Skip to comments.
If it's property they want, it's property they'll get
The Free Liberal ^
| June 29, 2005
| Stephen Gordon
Posted on 06/30/2005 8:33:04 AM PDT by Georgia_JimD
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-105 next last
To: 45Auto
The Constitution hasn't been valid since at least 1861, so what is the big deal?
21
posted on
06/30/2005 10:06:22 AM PDT
by
Little Ray
(I'm a reactionary, hirsute, gun-owning, knuckle dragging, Christian Neanderthal and proud of it!)
To: 45Auto
"to be replaced by?"
We'll probably all be speaking Chinese.
Carolyn
22
posted on
06/30/2005 10:07:03 AM PDT
by
CDHart
(The world has become a lunatic asylum and the lunatics are in charge.)
To: lentulusgracchus
Lawrence & Garner v. State of TexasThe U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that sodomy laws are unconstitutional on June 26, 2003.
The majority opinion is based on privacy rights and is written by Kennedy, joined by Breyer, Souter, Ginsburg, and Stephens. O'Connor concurred on equal protection grounds.
23
posted on
06/30/2005 10:10:11 AM PDT
by
45Auto
(Big holes are (almost) always better.)
To: Wolfie
I would suggest that any document whose meaning was to be determined at a later date by 9 lifetime political appointees was never a contract in the first place.Will the judiciary in this country ever be held accountable for these illegal activities?
24
posted on
06/30/2005 10:11:34 AM PDT
by
houeto
("Mr. President , close our borders now!")
To: Little Ray
... so what is the big deal? Well, yeah. But, we kinda want it back. You know? We are trying to do what we can when we can.
25
posted on
06/30/2005 10:12:35 AM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(Never underestimate the will of the downtrodden to lie flatter.)
To: Travis McGee
26
posted on
06/30/2005 10:13:30 AM PDT
by
Lurker
(It's time we stop children what's that sound? Everybody look what's going down.)
To: houeto
Doubtful. Besides, it'd be real hard proving the SC did anything illegal, when they were just doing what they're empowered to do.
27
posted on
06/30/2005 10:15:45 AM PDT
by
Wolfie
To: Wolfie
" when they were just doing what they're empowered to do.
"
They are empowered to ignore the Constitution and make law as they see fit?
To: Dead Corpse
They ain't gonna give it back.
Any attempt at a Constitutional Convention would likely be disaster, producing some sort of horrid cross between the EU constitution and various UN Resolutions.
The last resort is Civil War and, well, we saw how the last one went...
29
posted on
06/30/2005 10:18:49 AM PDT
by
Little Ray
(I'm a reactionary, hirsute, gun-owning, knuckle dragging, Christian Neanderthal and proud of it!)
To: Mr. Nobody
The Supreme Court determines what the Constitution "means". Stupid system. Our ancestors were suckers to fall for it.
30
posted on
06/30/2005 10:20:29 AM PDT
by
Wolfie
To: Little Ray
The last resort is Civil War and, well, we saw how the last one went... Yeah... but at least I wouldn't be around to see the downfall of the Country I loved.
31
posted on
06/30/2005 10:20:53 AM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(Never underestimate the will of the downtrodden to lie flatter.)
To: Little Ray
That's the part that amuses. "Call a Constitutional Convention!". Can you imagine what sort of insanity would come out of that?
32
posted on
06/30/2005 10:21:31 AM PDT
by
Wolfie
To: Mr. Nobody
They are empowered to interpret the Constitution and they interpreted "public use" to include tax revenue generated from the property.
Evil beyond belief, but consistent with the socialist slant you find on the USSC
33
posted on
06/30/2005 10:23:30 AM PDT
by
Little Ray
(I'm a reactionary, hirsute, gun-owning, knuckle dragging, Christian Neanderthal and proud of it!)
To: Wolfie
Doubtful. Besides, it'd be real hard proving the SC did anything illegal, when they were just doing what they're empowered to do.I doubt it too but, they are not empowered to do what they did. They are merely a check to keep the legislature from enacting unconstitutional laws. That's it. Period.
Coming up with a new definition of what is is, should be an impeachable offense.
34
posted on
06/30/2005 10:25:49 AM PDT
by
houeto
("Mr. President , close our borders now!")
To: Wolfie
I just did... all the wackiness, political correctness, and socialist BS you find in documents like the UN "Rights of the Child" and the EU Constitution. Rather than defining and limiting the powers of the State, they would try to assign rights to people (by various grievance groups, of course) and end up leaving us with no rights at all.
35
posted on
06/30/2005 10:27:05 AM PDT
by
Little Ray
(I'm a reactionary, hirsute, gun-owning, knuckle dragging, Christian Neanderthal and proud of it!)
To: houeto
Coming up with a new definition of what is is, should be an impeachable offense. Amen.
36
posted on
06/30/2005 10:27:36 AM PDT
by
Dead Corpse
(Never underestimate the will of the downtrodden to lie flatter.)
To: Travis McGee
The precedence has been set by the SC...it will take a carefully orchestrated (and financed) attempt. The the local government of Weare seems to be willing to entertain the idea. It may not succeed but it should make them flinch next time...
37
posted on
06/30/2005 10:34:32 AM PDT
by
in the Arena
(CAPT (USAF) James Wayne Herrick, Jr. (Call Sign: FireFly33). MIA Laos 27 Oct 69)
To: Travis McGee
The leftist bastards in black robes, are either ignorant of the fire they have ignited....or that was their objective...
How many more straws must be placed upon the citizen, before we have reached "the last straw"?
It appears that the last four decades of leftist educrates, politicians, Follywood and inherently stupid citizens have had the desired effect...
OUR Constitution is NOT subject to change or erasure by the bench....it in NOT a pretty blue dress as one Kalifornicate Congress Critter thought of it as.....to be changed as the freaking mood struck her...
The leftist bastards on the Court, in Congress and in our State Legislatures are the dangerous ENEMY WITHIN.....just as dangerous as the Islamanazi Lunatics....
Semper Fi
38
posted on
06/30/2005 10:45:08 AM PDT
by
river rat
(You may turn the other cheek, but I prefer to look into my enemy's vacant dead eyes.)
To: adam_az; Georgia_JimD
Fresh compost is dirt too.. Every time that I've purchased topsoil, it seems to contain pigshiite. Seems to me that this is what ought to be sent.
Oh, and the percentage of the shiite is quite variable. :>)
To: Travis McGee
Matt,
If you jump through all of the loops, and carefully document every word uttered by both sides during the process there is always a way to get the job done.
The fine group of gentlemen we elected to represent us have provided all the tools. Whenever a group of people assemble for the purpose of harming others, the RICO statutes will most likely provide a way to resolve the conflict to the satisfaction of all except the perpetrators.
Try it, you will like it. I know it worked for me! :<)
Semper Fi
40
posted on
06/30/2005 10:53:06 AM PDT
by
An Old Man
(USMC 1956 1960)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-105 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson