Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Charles Schumer: Gay Marriage A Supreme Issue (Makes Gay Marriage An Issue In Confirmation Battle
Newsmax ^ | July 5, 2005 | Staff

Posted on 07/05/2005 1:20:54 PM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist

Leading Senate Judiciary Democrat Charles Schumer said Sunday that he intends to make gay marriage an issue in the upcoming confirmation battle over President Bush's pick to replace retiring Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor.

"All questions are legitimate," Schumer told ABC's "This Week." "What is your view on Roe vs. Wade? What is your view on gay marriage?"

"They are going to try to get away with the idea that we're not going to know their views," Schumer complained. "But that's not going to work."

The top Democrat's mention of same-sex marriage in the same breath as his party's primary litmus test issue, abortion, raised a few eyebrows.

"How does he suddenly have the chutzpah to ask that as a litmus question when he himself opposes it?" WABC Radio host Curtis Sliwa wondered Tuesday morning.

Schumer came out against gay marriage in 2004, after New Paltz, N.Y., Mayor Jason West performed nearly two-dozen same-sex unions.

As a congressman in 1996, Schumer voted for the Defense of Marriage Act, which authorizes states not to recognize same-sex unions from other jurisdictions.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 109th; issues; samesexmarriage; schumer; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 last
To: Brilliant
Currently, the Constitution does not ban gay marriage. So they would all say that it's a state issue, which would not sit well with conservatives.

Huh?

81 posted on 07/06/2005 4:48:49 AM PDT by MSSC6644
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: MSSC6644

What do you mean "huh?" Which point are you saying "huh?" to?

Clearly, the Constitution does not ban gay marriage. Show me where it does.

Equally clearly, conservatives want gay marriage banned nationwide. We forced Congress to pass a law stating that the federal government does not recognize gay marriages. We've pushed for a Constitutional ban.

Where's the confusion?


82 posted on 07/06/2005 5:05:57 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Laissez-faire capitalist
"They are going to try to get away with the idea that we're not going to know their views," Schumer complained. "But that's not going to work."

A nominee better be lucky
And get approval from close-minded Chucky
His vehemence floors us
He's a one-man Greek chorus
Whose vision for America's yucky.

83 posted on 07/06/2005 5:35:42 AM PDT by syriacus (Libs LUV a Justice who's ready, for approval from Dick, Chuck and Teddy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

It was quite early, and I apologize for my lack of specificity. As a conservative, I believe firmly in the principle of subsidiarity. I think issues like "Gay Marriage" belong at the state level, so I was confused by your statement "which would not sit well with conservatives."


84 posted on 07/06/2005 9:10:07 AM PDT by MSSC6644
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson