Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Rove Factor?
Newsweek ^ | 06/11/05 | Michael Isikoff

Posted on 07/02/2005 1:05:55 PM PDT by Pikamax

The Rove Factor? Time magazine talked to Bush's guru for Plame story.

By Michael Isikoff Newsweek July 11 issue - Its legal appeals exhausted, Time magazine agreed last week to turn over reporter Matthew Cooper's e-mails and computer notes to a special prosecutor investigating the leak of an undercover CIA agent's identity. The case has been the subject of press controversy for two years. Saying "we are not above the law," Time Inc. Editor in Chief Norman Pearlstine decided to comply with a grand-jury subpoena to turn over documents related to the leak. But Cooper (and a New York Times reporter, Judith Miller) is still refusing to testify and faces jail this week.

At issue is the story of a CIA-sponsored trip taken by former ambassador (and White House critic) Joseph Wilson to investigate reports that Iraq was seeking to buy uranium from the African country of Niger. "Some government officials have noted to Time in interviews... that Wilson's wife, Valerie Plame, is a CIA official who monitors the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction," said Cooper's July 2003 Time online article.

Now the story may be about to take another turn. The e-mails surrendered by Time Inc., which are largely between Cooper and his editors, show that one of Cooper's sources was White House deputy chief of staff Karl Rove, according to two lawyers who asked not to be identified because they are representing witnesses sympathetic to the White House. Cooper and a Time spokeswoman declined to comment. But in an interview with NEWSWEEK, Rove's lawyer, Robert Luskin, confirmed that Rove had been interviewed by Cooper for the article. It is unclear, however, what passed between Cooper and Rove.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cialeak; isikoff; karlrove; newsweek
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-122 next last

1 posted on 07/02/2005 1:05:55 PM PDT by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
It is unclear, however, what passed between Cooper and Rove.
2 posted on 07/02/2005 1:07:41 PM PDT by woofie (An invisible man marries an invisible woman. The kids were nothing to look at)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

hmmmmm -- well it looks like Rove is involved somehow. There will be many twists to this story.


3 posted on 07/02/2005 1:08:58 PM PDT by rface ("...the most schizoid freeper I've ever seen" - New Bloomfield, Missouri)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: Pikamax

What garbage. It has already been well established on other threads that Rove did nothing wrong. Charaacter assasination, pure and simple. I hope the White House doesn't knuckle under and fights this tooth and nail. And what about those two lawyers leaking information about their clients? They should be investigated and disbarred.


5 posted on 07/02/2005 1:09:58 PM PDT by balch3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

Well, this is the most detail so far, but there's nothing there that says "Rove was the source of the leak".

Not that it can be called a leak, really, but you know.


6 posted on 07/02/2005 1:11:39 PM PDT by HarryCaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
Rove's lawyer, Robert Luskin, confirmed that Rove had been interviewed by Cooper for the article. It is unclear, however, what passed between Cooper and Rove.

Jeez, the liberal media will clutch at ANYTHING that they can try to pin on Karl Rove.

You can bet every dollar you have that if Karl Rove was the source, Cooper, Miller, and every liberal media entity would be screaming it from the rooftops.

The REAL leaker is a Dem, you can guarantee it. Patrick Leaky?

7 posted on 07/02/2005 1:11:40 PM PDT by Henchster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

My understanding is that Plame was once a covert agent but since her marriage became an above the board agent with a staff job. It's not criminal to speak of a "known" CIA employee.


8 posted on 07/02/2005 1:12:38 PM PDT by byteback
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: balch3
"Luskin told NEWSWEEK that Rove "never knowingly disclosed classified information" and that "he did not tell any reporter that Valerie Plame worked for the CIA." Luskin declined, however, to discuss any other details. He did say that Rove himself had testified before the grand jury "two or three times" and signed a waiver authorizing reporters to testify about their conversations with him. "He has answered every question that has been put to him about his conversations with Cooper and anybody else," Luskin said."

This appears to absolve Rove of any wrong doing.

9 posted on 07/02/2005 1:12:40 PM PDT by Eagles Talon IV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rface

I would be checking their notes for being word-processed instead of typewritten, for I would not consider them to be above forgery.


10 posted on 07/02/2005 1:12:56 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HarryCaul

so much for Lawrence O'Donnell "ITS ROVE!!!" scoop.


11 posted on 07/02/2005 1:13:18 PM PDT by Pikamax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

I'm not sure why this is such a big deal. Rove has waived any confidentiality and said that reporters can reveal anything that was said between himself and them. It's not exactly an 'aha' moment when the reporters turn over their notes, at least as regards Rove, since he's said they could for a while now.


12 posted on 07/02/2005 1:13:44 PM PDT by John Jorsett (scam never sleeps)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
It is unclear, however, what passed between Cooper and Rove.

Newsweek launches the S.S. Revenge.

My take is that if they actually had anything on Rove, this would have come out months ago, journo "integrity" aside...
13 posted on 07/02/2005 1:14:05 PM PDT by timpad (The Wizard Tim - Keeper of the Holy Hand Grenade, Finder of Obscurata)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

This is the so-called "IT'S ROVE" scoop by Newsweek O'Donnell was talking about?

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! This article practically absolves him.

Someone should post this at the DUmp.


14 posted on 07/02/2005 1:15:50 PM PDT by West Coast Conservative (Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: timpad

Well, we do have to consider the source.

Next he'll be saying Rove flushed the notes down a toilet.


15 posted on 07/02/2005 1:16:48 PM PDT by HarryCaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GSlob

Michael Isikoff...the same fellow that wrote the "abuse of Koran" stories for Newsweak, resulting in, what was it, 18 deaths? And then had to retract the story....


16 posted on 07/02/2005 1:16:57 PM PDT by sofaman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax
In my opinion, it was Mr.Plame who leaked his wife's identity. He was way too eager to repeat the news for the camera, and actually flaunted it. He even had special thanks to his wife, "an agent of the CIA", already printed in the book he was getting ready to release.

There are two very liberal writers willing to go to jail to protect someone - and I doubt they're doing it to protect Karl Rove!

17 posted on 07/02/2005 1:17:11 PM PDT by concerned about politics (Vote Republican - Vote morally correct!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pikamax

Relax. Rove always admitted to providing information to reporters AFTER the Novak story. There is nothing knew here, except "reporters" like Iskoff (who is guilty of publishing false stories before to attempt to make a name for himself) trying to make something out of nothing. I like the way Iskoff quotes unnamed lawyers who are sympathtic to the White House, however, they have no probably spreading rumors. This will be another Rove conspiracy story that backfires on the libs.


18 posted on 07/02/2005 1:18:15 PM PDT by NathanBookman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GSlob
Notes, e-mails whatever. I agree with you.

I wonder when will the reporter answer these questions "under sworn oath" before the GJ. COC is bad, perjury (unless you are a sitting president) is very, very bad!
19 posted on 07/02/2005 1:18:40 PM PDT by lowbuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Eagles Talon IV
This appears to absolve Rove of any wrong doing.

Yes, it does. The media will, however, attempt to make something of it, just like they've done with everything else.

Beep beep!

20 posted on 07/02/2005 1:19:30 PM PDT by alnick ("I will continue to be guided by the advice that matters." GWB 6/28/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-122 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson