You know... that is the track record. I tend to agree with you. I would love to be proven wrong here. In fact I'm praying that I'm wrong.... but I think you're right.
I agree with you; you're fears are valid. Bush and the Senate Pubs have had a miserable record with all things conservative...it's hard to believe we have a majority in both houses - we've nothing to show for it.
Are you even reading my replies? You just admitted what I stated! Good grief. I stated you have an interest in bashing 41 and without RECORD stating 43 is just like him, but ignore Reagan's appointments. I stated you evidently had an agenda, and I'm correct.
Reagan gave us two Justices that ruled against the Ten Commandments and eminent domain.
I'm "shooting the messenger" because you are basing you opinions on Bush on nothing but your "feelings". You cannot point to an instance he has caved on the Judiciary. I am "shooting the messanger" because you seem content to ignore another Republican President's contributions to the court's balance.
Nevermind. Slime them as you wish. But it's evident what your agenda is.
Should be noted that the rason Bush 41 couldn't keep his no new taxes pledge was because the democrats (i think Gephardt specifically) would not allow any money for our troops in Iraq during Desert Storm unless he raised taxes. Bush 41 was in a catch 22, his shouldn't have made the promise because the democrats no doubt were just waiting for a choice opportunity to try and get him to break that promise. W seems to have learned from his daddy's mistakes, let's hope the same holds true with the Supreme Court Nominations.