Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 68skylark

How 'bout we wait and see. The people have a great deal to say about the nomination. Sadly, we don't have much to say about the confirmation.


5 posted on 07/01/2005 8:32:04 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: anniegetyourgun
There are serious problems with the current make up the court; simply nominating a moderate because you want an Hispanic on the court to get more Hispanics in the republican column, would be extremely irresponsible.

O'Connor should be replaced with Robert Bork or a clone of him.
22 posted on 07/01/2005 8:43:18 AM PDT by coffeebreak (Judicial activism is destroying this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: anniegetyourgun
If Bill Kristol had a brain he could think.

It was all over Washington two years ago that Sandra Day O'Connor wanted to retire. It was also common knowledge in D.C. that after the 2002 election she told Bush she wanted to retire. Bush asked her to stay until after the 2004 election. She agreed. Bush felt certain he could get a better appointment confirmed in 2005 than he could in 2003.

Everyone in DC. knew this was going to happen. They were just waiting for an announcement. The Sandra Day O'Connor retirement in 2005 was printed in a lot of wire reports in 2003 and 2004. Kristal had no inside knowledge that every member of the Washington Press did not know a year or two ago. Everyone from Novak to Krauthammer printed stories that O'Connor was staying on until 2005 at the urging of President Bush. It was posted several times here on FreeRepublic.

To think that Bush would confide in anyone who would tell Kristal anything is beyond belief.

You can bet the farm that Kristal knows less than the average bear. You can also bet that the president has known for some time what was going to happen with retirements at the court. You can also bet the strategy to handle it has been decided for some time.

It is also true that the handful of people who know what the President is going to do have told no one. Insiders do not leak in this administration. The president makes sure he knows what various people know. Leakers soon find out that they were told stuff that only they were told. When they leak they get caught.. and if they get caught they are no longer insiders.

At the upper levels this administration does not leak. That is one of the reasons the media hates them.

The Democrats have to be careful not to do something that would cost them Rino and Dino support. If they do they will get the nuclear option and BAM.. they will be facing 20 years of conservative court. But if they go easy.. they will be facing 20 years of almost as conservative a supreme court. If they do block a Bush appointment no Democratic president will ever get a liberal confirmed again.

Republicans can't play hard ball first. But if deomcrats break the gentlemens agreement, then Republicans are free to do the same. I look for some Democrats to fold. I look for some of the RINOs to get a back bone. They were looking to play in the media sunshine of moderation.... only to feel the cold steel of the conservative knife pressing against their political backside.

It will be interesting to see what happens next.

Have you noticed that increasingly Trent Lott has become the spokesperson for Republicans in the Senate. I don't think Frist is calling any of the shots. I think the Senate Caucus decides and Lott is chosen as its spokesperson.

More and more the media is going to Lott and less and less to Frist. That is a sure indictaion of who they think is in control. It is a very interesting situation. It is certainly a different situation than I have ever witnessed.

32 posted on 07/01/2005 8:57:51 AM PDT by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson