Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: longtermmemmory

I hope Mr Bush stands firm on this and comes out swinging if the nominee encounters a filibuster. Being "gentlemanly" will get him nowhere.

Has any reporter ever directly asked Schumer or any of the other clowns why is it OK for you to impose litmus tests on judicial nominees but not for Republican presidents when they put forward someone??


28 posted on 07/06/2005 9:16:21 AM PDT by TNCMAXQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: TNCMAXQ

Why do you say "Mr Bush" instead of President Bush? He really IS our president, even though the lame media would like us not to put the two words "President" and "Bush" together, as they do as seldom as possible.


42 posted on 07/06/2005 9:26:36 AM PDT by maica (Do not believe the garbage the media is feeding you back home. ---Allegra (in Iraq))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: TNCMAXQ
I believe the term "litmus test" emerged in the Reagan administration, when Democrats accused him of imposing such a test vis-´-vis abortion. But Democrat Senators always insisted they had no such test.

Schumer was the first to be honest and say that ideology and philosophy was a litmus test for him. It would not only influence his vote, but his attempt to use strong measures such as holding the nominee in committee and the filibuster.

47 posted on 07/06/2005 9:31:48 AM PDT by AmishDude (Once you go black hat, you never go back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson