Skip to comments.
Black Men Attacked in Queens Neighborhood
My Way News ^
| 6/30/05
| AP
Posted on 06/30/2005 4:56:10 AM PDT by Abathar
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-189 next last
To: Abathar
it is wrong I know but I just can't seem to work up a tear for them either. Why is it wrong? Some car thieves got beaten. I regard that as a good thing.
21
posted on
06/30/2005 5:11:57 AM PDT
by
neutrino
(Globalization “is the economic treason that dare not speak its name.” (173))
To: ko_kyi
Unless the attackers somehow knew what these guys were thinking (impossible) then their intention to steal a car is meaningless.
The fact that guido went to get a couple of friends before jumping these guys makes it pre-meditated.
Howard Beach has changed in complexion since the 80s but the new-comers are not black. The prototypical guido-hitter mentality is still there (obviously) but this blatant action surprises me.
22
posted on
06/30/2005 5:12:06 AM PDT
by
wtc911
(Rocky Sullivan died a coward.)
To: Abathar
Notice how the title of this article automatically make the back men the victims? Here, let me rewrite the title as it should be:
"Government Declares War on Black Crime: 7% of the Population Commits 60% of The Violent Rapes, Robberies and Murders....Law Abiding Citizens Fed Up"
To: Abathar
You have admitted car thieves giving their side of the story but we don't hear the accused's side.
Watch.
This will go to court. The facts will be laid out and the kid will be acquitted.
Then there'll be a riot because all people will remember is the BS printed from the AP.
24
posted on
06/30/2005 5:12:43 AM PDT
by
Conservomax
(There are no solutions, only trade-offs.)
To: Abathar
"Three black men who ventured into a historically white neighborhood early Wednesday to steal a car..."
And the point?
25
posted on
06/30/2005 5:12:54 AM PDT
by
toddlintown
(Your papers please.)
To: Abathar
Without a doubt Mayor Blooming-idiot is a hopeless panderer.
26
posted on
06/30/2005 5:12:54 AM PDT
by
OldFriend
(AMERICAN WARS SET MEN FREE)
To: ko_kyi
I'm sure the three black Car Thieves backed down when this kid came at them with a bat.
27
posted on
06/30/2005 5:14:07 AM PDT
by
Conservomax
(There are no solutions, only trade-offs.)
To: Abathar
Three white men who ventured into a historically black neighborhood early Wednesday to steal a car were chased by a man with a baseball bat, police said. One man was beaten and suffered a fractured skull. Mayor Bloomberg will formally recognize the heroism of the bat wielder with a Keys to the City award at City Hall on Friday. Governor Pataki will attend and issue a State Proclamation commending the baseball skills of NYC citizens who fight crime in their neighborhood streets with nothing but Louisville sluggers.
28
posted on
06/30/2005 5:14:11 AM PDT
by
hflynn
To: 26lemoncharlie
[[The Hate Crimes Laws are nothing more than the implementation of the Values set forth in the European Socialist Manefesto. They undermine our Gurantee of Freedom of Speech by the Constitution.]]
Hate crimes laws are designed only to silence the white majority population.
To: Abathar
This is the most bizarrely written story I've ever seen the AP put out. Guys give some justice to thieves and it's a hate crime and written as a racial column?
30
posted on
06/30/2005 5:14:40 AM PDT
by
Vision
(When Hillary Says She's Going To Put The Military On Our Borders...She Becomes Our Next President)
To: biblewonk
The SUV guy probably had a cell phone and could have called the cops.I'm with you. Unless the black guys were actually committing a crime, what we have here is a senseless assault (not a hate crime, just a senseless assault). They'd have gotten off easier if a car was actually being stolen.
31
posted on
06/30/2005 5:14:45 AM PDT
by
SlowBoat407
(Taglines are supposed to have meaning?)
To: SlowBoat407
I said I don't believe in prosecuting hate crimes. I meant I don't believe in classifying a crime as a hate crime. It should be prosecuted as assault and battery. "Why" is pointless. Well, not pointless -- it should be mentioned by a prosecutor during trial as (part of) motive, and during sentencing when determining the likelihood for rehabilitation. However, I do agree that there shouldn't be separate charges or extra penalties for "hate crimes".
32
posted on
06/30/2005 5:15:44 AM PDT
by
kevkrom
(“It’s good to remember whom people turn to when they’re desperate — and it ain’t Kofi Annan.”)
To: kevkrom
"Yeah, I don't get this... "
Next time you hear the NAACP call for a 'hate crime' law you will understand what that means. The idea is that some crimes are politically correct(mainly those ones against you) and some are not.
33
posted on
06/30/2005 5:16:17 AM PDT
by
marylandrepub1
(Social Security: The payroll taxes are the only part guaranteed !)
To: kevkrom
Wonder what the rap sheet looks like on the perps?
34
posted on
06/30/2005 5:18:02 AM PDT
by
MudSlide
To: Abathar
Criminal possession of a weapon? Since when is possessing a baseball bat criminal? Why don't they go arrest the NY Yankees while they're at it?
To: Abathar
The three blacks told investigators they had been looking for a car to steal when they entered the Howard Beach neighborhood.In other words, this lowlife scumbag criminal Minucci assaulted another lowlife scumbag criminal.
Watch this turn into a citywide days of rage with the Reverend Al Sharpton leading a Million Car Thief March.
36
posted on
06/30/2005 5:19:17 AM PDT
by
wideawake
(God bless our brave troops and their Commander in Chief)
To: toothfairy86
Since when is possessing a baseball bat criminal?Since someone used it to attack another person. Then it becomes a weapon.
37
posted on
06/30/2005 5:19:58 AM PDT
by
SlowBoat407
(Taglines are supposed to have meaning?)
To: Abathar
They should be brining up the other 2 thieves on Good Samaritan laws.
The kid had a bat, not an Uzi.
Pussies.
38
posted on
06/30/2005 5:20:38 AM PDT
by
Conservomax
(There are no solutions, only trade-offs.)
To: SlowBoat407
They'd have gotten off easier if a car was actually being stolen.How do you know they were not in the process of stealing a car?
39
posted on
06/30/2005 5:21:35 AM PDT
by
alnick
("I will continue to be guided by the advice that matters." GWB 6/28/05)
To: SlowBoat407
I'm with you. Unless the black guys were actually committing a crime, what we have here is a senseless assault (not a hate crime, just a senseless assault). They'd have gotten off easier if a car was actually being stolen. Even in the bible where the laws are much more conservative, someone has to be on your property for you to be able to go thrash him. You don't get to go out on patrol. Even the cops aren't at liberty to thrash people when they actually ARE on patrol.
40
posted on
06/30/2005 5:22:20 AM PDT
by
biblewonk
(If you don't get the bible, how can you be a Christian?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 181-189 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson