Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

O'Connor to Retire From Supreme Court (Confirmation of Earlier Rumors; NEW INFO)
Washington Post ^ | 7/01/2005 | AP?Gina holland

Posted on 07/01/2005 7:40:16 AM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

WASHINGTON -- Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, the first woman appointed to the Supreme Court and a key swing vote on issues such as abortion and the death penalty, said Friday she is retiring.

O'Connor, 75, said she expects to leave before the start of the court's next term in October, or whenever the Senate confirms her successor. There was no immediate word from the White House on who might be nominated to replace O'Connor.

It's been 11 years since the last opening on the court, one of the longest uninterrupted stretches in history. O'Connor's decision gives Bush his first opportunity to appoint a justice.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: sandradayoconnor; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: nina0113

Not soon enough 'darlin!


21 posted on 07/01/2005 7:56:16 AM PDT by johnny7 (How often does a '47 Rodham require servicing?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

This is going to be one ugly fight!
With Rehnquist, the replacement probably would be the same, in the eyes of the opposition. With O'Connor, the opposition will see any Bush nominee as more conservative than her. Replacing O'Connor with an actual conservative will result in a real shift in the balance of the court...the left will not stand for it. This will be nasty.


22 posted on 07/01/2005 7:59:15 AM PDT by threeleftsmakearight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

...and Renquist, soon too; time to stick it in the RAT DUmmies and slowly, agonizingly twist and shred with the likes of Judge Roy Moore and more of that ilk!


23 posted on 07/01/2005 7:59:57 AM PDT by meandog (FOR LURKING DUers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Ted Olsen.


24 posted on 07/01/2005 8:01:58 AM PDT by Chunga
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MIT-Elephant
If he blows the nomination ...

If he had a record of doing that, I'd be worried. But considering that he's already nominated people like Estrada, Pickering, Brown, Owens, and Pryor for the circuit courts, I don't see him going squishy now for the Supreme Court.

25 posted on 07/01/2005 8:02:20 AM PDT by Dave Olson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Chunga
My thoughts exactly...

Excellent nomination...

26 posted on 07/01/2005 8:04:32 AM PDT by coder2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

First Sandra was more conservative than many people realize, she was one of the four on the correct side in the recent Kelo case. I don't think it will be Al, but it will be a hispanic, I think it will be this Judge Garza, from what I have read he isn't super conservative, but the thinking is he is more conservative than Sandra D. or Al


27 posted on 07/01/2005 8:04:46 AM PDT by jbwbubba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChadGore

Re:conservatives of the country will never forgive him and will turn their back on him for the next three years of his administration.

Who's side are you on ?



I'm on the side that voted twice for who I thought was a conservative president, and then watched in horror as he sold out education reform to Ted kennedy, sold out transportation reform to Norman Mineta, sold out immigration reform to the Hispanic vote and sold out Title IX reform to Julie Foudy and her gang of witches.

If we can't even get a good non-flipflopping SC Justice out of the deal all he'll have to show on the domestic front is tax cuts and the estate tax repeal. Slim pickings when you've got two branches in the majority.


28 posted on 07/01/2005 8:05:46 AM PDT by MIT-Elephant ("Armed with what? Spitballs?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

We're all gonna die!!!

AAAAHHH!!!

Given the President's support for internationalist treaties like CAFTA, LOST, for the Open Borders lobby, for CFR, and his tacit support for renewing the AWB if it should come across his desk... I can make a prediction where this will go, and I have the feeling many of us are going to be very dissapointed.

Bye bye soverignty!


29 posted on 07/01/2005 8:06:01 AM PDT by adam_az (It's the border, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
And you may be right. The RATS will filibuster like mad if Bush even thinks about appointing someone like Thomas and Scalia.

Someone suggested Ted Olsen. Another, Bork. Both good suggestions. Let's see who Bush will select.

He had better not, however, pick someone with appeasing the RATS in mind.

I've had enough of an out of control Supreme Court.

30 posted on 07/01/2005 8:06:36 AM PDT by Houmatt (Is it too much to ask for Tiffany to forgive my transgressions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Goodbye -   Busateri Pens
Goodbye!
31 posted on 07/01/2005 8:06:37 AM PDT by stocksthatgoup (Polls = Proof that when the MSM want your opinion they will give it to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Fierce Allegiance

I dont think that Alberto Gonzalez will get nominated, because who wants to eat Chimineychangas every day, not me.


32 posted on 07/01/2005 8:12:10 AM PDT by Right_at_RiceU (You don't need a gun to kill hippies, just soap or work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Dave Olson
If he had a record of doing that, I'd be worried. But considering that he's already nominated people like Estrada, Pickering, Brown, Owens, and Pryor for the circuit courts, I don't see him going squishy now for the Supreme CourtMy money is on Janice Rodgers Brown for O'Connor; and Priscilla Owens for Rehnquist. And the RATs will have a hard time bringing up their "extraordinary circumstances" clause seeing as how both were recently confirmed.
33 posted on 07/01/2005 8:15:34 AM PDT by meandog (FOR LURKING DUers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

It's going to be a very hot July/August in the political world. Get ready for nastiness like we've never before seen. This could be worse than the '04 election when this really gets going, of course everyone will be nice at the start of this process.

Grab some popcorn, this is gonna be good.


34 posted on 07/01/2005 8:19:24 AM PDT by KoRn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt

Who cares that the Dems will fight like mad.

You people act just like the Reps in the Senate. Oh, we must not make our "friends" mad, we'll just do this instead.

Not meaning you specifically, your statement just made me see red about catering to the madness of the dems. Well, we can get a little mad too and it is about time to quit worrying about what the dems will do.

We know what they will do, they will fight anything a conservative does. So, on to the next step, they can just get unmad same as they got mad, it will not temper our actions.


35 posted on 07/01/2005 8:30:36 AM PDT by ClancyJ (Life is a God-given inalienable right to all Americans - not just the chosen ones.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

Comment #36 Removed by Moderator

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Can't wait til the media starts campaigning for a "moderate" to "bring balance" to the court. Maybe they'll even suggest John McCain.


37 posted on 07/01/2005 8:34:32 AM PDT by ArcadeQuarters
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fierce Allegiance
Hey! Lighten up, Sandy baby!...


38 posted on 07/01/2005 8:36:18 AM PDT by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Right_at_RiceU

Sandra Day O'Connor is just about my favorite Justice. ...GHAD..


39 posted on 07/01/2005 8:40:56 AM PDT by small voice in the wilderness (Quick, act casual. If they sense scorn and ridicule, they'll flee..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

It's all up to McCain. He runs the senate.


40 posted on 07/01/2005 8:41:06 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Why can I never think of a tagline?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson