This is definitely an example for execution. His brain is defective. Any man who molests little boys isn't worth rehabilitating, because like you say, he can never be trusted.
But here's a straw man to trip people up: a 19 year old man taking a 17 year old female in his car and then getting fresh with her. That's a little different. On the other hand, a 25 year old man with a 16 year old teenage boy, that's plain sick. I think that people can generally agree on the very extreme cases like this one.
FRegards....
I agree. I know (or used to know, haven't heard from the family in years) a case where a young man about 18 or 19 yrs old stayed overnight at a friend's house, and the 12 year old overdeveloped sister crawled in bed with him, and what you might imagine to occur occured.
The girl wouldn't take "no" for an answer, and he let the wrong head do the thinking. Then she complained or told someone, and he was arrested. He was not the first boy she'd seduced.
The young man was sentenced to a few years in prison.
His life is probably ruined by now. I used to communicate with him several years ago by mail, trying to encourage him not to be bitter, not to place blame on others, and admit his own fault. He did to some degree, but being a skinny white boy in a CA prison system stuffed with gang members, he was always in fear.
I wish I knew what became of him.
This is NOT the kind of sex offender that needs execution, needless to say.
You'd have to execute most of the gay population.
Young gay boys are a hot commodity for gays, which is why these gay activist groups are pushing so hard to have gay sex as just another alternative taught young kids in hopes of creating "fresh meat".
There is a doccumentry out called "boys town", it about the inner workings of the young gay boy sex trade in Vancover.
It's disgusting. They are nothing but predators, and sadly it's become acceptable!! How we as a society can allow this gay infuence in our schools to mold the minds of our children
truely reflects just how sick society has become.
I think a simple line could be drawn there, even with the understanding that the legal system can only satisfactorly deal with the quantifiable. Getting fresh with someone past puberty isn't the same kind of red flag as sexual interest in a prepubscent.
Many (though not all) localities have amended their statutory rape laws to allow for slight age differences (typically four years) regarding sexual realtions between those over 12 or 13 and under 18. For example, it is not illegal to have sex with a 16 or 17 year old girl providing one is not more than four years older than her. This is to prevent an 18 year-old high school senior from being charged as a sex offender for having consensual sex with his 17 year-old high school junior girlfriend.
Like I said though not all localities employ this safety measure. I recall reading of an eighteen year-old male forced to register as a sex offender for the rest of his life for having sex with his 16 year-old girlfriend. Even her parents came out in his support but to no avail.
I know a guy just like that. Great guy, but got caught with his (and her's) pants down when she was just shy of 18 and he was 20 (in college).
Nice wife and kids and churchgoers.