Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats Say No Money Is Missing (waders needed-knee deep BS)
The Lakeland Ledger ^ | July 1, 2005 | By Joe Follick

Posted on 07/03/2005 5:40:41 AM PDT by ChildOfThe60s

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
Florida Democratic Party said Thursday that an audit showed no money missing and also showed no intentional fraud in the nonpayment of federal taxes in 2003

Note that not one reporter calls them on this baloney.

They withhold $200,000 in taxes from paychecks & then do not send it to the IRS; they spend it. Can anyone in liberal never-never land explain how that can happen without fraud?

Two weeks ago $900,000 is missing. Now, amazingly it's not? Excuse me while I leap off the back of a turnip truck.

1 posted on 07/03/2005 5:40:43 AM PDT by ChildOfThe60s
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s

This thereore makes them eminently qualified to run the state government...


2 posted on 07/03/2005 5:42:24 AM PDT by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s

Depends on what the definition of "missing" is.


3 posted on 07/03/2005 5:43:46 AM PDT by linkinpunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s

Great post. Another shining example of the anti-freedom, Democratic Crime Syndicate at work in The United States of America.


4 posted on 07/03/2005 5:46:26 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: linkinpunk

Oh yeah, and I should have aked, what exactly does "no intentional fraud" mean? There is such a thing as unintentional fraud?


5 posted on 07/03/2005 5:47:03 AM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s......you weren't really there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: linkinpunk

They found the missing money on Hillary Clinton's desk


6 posted on 07/03/2005 5:51:32 AM PDT by MudSlide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s
Florida Dim party chair, Karen Thurman is in my district. She is a liberal ditz of the first magnitude.

From her thin, cold lips, I know now that if I ever get in deep doo-doo with the IRS, I just have to declare it a "new day", state good intentions for the future, and move on.

Please forward any freepmails to me at the Tallahassee Federal Graybar Hotel.

7 posted on 07/03/2005 5:55:04 AM PDT by MinuteGal (Florida Freepers: Check out the Florida Forum. Click the Florida Flag on Your Profile Page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s

Wow If Maddox did this in only two years for the Florida RAT Party just think just think what he could do in two years to the whole state as its Governor! Another great highly qualified candidate for sure---not.


8 posted on 07/03/2005 6:06:20 AM PDT by rod1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s

>>an audit showed no money missing

I'm thinking that one of the Big Four CPA firms did *NOT* sign off on that one.

Notice there is no mention of who did the audit, other than "the audit by outside experts". Oh, well, that pins it right down. "Outside experts". Great.

Where's the pdf of the audit results letter with all the footnotes, signed by a CPA?


9 posted on 07/03/2005 6:06:41 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (This space intentionally blank) (NRA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s

Someone should tell Karen there are no more bucks to stop with her. Only IOUs. Wonder how

They are in debt thaks to this crooked operation.


I assume Ms. Over-Her-Head Hyphenated was hired by Maddox for some other purpose than her administrative skills. Wonder how much money Tallehasse lost when these people were in charge of the money.


10 posted on 07/03/2005 6:10:04 AM PDT by rod1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s
"The audit also said former party chairman Scott Maddox had no knowledge of the myriad accounting woes that happened on his watch."

If this were a private sector business owner the Dems would be crying to Sarbanes-Oxley him off to some hard time. Somebody needs to go to jail.

11 posted on 07/03/2005 6:24:13 AM PDT by hometoroost (TSA = Thousands Standing Around)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
12 posted on 07/03/2005 6:31:39 AM PDT by John Jorsett (scam never sleeps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s
Thursday, she said the party had about $80,000 on hand. That's less than 2 percent of the $7 million-plus raised by the Republican Party of Florida this year.

If this is true, then the Dems are in deep trouble. Dems depend heavily on "walking around money" to grease the palms of their "activist" base, to pay for buses to bring people to the polls, etc, etc. No money = no turnout.

The vulnerability of the Dems is that they need to have the ability to flow govt money to their base, and to do "favors" for their contributors. If they are sufficiently out of power that they're unable to do anything for their base and their contributors, then they will go into a steep downward spiral

13 posted on 07/03/2005 6:33:14 AM PDT by SauronOfMordor (When peace stands for surrender, fear, loss of dignity and freedom, it is no longer peace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s
So what is their claim, no intentional fraud, just rank stupidity?
14 posted on 07/03/2005 9:59:55 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (Same stuff, different democRAT [this tagline rated PG-13])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s

They withhold $200,000 in taxes from paychecks & then do not send it to the IRS; they spend it. Can anyone in liberal never-never land explain how that can happen without fraud?

My understand of the law is that failure to turn in withholdings from paychecks subjects the principals in the organization to personal liability. This is statutory fraud as I understand it, whether "intentional" or not. I wonder (not really) whether media coverage would have been somewhat more substantial had this been a republican organization. Is anyone else surprised that Dan Rather has not come out of retirement to chase this story? /sarcasm


15 posted on 07/03/2005 10:07:56 AM PDT by NCLaw441
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s
Maddox said he thought Griffin-Bruton could handle the work and hired other outside accountants to help her.

Ah, I see it now ... applied welfare was the culprit, patronage for a crony. Promote a clerk to CFO and then spend the party's money to cover up for the favor. Of course Maddox is yelling smear campaign ... what else is a RAT to do when caught red-handed. It could have been a payoff (what did that woman know and when did she know it?), a shining example of Maddox's decision-making ability (and a clear example of what would happen as gov), or payback for sexual favors (no proof but such a promotion of a female does call the question). All Maddox can do now is try to kill the messengers. He knows the MSM will protect him from real scrutiny.

16 posted on 07/03/2005 10:10:59 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (Same stuff, different democRAT [this tagline rated PG-13])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s

No money was missing.

Sincerely,

Rev. Al Sharpton, CPA


17 posted on 07/03/2005 3:42:16 PM PDT by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Brush

Here's a prime example of "that" overload. Read this column, eliminating every "that", (except one I think, in the second paragraph), and you'll discover how aggravating these goober writers are. It reads so much better without "that" clutter. I don't know if this qualifies as "verbal acne", but it's driving me up the proverbial wall.


18 posted on 07/03/2005 3:52:45 PM PDT by YaYa123 (@"That" sucks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ChildOfThe60s
Thursday, she said the party had about $80,000 on hand.

Wait, they coughed up 98,000 and borrowed another
$102,000 from the party, shouldn't they be still in debt?
Maybe this is part of the $900,000?
With democrats money just appears and disappears like magic.
19 posted on 07/03/2005 3:59:40 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tet68

Exactly. 900 G's missing, two days later it's not. They withold 200 grand from paychecks, send nothing to IRS, have 90 grand on hand. But, there's nothing missing? New math? Or just people that know the press will not call them on whatever BS they throw out?


20 posted on 07/03/2005 5:06:41 PM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s......you weren't really there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson