Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Women Must Change Too if we are to Rescue Marriage
The Financial Times ^ | July 5, 2005 | Richard Tomkins

Posted on 07/05/2005 5:31:57 AM PDT by Bon mots

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 881-900 next last
To: Bon mots

Oh BS.


561 posted on 07/05/2005 4:07:32 PM PDT by Melas (Lives in state of disbelief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Bon mots

You don't need money to attract women. I'm living proof.


562 posted on 07/05/2005 4:09:06 PM PDT by Melas (Lives in state of disbelief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 469 | View Replies]

To: Melas
You might be describing some that I've read about, like Susan faludi or Andrea Dworkin, but few real life feminists are like that, if any all outside the famously weird.

I'd have to agree. Most feminists are not hard-core theoreticians insulated from the consequences of their ideas.

In my experience, most feminists are simply opportunists looking for political positions that will give them the greatest advantage.

563 posted on 07/05/2005 4:15:04 PM PDT by papertyger (Power concedes nothing without a demand. – Frederick Douglass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 557 | View Replies]

To: T. Jefferson
After all, every single Fortune 500 company was started by a man. Many of today's most successful and brilliant people, Gates, Dell, etc., dropped out of college, and are a product of adapting, surviving, innovating in the trenches

YOu are looking at history, sure the 500 companies were started by males, back in the days when males went to college, and when males started their own businesses.

Bill Gates was interviewed and directly asked if he would hire himself if he applied to microsoft. Gates said that although he would like to hire himself, or someone like himself, he would not, because, as a dropout, he would never make it past the HR department.

564 posted on 07/05/2005 4:15:09 PM PDT by SandyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 521 | View Replies]

To: softwarecreator

Sigh I know what it means....I was hoping, obviously in vain, for specifics. You know, like, "This one kid carries a purse and wears lavender pants" or "My sons friend wears lipstick and go-go boots". The point was that I was trying to get more information so I could evaluate your claim.


565 posted on 07/05/2005 4:15:42 PM PDT by Melas (Lives in state of disbelief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 545 | View Replies]

To: Bon mots
I'm a 55 year-old man, widowed 1-1/2 years ago. I am financially secure, my three kids are mostly raised and my home is paid for, I will be able to retire in about 4 years and wouldn't think of getting married again. I had 29 wonderful years and in those nearly three dacades the social marketplace has changed a whole lot. When I was in my 20's the guys chased the women. Not now. I got hit on at my wife's wake, I was invited to a woman's summer home for a weekend 20 minutes after I met her. I'm not bragging and I know other widowers who have similar stories.

If a man has a job or financial security, looks okay and is not deep in debt he is considered prime. I'm going to enjoy the situation and make it plain that marriage is something I did and did well but I'm not doing it again.

566 posted on 07/05/2005 4:19:23 PM PDT by muir_redwoods (Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopeckne is walking around free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bon mots

ho hum.


567 posted on 07/05/2005 4:24:01 PM PDT by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods
I got hit on at my wife's wake...

My word, that's tacky! I have heard similar stories, too, though. *shudder*

568 posted on 07/05/2005 4:31:00 PM PDT by exnavychick (There's too much youth; how about a fountain of smart?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 566 | View Replies]

To: SandyB
Cute, and irrelevant, particularly the Gates comment. That must be the infamous liberal trickle up theory, where employees create the company, not the entrepreneur. My previous statement applies whether discussing Fortune 500 companies or small successful startups.

I can't imagine where you circle of info resides to come up with the all men skip college and no longer create businesses theory. Do you tall girls only hang out in bowling alleys?

: )

569 posted on 07/05/2005 4:38:08 PM PDT by T. Jefferson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 564 | View Replies]

To: Melas
Not really, we just want so much more. If you lived as a family in the 1950s did, you'd be surprised at just how cheaply you could live. Look at: Square footage of housing. They lived in cracker boxes back then. Appliances owned Vehicles owned and annual mileage Clothing owned Extras like gym memberships Eating out I think you'd find we could all squirrel away fortunes if we lived as spartan a lifestyle as they lived then.

average Federal personal income tax: $100.00

maximum annual social security tax: $45.00

average state personal income tax: $ 0

property tax: $40.00

sales tax: 2%

medicare tax: $ 0

credit card debt: 0

total federal debt: $257 billion

gasoline tax: 2 cents a gallon

cigarette tax: 5 cents a pack

Number of personal bankruptcies in 1950: 25,040

Those houses from the 1950's are still here, still around, and some of them are for sale - people still want to live in them. What you call a "cracker jack house", bought for $6 - 8000 in the 1950's, is now currently selling for $200,000 - $400,000. They also have real plaster on the walls, fancy woodwork, glass doorknobs, wood floors, etc.

570 posted on 07/05/2005 4:40:10 PM PDT by SandyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 560 | View Replies]

To: SandyB

They aren't selling for near that here. Here, $200,000 through $400,000 buys you a McMansion the size of a small bank.


571 posted on 07/05/2005 4:41:49 PM PDT by Melas (Lives in state of disbelief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 570 | View Replies]

To: Melas
What's to evaluate?  When I was growing up there were maybe a handful of guys who exhibited what I would call "effeminate qualities" or were outright gay.  Today there are far, far, far more showing these characteristics.

Is this a scientific fact? no.
Did I consult a sociologist on my claim? no.
Did I commission a Gallup Poll on it? no.
Did I commission a RL Polk survey? no.
Will this hold up in court? no.
Did I question the youths about their sexual orientation? no.
Is there a +/- ratio of error? yes.
Could the results be exaggerated? yes.

Hope this helps!

572 posted on 07/05/2005 4:59:22 PM PDT by softwarecreator (Facts are to liberals as holy water is to vampires)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 565 | View Replies]

To: T. Jefferson
I can't imagine where you circle of info resides to come up with the all men skip college

Women now make up a majority of college students, a trend expected to continue as high school girls outperform boys in the classroom.

National college enrollment (two- and four-year colleges) Females: 56% Males: 44% **

U.S. high school students who... Ranked in top 10% of class Females: 56% Males: 42%

Maintained an A average Females: 62% Males: 38%

Natural Sciences Males: 46%; Females: 54%

Math Males: 45%; Females: 55%

Foreign Languages Males: 39%; Females: 61%

573 posted on 07/05/2005 5:02:20 PM PDT by SandyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 569 | View Replies]

To: LongElegantLegs
I didn't say women staying at home is the root cause of divorce...getting married too young is probably the main reason. My point was that if men didn't cheat, there would be less divorces...alot less. It brought on the movement of the easy divorce. Men were cheating on their wives and the women decided not to put up with it...thus got up the nerve to divorce. Now...in todays world, they want to be able to support themselves instead of taking the ex to court for child support.

Also...any women today that doesn't get some kind of education before getting married and having kids is a fool.

574 posted on 07/05/2005 5:06:37 PM PDT by Fawn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 550 | View Replies]

To: Melas
They aren't selling for near that here. Here, $200,000 through $400,000 buys you a McMansion the size of a small bank

the $6000 houses in my old neighborhood are now all currently selling in excess of $200,000, most of them, the "cracker jack" type, go for about $200,000 to $250,000. The 1955 house next door just sold for $240,000.

My friends from California tell me that their old houses are selling in excess of $400,000.

575 posted on 07/05/2005 5:06:42 PM PDT by SandyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 571 | View Replies]

To: T. Jefferson
Bill Gates was interviewed and directly asked if he would hire himself if he applied to microsoft. Gates said that although he would like to hire himself, or someone like himself, he would not, because, as a dropout, he would never make it past the HR department.

Cute, and irrelevant, particularly the Gates comment

Gates didnt think it was irrelevent. He was making a point that today it now takes more than what he had (and what he did not have - a degree).

576 posted on 07/05/2005 5:10:27 PM PDT by SandyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 569 | View Replies]

To: digitalman

Well said.


577 posted on 07/05/2005 5:23:59 PM PDT by djreece ("... Until He leads justice to victory." Matt. 12:20c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: SandyB
Gates didnt think it was irrelevent. He was making a point that today it now takes more than what he had (and what he did not have - a degree).

Are you daft?

That's not the point he was making.

If there's any point at all to hiis statement, it's that you can't blaze trails through well travelled ground!

578 posted on 07/05/2005 5:25:04 PM PDT by papertyger (Power concedes nothing without a demand. – Frederick Douglass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 576 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods
marriage is something I did and did well but I'm not doing it again.

SEE!

You fear commitment...

579 posted on 07/05/2005 5:31:00 PM PDT by papertyger (Power concedes nothing without a demand. – Frederick Douglass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 566 | View Replies]

To: Fawn
My point was that if men didn't cheat, there would be less divorces...alot less. It brought on the movement of the easy divorce. Men were cheating on their wives and the women decided not to put up with it...thus got up the nerve to divorce. Now...in todays world, they want to be able to support themselves instead of taking the ex to court for child support.

My, you've thought alot about this without any real experience, haven't you?

580 posted on 07/05/2005 5:34:29 PM PDT by papertyger (Power concedes nothing without a demand. – Frederick Douglass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 574 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 881-900 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson