Posted on 07/03/2005 8:02:04 PM PDT by wagglebee
Just last month Spector said something right after the "Gang of Sixteen" brokered their deal that I find very telling about where Spector is coming from.
Spector was asked if he would vote for Janice Rogers Brown and he said something like this, (I can get the exact quote if you need it) He said: "I will not announce how I will vote, I can get far more by not revealing what my intentions are"
So what that tells me is that Spector is for sale, and he has no principles
Evidently a bazillion won't do it.
It's the DYNASTY thing. It hasn't anything at all to do with Katherine Harris ( whom I never mentioned ),nor the Shavio case, or anything else. Besides all of the screaming, from the Dems, about "stolen election", as soon as President Bush won the election in '00, the tortured wailing about THE BUSH DYNASTY/WE DON'T HAVE KINGS IN AMERICA garbage began.
I watched the Thomas hearings, and I watched the Ginsburg hearings, I challenge anybody to say the two of them were treated the same, Ginsburg was an ACLU attorney and I expected her to be opposed, or at least not get any republican support. Nope Orin Hatch wanted to play nice. Those days are over, it's now time to take back the Courts from these Activists
"POOF" = exploded, went away, disappeared, vanished, were ended, gone, finished, done,over.
This and the rest of your post I S = B S !!!
If the W doesn't nominate a conservative in the vein of Thomas or Scalia, I am done voting for Republicans period. End of story. Even Scalia is too weak for my tastes, with his respect for past decisions outweighing his desire to be "constitutional". But I would settle for that if I had to.
Gonzales would be the last straw for me. People can say what they want about his past abortion rulings being dictated by the state laws of Texas. But his affirmative action stance was fully chosen by him and reflects either a liberal mindset or an unprincipled conservatism. Both are unacceptable.
that's insane. jeb bush is an outstanding governor and would be the ONLY logical choice for prez if his last name woudln't hurt him.
again, pure stupidity.
jeb will not run this time, he will run in the future...2012 or 2016
I figger they know who they can trust.
The dynasty thing ONLY "works", sort of, for Dems. As soon as President Bush the younger was elected the first time, the talk, by both Dems and GOPers, was that Jeb's presidential potential was now over. With the re-election of the president, it was begun again and stronger.
Jeb has baggage that is NOT even being discussed on this thread ( his daughter's drug problem and his wife's run-in with the nondisclosure/tampering with the labels, customs problem ), which combined with the "dynasty" thing and the Shavio case and goodness only knows what else, would automatically spell his doom. And lest you forget, his wife does NOT want him to run/be president.
Refute me with facts; if you have any. To simply call my post/s "BS", is childish at best.
You think that Scalia is a moderate? How about Thomas?
If neither of those men are Conservative enough for you, then who is?
And yes, I am correct; Jeb will NEVER be president.
That's highly doubtful.
Why can't we clone Thomas.
Jeb never wished to, so that taunt has all the power of "YOU will never be president."
That's what I was about to say.
I mean, I've got concerns about Gonzalas, but I'm certainly not going to instantly go nuts on Bush if he does nominate him (which I doubt). I'll take the 'wait and see' approach. He may well surprise us.
All I know, is that Bush has lived up to my trust better then any politician since Reagan, and even in some ways better. He's got a whole lot of slack on my rope. Could he hang himself with it? Possibly, but I doubt it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.