Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fox News reporting that Sandra Day O'Connor retiring!
Fox News | 7/1/05 | SueRae

Posted on 07/01/2005 7:14:03 AM PDT by SueRae

Hearing on Fox News


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism
KEYWORDS: 1down6togo; filibustertime; herewego; oconnor; retirement; sandradayoconnor; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,021-1,0401,041-1,0601,061-1,080 ... 1,281-1,297 next last
To: GoldwaterChick

More than a few.

But, who knows, maybe they can learn something.


1,041 posted on 07/01/2005 11:54:53 AM PDT by Koan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1038 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.

Which I why I voted against him in this last election. It was very sad to see him today. He is a very forceful speaker and he seemed to be having trouble getting his thoughts together, hesitating, seemed a bit unsure. Hope it's just a temporary effect of his chemo.


1,042 posted on 07/01/2005 11:55:59 AM PDT by GoldwaterChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 982 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl

Your understanding is incorrect. Nixon was not impeached.


1,043 posted on 07/01/2005 11:56:56 AM PDT by SittinYonder (America is the Last Beach)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1018 | View Replies]

To: GoldwaterChick

I am way over 55 dear. My children now include anyone under 60. LOL!


1,044 posted on 07/01/2005 11:57:17 AM PDT by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1039 | View Replies]

To: Koan
Scalia will be named Chief Justice, and his strict-constructionist position will rule the day.

It isn't as though the Chief Justice gets an extra vote or anything...what IS the big deal about being Chief Justice anyway?

1,045 posted on 07/01/2005 11:57:25 AM PDT by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1022 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

Re Kennedy -- and BTW O'Connor, when Mark Levin was on a local radio talk show about his book, a caller asked why they so often shift to the left once they're in (I've read that Kennedy in particular was a reliable conservative when appointed), he said his observation was that judges (esp. USSC) who center their social life in Washington with the "beautiful people" (as Howie Carr would say) tend to shift. The ones who don't -- like Scalia and Thomas -- don't.


1,046 posted on 07/01/2005 11:58:35 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 916 | View Replies]

To: SittinYonder

Are you a lawyer or a legislator?

Would a lawyer please weigh in on the issue. I think impeached means accused or charged. Sittin thinks it means successfully convicted.

I am going on eighth grade civics and my memory of Watergate and the Clintons.


1,047 posted on 07/01/2005 11:58:51 AM PDT by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1043 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom; onyx; eyespysomething

Coburn, who sits on the judiciary committee, was on the phone with Fox News just now and said he wouldn't tell the president who to appoint but that Pryor would be a good one.


1,048 posted on 07/01/2005 11:59:10 AM PDT by SittinYonder (America is the Last Beach)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 978 | View Replies]

To: Dianna

Ah, the articles were never voted on, right!

thanks


1,049 posted on 07/01/2005 11:59:40 AM PDT by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1037 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl; sittnick; ninenot; saradippity; Siobhan; ArrogantBustard; onyx; Cap'n Crunch; ...
Do you suppose that 33 years and 45 million sliced, diced and hamburgerized innocent babies since Herod Blackmun discovered a hitherto unnoticed right to kill innocent babies in the Constitution or wherever is an indication that social conservatives have been too impatient with the process of ending the baby-killing while there were "more important things" like cutting your taxes to attend to?

Social conservatives are not going anywhere. The message of the last three decades in American politics is that right-to-life is the central issue of American politics. Its advocates are Republicans. Its enemies are Demonrats. AND the "moderates" will be roadkill.

Either RTL wins now or, from a position of controlling the GOP and its primaries and nominating procedures, we keep on the task of preventing "moderates" from nomination to the Senate or White House as Republicans, keep on electing RTL folks, keep on stripping Demonrats of electoral vgotes and Senate seats until RTL DOES WIN. This dogged determination (methodology) is in the ancient DNA of the GOP going back to the abolitionists who created the GOP.

If you want to leave the GOP and the conservative movement, leave. If not, not. Lead, follow or get out of the way on Right to Life than which there is NO MORE IMPORTANT ISSUE until permanently resolved in favor of the babies.

There are still plenty of people who, generally for reasons of ancestry or economic condition, STILL think themselves Democrats while being pro-war, pro-military, pro-life, pro-family, against taxes on people of modest means, pro-gun, pro-property, anti-regulation, pro-SMALL business and a lot of other things ordinarily thought to be Republican.

Every ancestral Muffy and Skipper at yacht club or polo club turned from the GOP into the Demonrat Party by the GOP pro-life and pro-family and pro-gun positions will be replaced by ten new "reagan Democrats" entering the GOP.

Don't be so quick to imagine that social conservatives will abandon the GOP to the soulless Muffies and Skippers. This is not Muffy's great, great granddaddy's GOP and it never will be again.

1,050 posted on 07/01/2005 12:00:33 PM PDT by BlackElk (Dean of Discipline of the Tomas de Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: george wythe

I am not digging, clarifying.


1,051 posted on 07/01/2005 12:00:54 PM PDT by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1033 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl
Are you a lawyer or a legislator?

Geez louise! I don't need to be a lawyer to know how to read. Look it up for yourself.

I never said "successfully convicted" and don't misstate what I've said. I said Nixon was not impeached because you said Nixon was impeached.

Clinton was impeached.

I am going on eighth grade civics and my memory of Watergate and the Clintons.

Then find better sources.

1,052 posted on 07/01/2005 12:01:47 PM PDT by SittinYonder (America is the Last Beach)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1047 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl

I'll never see 70 again! And soon it will be 71--but it's been a great trip so far.


1,053 posted on 07/01/2005 12:02:22 PM PDT by GoldwaterChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1044 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl

Senior momemt--should have said 72--guess my brain is failing after all :)


1,054 posted on 07/01/2005 12:04:43 PM PDT by GoldwaterChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1044 | View Replies]

To: SittinYonder

You won dear, now don't get your BP high right now.


1,055 posted on 07/01/2005 12:06:52 PM PDT by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1052 | View Replies]

To: GoldwaterChick

Heh heh!


1,056 posted on 07/01/2005 12:07:19 PM PDT by cajungirl (no)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1054 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk


I think POTUS fully understands the gravity of his nominations. He's going for the gold.


1,057 posted on 07/01/2005 12:08:50 PM PDT by onyx (Pope John Paul II - May 18, 1920 - April 2, 2005 = SANTO SUBITO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1050 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
We just have to send both Granholm and her judge to private practice in 06.

That's the spirit Dan!

1,058 posted on 07/01/2005 12:09:29 PM PDT by apackof2 (In my simple way, I guess you could say I'm living in the BIG TIME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1010 | View Replies]

To: SittinYonder


LOL! I like Coburn. Thanks for that info -- I need to go watch a little TV and do some packing.


1,059 posted on 07/01/2005 12:09:47 PM PDT by onyx (Pope John Paul II - May 18, 1920 - April 2, 2005 = SANTO SUBITO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1048 | View Replies]

To: Dianna
It isn't as though the Chief Justice gets an extra vote or anything...what IS the big deal about being Chief Justice anyway?

The big deal is that the chief justice assigns the cases to various associate justices, thus trying to shape decisions by putting the right players in the right place.

1,060 posted on 07/01/2005 12:11:32 PM PDT by mwl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1045 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,021-1,0401,041-1,0601,061-1,080 ... 1,281-1,297 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson