Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 07/04/2005 8:02:41 PM PDT by blueberry12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
To: blueberry12
Kennedy is obviously near that point in life where cardiovascular collapse is a distinct possibility.

Best bet is to encourage him to rage.

2 posted on 07/04/2005 8:04:40 PM PDT by muawiyah (/sarcasm and invective)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueberry12

Ted Kennedy Leads party over another bridge.

HICCUP !!!!


3 posted on 07/04/2005 8:06:03 PM PDT by Michigan Bowhunter (What quantifies this as an assault rifle?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueberry12

Senator Fatimir Harkennedy

4 posted on 07/04/2005 8:06:51 PM PDT by Paul Atreides (The Democrats have the right mascot; everyone knows what comes out of an ass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueberry12

Bring it on, FAT BOY.


7 posted on 07/04/2005 8:10:59 PM PDT by ModernDayCato (Republicans - Frittering away their majority and their base)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueberry12
I find that the issue of Abortion being held over competent nominee's,
is small minded and childish at the very least.

The Dem's have nothing else to fight/stand for. How pathetic.

8 posted on 07/04/2005 8:12:23 PM PDT by MaxMax (God Bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueberry12
No big deal for him. He's gone off a bridge before and survived.
10 posted on 07/04/2005 8:13:16 PM PDT by b4its2late (GITMO is way too nice of a place to house low life terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueberry12
My favorite Ted Kennedy flash movie... (Warning: very annoying and gross just like Teddy.)

Tribute to Ted Kennedy

11 posted on 07/04/2005 8:14:19 PM PDT by EdHallick (All you base belong to us and you shoe too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueberry12

That he sits in judgement of judges of law is one of the biggest cases of bizarro irony that I can think of. Senator Kennedy would still be checking in with his Parole Officer in a perfectly just world.


12 posted on 07/04/2005 8:14:34 PM PDT by Ghengis (Alexander was a wuss!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueberry12
[ Ted Kennedy's Last Stand: He'll Lead Senate Battle Over Court Pick ]

If only it was that easy...

15 posted on 07/04/2005 8:16:56 PM PDT by hosepipe (This propaganda has been ok'ed me to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueberry12; Travis McGee; devolve; potlatch; Smartass; B4Ranch; Boazo; Grampa Dave; JohnHuang2; ...

USSC ping.


17 posted on 07/04/2005 8:18:41 PM PDT by Happy2BMe (Viva La MIGRA - LONG LIVE THE BORDER PATROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueberry12

It's amazing that there is already confirmation of opposition, without a nominee.


18 posted on 07/04/2005 8:19:07 PM PDT by AD from SpringBay (We have the government we allow and deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueberry12
The Hero of Chappaquidick.

Fight's on!

19 posted on 07/04/2005 8:20:11 PM PDT by paddles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueberry12
Kennedy is a fat-assed pig that has lost his mind.

Bring-it-on fat boy!!

20 posted on 07/04/2005 8:21:14 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueberry12

And this is after all the Bushs did to kiss his ass.


21 posted on 07/04/2005 8:22:36 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueberry12

23 posted on 07/04/2005 8:23:46 PM PDT by Bratch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueberry12
Ted ("The Human Zipcode") Kennedy will certainly lead the charge against whomever the President nominates. However, unlike Reid's successful filibuster, Teddy will be up against the fact that several Democrat Senators are nervous about getting reelected in 2006.

So, Teddy's gonna finding himself leading too few lemmings over the cliff, or Buicks off the bridge, if you prefer. In short, he will be loud but irrelevant.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column: "Replace Justice O'Connor -- But Which One?"

26 posted on 07/04/2005 8:25:27 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Will President Bush appoint a Justice who obeys the Constitution? I give 65-35 odds on yes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueberry12

Anyone looking for a laugh at the Senior Senator's expense should check out Boston radio host Howie Carr's special website dedicated just to Ted:

www.fatboy.cc

Sigh. On behalf of Massachusetts residents, I apologize for our sad and sorry contributions to the Senate. And for Dukakis. And for the Big Dig. And for our loony, left-wing Supreme Judicial Court. And for...hey, I have to get up for work tomorrow. I could be here all night.


28 posted on 07/04/2005 8:26:31 PM PDT by LostInBayport (Massachusetts liberals refuse to admit we exist...we are the 37% who voted for GWB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueberry12
Ted ("The Human Zipcode") Kennedy will certainly lead the charge against whomever the President nominates. However, unlike Reid's successful filibuster, Teddy will be up against the fact that several Democrat Senators are nervous about getting reelected in 2006.

So, Teddy's gonna finding himself leading too few lemmings over the cliff, or Buicks off the bridge, if you prefer. In short, he will be loud but irrelevant.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column: "Replace Justice O'Connor -- But Which One?"

29 posted on 07/04/2005 8:26:39 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Will President Bush appoint a Justice who obeys the Constitution? I give 65-35 odds on yes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueberry12
Let's play, "Spot the Grammar Moron"! Which was written by Newsmax, and which is correct?

1. As part and parcel of the compromise, ONLY members agreed that a filibuster would be used on future judges, including Supreme Court nominees, in "extraordinary circumstances."

2. As part and parcel of the compromise, members ONLY agreed that a filibuster would be used on future judges, including Supreme Court nominees, in "extraordinary circumstances."

3. As part and parcel of the compromise, members agreed that ONLY a filibuster would be used on future judges, including Supreme Court nominees, in "extraordinary circumstances."

4. As part and parcel of the compromise, members agreed that a filibuster would ONLY be used on future judges, including Supreme Court nominees, in "extraordinary circumstances."

5. As part and parcel of the compromise, members agreed that a filibuster would be used ONLY on future judges, including Supreme Court nominees, in "extraordinary circumstances."

6. As part and parcel of the compromise, members agreed that a filibuster would be used on future judges, including Supreme Court nominees, ONLY in "extraordinary circumstances."

Interestingly, except for one of the above, each is correct, and has a different meaning. Newsmax used the only one that is just plain wrong.
36 posted on 07/04/2005 8:32:29 PM PDT by Atlas Sneezed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blueberry12
One day that SOB is going to drop dead right on the Senate floor. I only pray he doesn't crush a Boy Scout troop on a tour of the building.
37 posted on 07/04/2005 8:34:12 PM PDT by BigCinBigD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson