Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I hope this isn't true.
1 posted on 07/01/2005 8:28:36 AM PDT by 68skylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
To: 68skylark

Gonzales doesn't make sense, he'd have to recuse himself on just about WOT issue.
Cast your eyes to a 4th circuit little known
conservative woman...


2 posted on 07/01/2005 8:30:34 AM PDT by WoodstockCat (Gitmo? Let them eat Pork!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 68skylark

It would be difficult to refuse to confirm Janice Rogers Brown.


3 posted on 07/01/2005 8:30:58 AM PDT by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 68skylark

No to Gonzales.


4 posted on 07/01/2005 8:31:03 AM PDT by Last Dakotan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 68skylark

How 'bout we wait and see. The people have a great deal to say about the nomination. Sadly, we don't have much to say about the confirmation.


5 posted on 07/01/2005 8:32:04 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 68skylark

This is the acid test. What Bush does in the fight to replace O'Connor will be more important than anything else he has done in office, even the War on Terror.

There can be no War on Terror if our country is ruled by unelected activist judges, who keep cutting the constitution out from under our feet. NOTHING is more important than to restore the rule of law to our country.

Nominating Gonzalez would be the death of any good will Bush has earned among social conservatives. Small lapses can be forgiven, but this would be a gigantic step in the wrong direction, an unforgiveable betrayal of the base who turned out to work and vote for him in the last three elections. It would kill the conservative revival dead, and give the White House to hillary on a silver platter.


6 posted on 07/01/2005 8:32:53 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 68skylark

I guess today is the day to mass email the white house "ANYBODY BUT GONZALES" yes?


7 posted on 07/01/2005 8:34:21 AM PDT by kharaku (G3 (http://www.cobolsoundsystem.com/mp3s/unreleased/evewasanape.mp3))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 68skylark
Janice Rogers Brown. That would totally bypass the criticism he's going to get if he doesn't appoint a woman to replace a woman.
8 posted on 07/01/2005 8:34:34 AM PDT by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 68skylark

Good riddance Sad Sandra Day, hello HAPPY DAYS!!!!!


9 posted on 07/01/2005 8:34:51 AM PDT by hflynn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 68skylark
The president has to know that conservatives, his supporters in good times and bad, would be appalled and demoralized by a Gonzales appointment.

EXACTLY why I oppose term limits! We should repeal the 2 term limit on the President.
Without the possibility of reelection, he is free to carry out his real priorities with no fear of repercussions.
The WORST legislation, appointments, etc always come when our "elected" officially either decide to retire, of face a term limitation, rendering them unaccountable to the electorate.

GE
10 posted on 07/01/2005 8:35:32 AM PDT by GrandEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 68skylark

Gonzales is a gun-grabber. KEEP HIM OUT!


11 posted on 07/01/2005 8:35:39 AM PDT by Tax-chick ("I am saying that the government's complicity is dishonest and disingenuous." ~NCSteve)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 68skylark; Miss Marple

Can you remember the last time Bill Kristol was right about anything?

He's completely out of the White House loop. And he's STILL made about it.


12 posted on 07/01/2005 8:36:19 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 68skylark

President Bush arrives to make a statement about the retirement of Supreme Court justice Sandra Day O'Connor in the Rose Garden of the White House Friday, July 1, 2005 in Washington. O'Connor, the first woman on the Supreme Court and a swing vote on abortion as well as other contentious issues, announced her retirement Friday. A bruising Senate confirmation struggle loomed as President Bush selects a successor. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)

13 posted on 07/01/2005 8:36:36 AM PDT by alessandrofiaschi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 68skylark
Gonzales would have to recue himself on virtually everything in the coming months.

I just don't see it. Too many good reasons to keep him right where he is. Not least of which as I understand it that he doesn't really want the job.

If it's a hispanic, I think it will be Garza.

15 posted on 07/01/2005 8:37:11 AM PDT by The Iguana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 68skylark

Why not Ashcroft? He was Atty. Gen. too...Personally, I would love to see it as the pleasure of watching the reactor core at the DUmp melt down is just too wonderful to imagine!


16 posted on 07/01/2005 8:38:07 AM PDT by meandog (FOR LURKING DUers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 68skylark
The old curve baller just might go WASP - John Cornyn!
17 posted on 07/01/2005 8:39:11 AM PDT by gumboyaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 68skylark

Maybe Gonzalez goes down in flames as the sacrificial nominee, with Owens or Brown waiting to pick up the easy confirmation vote. I could live with that.


21 posted on 07/01/2005 8:43:15 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Linguine Spined Republican Senators Will Lose Their Majority!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 68skylark

It's really difficult to tell how a potential SCOTUS appointee might act until he gets on the bench. For one thing, he's bound by the Supreme Court's prior decisions in virtually everything he does up until that point, so the fact that he follows them proves nothing. And any intelligent conservative who has any hope of getting to the Supreme Court will be somewhat obscure about what he's really thinking until he gets onto the Court. Any justice with a demonstrable record of conservatism (particularly on abortion) has little hope of actually getting onto the Court.

If Bush appoints Gonzales, I'm guessing that it means he's satisfied that Gonzales will vote to overrule Roe if the opportunity arises. However, wishy-washy Bush may be on some issues, he is certainly not wishy-washy on abortion.


23 posted on 07/01/2005 8:43:35 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 68skylark

I know the perfect candidate. A black, latino, conservative, woman, with a brilliant mind, and impeachable credentials.

Anybody out there know of one? Of course, the Dems would have to destroy her, because, after all, they're only interested in Liberal Supreme Court Judges being appointed, not minorities. Libs may picture themselves as "tolerant", but they're not that tolerant.

Cry Havoc! Let loose the Dogs of War!


24 posted on 07/01/2005 8:43:39 AM PDT by Yankereb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 68skylark

If President Bush is really interested in making a landmark appointment (e.g., first Hispanic, first female African-American, etc.) he should nominate someone who isn't even a lawyer. I've often said that we could use a few clear-thinking engineers or accountants on the Court!


25 posted on 07/01/2005 8:45:33 AM PDT by Alberta's Child (I ain't got a dime, but what I got is mine. I ain't rich, but Lord I'm free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 68skylark

me too.

He is to wishy washy.

The LAST thing we need is another so called swing vote.

I anticipate the spineless republicans will cave into the democrat myth in exchance for a non existent nothing promise for a future "play nice" from democrats.

It is the nevel chamberlin scenario.


28 posted on 07/01/2005 8:48:06 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson