005 9:00:58 AM PDT by MikeA

**Exclusive**

Senate Judiciary Committee member Chuck Schumer got busy plotting away on the cellphone aboard a Washington, DC-New York Amtrak -- plotting Democrat strategy for the upcoming Supreme Court battle.

Schumer promised a fight over whoever the President’s nominee was: “It's not about an individual judge… It's about how it affects the overall makeup of the court.”

The chairman of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee was overheard on a long cellphone conversation with an unknown political ally, and the DRUDGE REPORT was there!

Schumer proudly declared: “We are contemplating how we are going to go to war over this.”

Schumer went on to say how hard it was to predict how a Supreme Court justice would turn out: “Even William Rehnquist is more moderate than they expected. The only ones that resulted how they predicted were [Antonin] Scalia and [Ruth Bader] Ginsburg. So most of the time they've gotten their picks wrong, and that's what we want to do to them again.”

Schumer later went on to mock the “Gang of 14” judicial filibuster deal and said it wasn’t relevant in the Supreme Court debate.

“A Priscilla Owen or Janice Rogers Brown style appointment may not have been extraordinary to the appellate court but may be extraordinary to the Supreme Court.”

By the time the train hit New Jersey, Schumer shifted gears and called his friend and “Gang of 14” member, Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham.

The two talked in a very friendly manner about doing an event sometime this week together.

Developing…


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109thkillsamerica; 2006; 2006elections; bushglobalist; bushnominee; doasearchfirst; dupe; fristmustgo; pubswillcave; senate; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: MikeA

I phoned Graham's office. They know about this.


21 posted on 07/06/2005 9:13:03 AM PDT by doug from upland (The Hillary documentary is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeA

WE CAN COUNT ON THE MAIN STREAM MEDIA TO HELP THE DEMOCRATS ON THIS ISSUE.


22 posted on 07/06/2005 9:13:43 AM PDT by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeA

RUSH on it right now.


23 posted on 07/06/2005 9:14:22 AM PDT by mware ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche........ "Nope, you are"-- GOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
Interesting too that he's calling his good friend Lyndsay Graham.

Birds of a feather.

24 posted on 07/06/2005 9:15:07 AM PDT by OldFriend (MERCY TO THE GUILTY IS CRUELTY TO THE INNOCENT ~ Adam Smith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: capt. norm
The bad news is that repeating what you intercept from someone else's cell call is against federal law.

Not if the intercepting device is your ear vs. an electronic device.

25 posted on 07/06/2005 9:15:27 AM PDT by Phantom Lord (Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

What was Graham's reaction to this story?


26 posted on 07/06/2005 9:15:42 AM PDT by OldFriend (MERCY TO THE GUILTY IS CRUELTY TO THE INNOCENT ~ Adam Smith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: capt. norm

Actually, just monitoring (electronically) a cellphone conversation is against the law--that's why all of the scanners produced since the late 80's have the cellphone frequencies blocked. The 1986 ECPA made it illegal to listen to cellphone conversations. Prior to that, the 1934 law that governed radio communications made it illegal to repeat what you heard from monitoring any radio transmission that wasn't intended for public use. Now, if some jerk, say Chuckie Schumer, talks too loud and can be overheard by anyone near him, well, that's certainly not illegal to listen to and report.


27 posted on 07/06/2005 9:16:04 AM PDT by Ikemeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

I hope Mr Bush stands firm on this and comes out swinging if the nominee encounters a filibuster. Being "gentlemanly" will get him nowhere.

Has any reporter ever directly asked Schumer or any of the other clowns why is it OK for you to impose litmus tests on judicial nominees but not for Republican presidents when they put forward someone??


28 posted on 07/06/2005 9:16:21 AM PDT by TNCMAXQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MikeA

Lucky Chucky


29 posted on 07/06/2005 9:16:27 AM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory

Don't count on this. You can always count on Senators like Trent Lott to back stab the Republican party.


30 posted on 07/06/2005 9:16:48 AM PDT by Sprite518
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

I wonder how Graham will react to being mocked in this way. I certainly wouldn't take it very well.


31 posted on 07/06/2005 9:17:04 AM PDT by AmishDude (Once you go black hat, you never go back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: MikeA
I'll pick people who one, can do the job; people who are honest, people who are bright; and people who will strictly interpret the Constitution and not use the bench to legislate from. That's what I campaigned on, and that's what I'm going to do."

GEORGE BUSH- Wed. July 6,2005

32 posted on 07/06/2005 9:17:56 AM PDT by joesnuffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

She didn't tell me.


33 posted on 07/06/2005 9:18:13 AM PDT by doug from upland (The Hillary documentary is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; cyborg; DKNY; ...
ping!

Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my ‘miscellaneous’ ping list.

34 posted on 07/06/2005 9:18:25 AM PDT by nutmeg ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - Hillary Clinton 6/28/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: capt. norm

Only if you're a Republican. If you're a Democrat, it is not against federal law.


35 posted on 07/06/2005 9:18:31 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ikemeister

Drudge's report indicated that it was overheard. He does not say who Chuckie was talking to, or what the other person was saying.


36 posted on 07/06/2005 9:19:13 AM PDT by mware ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche........ "Nope, you are"-- GOD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
I wonder how Graham will react to being mocked in this way.

"Please sir, may I have another?"

37 posted on 07/06/2005 9:20:16 AM PDT by hispanarepublicana (I was Lucy Ramirez when being Lucy Ramirez wasn't cool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: mlc9852

I agree: BRING IT ON, Rats, BRING IT ON. Plain and simple Americans who are SICK of their seditious BS will shout them down this time.

The most encouraging thing about the 2004 election is that 51% of the country doesn't believe the lamestream media anymore. Because if they did, with all the crap that was said about Bush, they never would have voted for him.

Now, the other shoe is about to fall. With all the invective and vitriol that will issue forth from the MSM, RATS, and MoveOver.org, et. al. over SCOTUS nominees, will come a tremendous backlash. The American people will go beyond just disbelief as to what the RATS and their friends say about Bush and those with whom they disagree, but will clearly see what the RAT party has become. And, they will RUN the other way. The GOP is about to clean up in 2006, in ways that we can hardly imagine.

The pathetic thing about the Left is that this is SO predictable. In inverse proportion, they will become more strident, more vocal, and more vociferous as they disintegrate, and so accelerate their demise.

Couldn't happen to a more deserving bunch.


38 posted on 07/06/2005 9:20:28 AM PDT by dfergu7477
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: capt. norm
This report covers the Schumer side of two phone calls, with no information about the other party in the first call, and limited information about Lindsay Graham's side of the second call. In short, it seems like this was NOT an intercept of the phone calls, but instead was someone sitting on the train near Schumer who heard Schumer's side only of these two calls.

There is no law violated by anyone reporting what they have heard with their own ears, in a public or private place. (And having spent decades in and around Washington, I've seen many instances of politicians making remarkably candid comments in the Monocle (Senate side) and Bullfeathers and Anton's (House side).) Anton's is long since out of business, but anyone can still hear such conversations today in those other two places, at their bars, later in the evening.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column: "Replace Justice O'Connor -- But Which One?"

39 posted on 07/06/2005 9:21:37 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Will President Bush appoint a Justice who obeys the Constitution? I give 65-35 odds on yes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MikeA
Beat you by 3 minutes... :)

Clicky!

40 posted on 07/06/2005 9:22:16 AM PDT by visagoth (If you think education is expensive - try ignorance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson