Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sinister Strategies-The Left's plan to block judicial nominees
National Review ^ | 07/05/05 | Mark R. Levin

Posted on 07/05/2005 9:05:26 AM PDT by smoothsailing

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 07/05/2005 9:05:27 AM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
I agree with Mark Levin that the left/Democrats are salivating at the idea of "borking" another conservative appointment to the Supreme Court. I agree that their tactics in the past were both scummy, and successful.

I disagree that they will succeed in blocking the President's nominations to the Supreme Court. There are only a few, but more than enough, of Democrat Senators who are running for reelection in 2006. They don't want to be on the wrong side of two particular issues, the eminent domain case from New London, and the anti-Ten Amendments case from Kentucky.

So, those few Democrats, and even the missing-in-action Republican squishes like Lincoln Chafee who fear the wrong side of those issues, will be enough to kill a filibuster. Crooked as he is, Minority Leader Reid can see the handwriting on the wall, so he has pointedly NOT threatened a filibuster on the Supreme Court.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column: "Replace Justice O'Connor -- But Which One?"

2 posted on 07/05/2005 9:14:49 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Will President Bush appoint a Justice who obeys the Constitution? I give 65-35 odds on yes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Mr. Levin you have this annoying habit of consistently hitting home runs :)

THANK YOU!

BUMP


3 posted on 07/05/2005 9:16:44 AM PDT by upchuck ("If our nation be destroyed, it would be from the judiciary." ~ Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

When they win the White House they can nominate whoever they want. In the meantime . . . SHUT UP!


4 posted on 07/05/2005 9:19:15 AM PDT by Repealthe17thAmendment (Is this field required?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Time for the Preston Brooks solution?


5 posted on 07/05/2005 9:20:14 AM PDT by Publius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
If Reid has thrown in the towel on this, then why all the hub bub from "the groups"?
6 posted on 07/05/2005 9:21:02 AM PDT by smoothsailing (Qui Nhon Turtle Co.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Mark Levin, 'The Great One'. He really does a great job on this issue. His book 'Men In Black' was great.


7 posted on 07/05/2005 9:24:06 AM PDT by marylandrepub1 (Liberals outlaw God believing that 'they' are the gods and can create Heaven on Earth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Bump


8 posted on 07/05/2005 9:27:07 AM PDT by Chuck54 (Someone please ping me when Barak Obama utters an original thought.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Repealthe17thAmendment
When they win the White House they can nominate whoever they want. In the meantime . . . SHUT UP!


9 posted on 07/05/2005 9:29:04 AM PDT by Protagoras (Now that the frog is fully cooked, how would you like it served?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Saw Sens Ted Kennedy and Spector together Sunday on 'This Week' defaming Judge Bork. They both agreed that if we followed the constitution we would go back to back alley butchers and segregated lunch lines and women not being able to vote. At the same time they claimed the constitution as being the biggest threat to this nation, Kennedy claimed it is critical for him to protect the 'hard earned' constitutional rights like abortion that are 'settled law'. Ted: Amending the constitution would be hard earned, not just smearing conservatives to get the rulings you want to ignore the constitution.


10 posted on 07/05/2005 9:33:57 AM PDT by marylandrepub1 (Liberals outlaw God believing that 'they' are the gods and can create Heaven on Earth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
The left will be in full cry on this with help from the groups Levin cites plus many more, including blanketing the media with all the accusations from said groups. Will the pols trust the true sense of the public or will they be stampeded with the media onslaught and phony polls?
11 posted on 07/05/2005 9:39:35 AM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not all that needs to be done needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul

Mark Levin ping.


12 posted on 07/05/2005 9:56:09 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but Lord I'm free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marylandrepub1
It's not surprising.I live in Pennsylvania and consider Spector an embarassment.I can't imagine what it must be like to be a conservative in Mass.

I read Levin's book also,he's one of my favorites! ;)

13 posted on 07/05/2005 10:13:12 AM PDT by smoothsailing (Qui Nhon Turtle Co.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

The "groups" get their money/funding from liberal wackos who want them keep the babies dying no matter what else happens. If the groups don't go the mattresses on this appointment then they won't get their donations.


14 posted on 07/05/2005 10:18:55 AM PDT by Friend of the Friendless
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Mark Levin *ping*


15 posted on 07/05/2005 10:19:16 AM PDT by smoothsailing (Qui Nhon Turtle Co.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Friend of the Friendless
As a fund-raising tool,it makes sense I suppose.They're a sick bunch.
16 posted on 07/05/2005 10:37:36 AM PDT by smoothsailing (Qui Nhon Turtle Co.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Bush will not get a nominee through, it will not happen, the liberals wont let it happen, the conservatives believe only in their jobs not the cause, all is lost, mark my words.


17 posted on 07/05/2005 10:39:21 AM PDT by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scythian
I don't share your view.

When W gets his nominees through,will you be pleasantly surprised,or just surprised?

18 posted on 07/05/2005 10:51:41 AM PDT by smoothsailing (Qui Nhon Turtle Co.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
Reid has not said he will NOT lead a filibuster. He has refrained from saying that he WILL lead a filibuster. He hasn't visibly thrown in the towel. However, compared to the successfully run filibusters on lower court judges, Reid has not been shouting his threats from the rooftops.

In Washington matters, I am a student of subtlety.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column: "Replace Justice O'Connor -- But Which One?"

19 posted on 07/05/2005 10:59:32 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Will President Bush appoint a Justice who obeys the Constitution? I give 65-35 odds on yes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
Got it! Thanks,CB.
20 posted on 07/05/2005 11:09:25 AM PDT by smoothsailing (Qui Nhon Turtle Co.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson