Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China Secretly Constructing an Aircraft Carrier(54planes,13choppers,deployment in 2008)
Chosun Ilbo ^ | 06/30/05 | Song Ui-dal

Posted on 06/29/2005 5:33:55 PM PDT by TigerLikesRooster

/begin my translation

China Secretly Constructing an Aircraft Carrier

Hong Kong Economic Daily(Jing-ji-ri-bao) reports
2005/06/30

China recently completed the final design for an Chinese aircraft carrier, and start in early August to construct it in secret at Jiang-nan Shipyard, Zhang-xing Island near Shanghai, reported the June 29th issue of Hong Kong Economic Daily(Jing-ji-ri-bao,) quoting (Chinese) high-level military sources.

Costing 3 billion yuan(390 million dollars), which takes up 3% of Chinese military budget, this carrier, due to be completed next year if everything goes well, has top speed 30 knots per hour and  its maximal displacement is 78,000 ton. It is equipped with Russian engines and radars.

It will carry 54 fighter planes and 13 anti-submarine helicopters, and the introduction of latest Russian fighters(Su-33) is also in the works. When it would be in service in 2008, it is expected to boost Chinese naval strength.

The paper reports, "Zhang Guang-qin, vice minister of the Commission of Science, Technology and Industry for National Defense, denied the rumor that a carrier is under construction. However, he emphasized  it is the sacred duty of the Chinese navy to safeguard the country's sovereignty of territorial waters. It is in this context which they go for the construction of the carrier."

(Song Ui-dal, reporting from Hong Kong)

/end my translation



TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2008; aircraft; armsbuildup; carrier; chicoms; china; chinesemilitary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-202 next last
Comment #41 Removed by Moderator

To: Dog Gone

Depends on who you ask. I guess I should say "cheap labor", not "slave labor".


42 posted on 06/29/2005 6:00:04 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity ("A litany of complaints is not a plan." -- G.W. Bush, regarding Sen. Kerry's lack of vision)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Were you PACFLT? The sea can be calm, but I cede your point it is not often. 30 knots is still slow, they can't even outrun a destroyer at that speed. Our Nukes can haul a** and even launch with a tail wind.

Do we still keep a carrier in Japan? I recall we had the Kitty or the Ranger there when I was in because the Japanese did not like nukes in their harbor. I bet that attitude changes in a hurry!

43 posted on 06/29/2005 6:01:11 PM PDT by kerryusama04 (God Bless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: All
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/china/cv.htm

"...The carrier is surrounded with heavy security in Dalian, which bars civilian access; police flank the shipyard entrance. This fueled speculation that the Varyag is being used by the Chinese military. It is not evident that China could actually turn Varyag into an active military warship, since he is badly deteriorated. Presently 70 percent complete, Varyag displaces about 33,600 tons [versus the 67,000-ton design displacement]. Varyag no longer has the nuclear reactors that were installed by the Ukrainian state-run Generating Systems of Crimea. Electronics were either never fitted or removed before he was sold.

In May 2000 the Tianma Shipbreaking Company in Tianjin purchased the Kiev from Russia. While the initial contract required that the ship be scrapped, the contract was renogatiated so that the Kiev would become a tourist attraction at the Beiyang Recreation Harbor.

Phase 2 - New Construction

China appears to have chosen to build a Chinese aircraft carrier, rather than purchasing one off-the-shelf. Although China’s long-term goal is to acquire one or more aircraft carriers and it has an active program to develop a design, it remains unclear whether Beijing has reached a firm decision on the kind of carrier it will have, given budget constraints and naval funding priorities.

The PLA Navy will need to overcome several large obstacles before it can field an operational aircraft carrier and associated supporting ships. First, the PLA Navy does not have any carrier-capable aircraft. Second, although substantially improved in these areas, it still needs more and better antisubmarine and antiaircraft capabilities to protect a carrier and its supporting vessels. Finally, to have adequate power projection capabilities from the use of a carrier, it is preferable to have more than one carrier so that a carrier is assuming the mission at sea at all times. Thus, many experts have concluded that an operational aircraft carrier does not appear to be in China's near future, even though China is funding research and development and training officers in aircraft carrier operations.

According to one Russian report, China plans to build an aircraft carrier with a displacement of between 40,000 to 60,000 tons. The feasibility study and draft design of China's aircraft carrier started in 1992. According to Russian sources, China began work on its own carrier in 1999 at Shanghai Shipyard. This carrier, code named "9985 plan" or "Project 9935," would have a 48,000 ton displacement, capable of carrying 30-40 fighter jets, most of which would be multi-functional SU-30MKK jets bought from Russia. The first carrier of purely Chinese design, the ship could have a built-in vertical anti-air and anti-ship missile launching system. China had reportedly started work on naval bases and harbors in Shanghai, Zanjiang and Dalian to improve docking facilities for this carrier. The plan for China's first light and conventional powered aircraft carrier was estimated to cost around 4.8 billion yuan, with authorities reportedly having already allocated one billion yuan for the first phase of the project. The aircraft carrier was expected to be launched in 2003 and to officially go into service in around 2005. From then on, it was estimated that China will be able to build a new aircraft carrier at an interval of every three years. If started in 1999, this carrier was expected to be completed by 2006. As of mid-2004 there were no credible reports of the start of construction of such a ship.

While these reports continue to persist, they appear to be based on rumor and speculation, which despite repeated efforts, have gone unverified. For instance, the multiple aircraft carrier that China is reported to be building, are all said to be under construction at the same time at a shipyard in Shanghai, which is also enclosed, to prevent observation. Though efforts to identify a building or structure of this size have not yielded any results.

China has apparently decided to postpone commissioning of its first aircraft carrier until no earlier than 2010.

The formation of an experimental fleet centered on such a carrier would take another three to four years. Based on the experience of other countries, it seems that that China would start building 10,000 ton cruisers to be convoy ships. It is also possible that China will purchase such cruisers directly from overseas, most likely the "Ukraine," a missile cruiser from Ukraine, which is now 93% completed, and then build China's own similar cruisers modeled on the "Ukraine."

Helicopters from a carrier could provide support to potential amphibious operations; fixed-wing aircraft operating from a carrier could provide greater air defense over a potential beachhead. If China were to build or purchase an aircraft carrier, such an asset would enable it to provide increased air defense and support for amphibious operations. The proposed Chinese aircraft carrier could be a vessel of 40,000-50,000 tons of displacement, one similar to the French "De Gaulle-Class" nuclear-powered aircraft carrier. Given the complexities of developing a new naval reactor considerably larger than the type used on PRC nuclear submarines and that a very long range is not required, conventional steam boilers would be adequate for a Chinese aircraft carrier. Russian designed steam turbines could give the carrier a top speed of 30 knots. The vessels might carry 24 combat aircraft, such as the Sukhoi-30MKK launched by a ski-jump. Below deck might be two missile launchers housing 24 missiles, either the Russian SSN-22 Sunburn or the more advanced Yakhont. China is also reported to be working on a land-attack cruise missile to be mounted on the vessel. China would probably build a carrier at the Shanghai Jiangnan Shipyard.

44 posted on 06/29/2005 6:01:11 PM PDT by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Here's a story that should make you feel tingly all over:

Under H-2A, shepherds are legally bound to one employer, and pay is relatively low -- in Colorado $700 a month, well below the minimum wage.

45 posted on 06/29/2005 6:01:51 PM PDT by raybbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: GBA

Probably a long, long time ago. Longer than I care to admit, anyway! :-(


46 posted on 06/29/2005 6:02:40 PM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Fitzcarraldo

In early 1998 a Macau-based company, Chin Lot Tourist and Amusement Agency bought the Varyag for $20 million dollars, with the announced intent of turning it into a floating amusement park and gambling casino in Macau. The contract with Ukraine stipulated that the buyer can't use the carrier for military purposes, and that any equipment that could be used to build other warships were removed from the craft. In 1999 a respected Hong Kong periodical reported that British and French companies had made Beijing an offer to equip the Varyag with many of the systems needed to make it operational.

In March 2002, following a significant delay by Turkish authorities who denied the carrier passage through the Bosporus Strait, the Varyag arrived in Dalian.

Chong Lot is a subsidary a Hong Kong firm called Chinluck (Holding). Chong Lot was also connected to another Hong Kong company, Goldspot Investments Ltd. All three firms had connections with former People's Liberation Army officials. Directors of Chinluck were reported to have ties to the Chinese Navy, though Chinluck denied any People's Liberation Army involvement in the sale of the Varyag. Three of the five directors of Chinluck Holding, the parent company of Chong Lot, are Chinese nationals from Shandong, which happens to be the home of the Chinese navy's North sea fleet. Chinluck (Holding) Co. Ltd. does not have any public presence, and Chong Lot carried a non-existent address in Macau.


47 posted on 06/29/2005 6:02:47 PM PDT by Flavius ("... we should reconnoitre assiduosly... " Vegetius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

Comment #48 Removed by Moderator

To: TigerLikesRooster

We can only hope that they used the French marine architects in designing the flight deck.


49 posted on 06/29/2005 6:04:25 PM PDT by Redleg Duke (Getting old sucks, but it is the only viable option!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; All

How many planes do our largest carriers carry?


50 posted on 06/29/2005 6:05:10 PM PDT by Quix (LOVE NEVER FAILS.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kerryusama04
Were you PACFLT?

Nope, LANTFLT.

Do we still keep a carrier in Japan?

Yes. The Kitty Hawk and her battle group.

51 posted on 06/29/2005 6:05:18 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Quix
How many planes do our largest carriers carry?

Around 80 at full load.

52 posted on 06/29/2005 6:06:45 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Ping


53 posted on 06/29/2005 6:07:56 PM PDT by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM 53 : 1 The ( FOOL ) hath said in his heart , There is no GOD .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

54 posted on 06/29/2005 6:08:39 PM PDT by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Head into a 20 knot wind at 30 knots and you have the equivilent of 50 knots of wind over your deck. That's how they do it.

All the wind US Carriers need is generated by the speed of the carrier and they do not even need all that really. The catapult launches the plane.
55 posted on 06/29/2005 6:09:34 PM PDT by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: GBA; hedgetrimmer
I wonder when we will start taking the Chinese seriously. The companies I used to work for gave away the farm to set up manufacturing and distribution in China and I keep wondering when that short sightedness will come back to haunt us.

Not to mention the fact that 80% of Wal-mart's products are made in China, by special contract with the retailer.

56 posted on 06/29/2005 6:09:44 PM PDT by La Enchiladita (Remembering our Heroes today and every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse

I'm sure they'll have plenty of replacements for "retired" deck crewmen. I wouldn't be surprised if they have a medical team standing by to harvest organs.


57 posted on 06/29/2005 6:11:01 PM PDT by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: handy old one

No doubt about that. This puppy won't spend a second at sea that we won't have an SSN on it's rear end.


58 posted on 06/29/2005 6:14:20 PM PDT by HRoarke ("There cannot be an absence of moral content in American foreign policy,..We are not Europe")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Well, if they build this carrier the way the make all the other crap they export, we have nothing to worry about.


59 posted on 06/29/2005 6:14:43 PM PDT by La Enchiladita (Remembering our Heroes today and every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quix

Look here -- nice read.

The USS Reagan e.g., is nearly 40% larger, faster, more lethal and better protected. AND much better at AirOps ;-)


60 posted on 06/29/2005 6:15:28 PM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-202 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson