Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. military says can defeat nuclear-armed N.Korea
Reuters ^ | Jack Kim | Jun 29, 2005

Posted on 06/29/2005 6:06:47 AM PDT by Alex Marko

SEOUL (Reuters) - U.S. and South Korean forces can deter and defeat North Korea even if the reclusive communist state has several nuclear weapons, a senior U.S. military officer said in an interview broadcast on Wednesday.

Amid growing signs stalled six-country talks on those weapons could restart, South Korea's foreign minister said regional powers trying to coax North Korea back to the table should anticipate a possible resumption of the process.

Seoul sent its unification minister to Washington on Wednesday for talks with senior U.S. officials including Vice President Dick Cheney on the nuclear crisis.

The commander of the U.S. forces in South Korea, General Leon LaPorte, said the U.S. military believed North Korea had one to two nuclear weapons at a minimum, and was also working to advance its missile program.

"Whether North Korea has one or several nuclear weapons does not change the balance on the peninsula," LaPorte told South Korea's PBC radio in an interview taped on Tuesday, according to a transcript provided by the station.

"The U.S. and the Republic of Korea retain our ability to deter North Korean aggression and, if required, to decisively defeat the North Korean threat if they were to threaten South Korea," he said.

LaPorte said the United States was fully committed to talks aimed at ending the North's nuclear weapons programs and sought a diplomatic solution to the crisis. Those talks involve the two Koreas, China, Japan, Russia and the United States.

LaPorte's comments may cause North Korea to try to draw more attention to its nuclear program through boasts or perhaps more provocative measures, an analyst said.

"North Korea may try to create new tensions by prodding neighboring countries and trying to re-alert them about its nuclear capabilities," said Jeung Young-tae from the Korea Institute for National Unification.

MISSILE PROGRAMME

U.S. officials have repeatedly said Washington has no intention of attacking the North.

LaPorte also said the U.S. military believed the North had a substantial missile program, which included long-range intercontinental ballistic missiles that could hit the mainland United States if the North succeeded in increasing their power.

North Korea said in February it possessed nuclear weapons and was boycotting the six-party talks, but recently has shown signs it may return to the table.

North Korean leader Kim Jong-il told visiting South Korea Unification Minister Chung Dong-young this month his country was prepared to return to negotiations if certain conditions were met, such as Washington treating Pyongyang as a genuine partner.

South Korean Foreign Minister Ban Ki-moon told a news conference on Wednesday the five countries working to bring the North back to the table had been encouraged by Kim's comments.

"Considering these, I believe it will be desirable for the North to return to the talks without further delay, and it is also probably worth anticipating it," Ban said.

Ri Gun, a senior North Korean diplomat involved in the six-way talks, has received permission from Washington to attend a seminar later this week in New York, where he may also meet U.S. officials, experts said.

"As far as the U.S. is concerned, the ball is in North Korea's court," B.C. Koh, a North Korea expert at the University of Illinois at Chicago, wrote in recent research paper.

Seoul has devised a huge economic assistance offer to boost many parts of the North Korean economy if the nuclear impasse is resolved, South Korean media have reported.

On Tuesday, Russia's Interfax news agency quoted a North Korean diplomatic source as saying Pyongyang was preparing to return to the table in the second half of July. Ban declined to comment on that report.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: asia; kimjongil; nortkorea; southkorea

1 posted on 06/29/2005 6:06:47 AM PDT by Alex Marko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Alex Marko


Would we expect them to say anything less?


2 posted on 06/29/2005 6:11:59 AM PDT by in hoc signo vinces ("Soylent Green is People!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Marko



There's no need to fight them...just nuke kimi ills bunker along with the nuclear sites!!! the war will end before it even starts!!!


3 posted on 06/29/2005 6:16:43 AM PDT by phoenix_004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Marko


There's no need to fight them...just nuke kimi ills bunker along with the nuclear sites!!! the war will end before it even starts!!!


4 posted on 06/29/2005 6:17:08 AM PDT by phoenix_004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Marko

"...it may cost us Seattle, Los Angeles, and Honolulu, however."


5 posted on 06/29/2005 6:19:19 AM PDT by Rutles4Ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever
"...it may cost us Seattle, Los Angeles, and Honolulu, however."

Why would the commies target other commies...?

6 posted on 06/29/2005 6:26:54 AM PDT by freebilly (Vast Right Wing Conservative Christian Heterosexual Conspirator....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Alex Marko

The US military can defeat anyone, anywhere - if only we are willing.


7 posted on 06/29/2005 6:42:42 AM PDT by phasma proeliator (It's not always being fast or even accurate that counts... it's being willing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Marko

the rest of that headline should read "in less then two weeks time".


8 posted on 06/29/2005 6:44:24 AM PDT by God luvs America (When the silent majority speaks the earth trembles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rutles4Ever

Los Angeles is now part of Mexico. No loss to us.


9 posted on 06/29/2005 8:14:39 AM PDT by conservativewasp (Liberals lie for sport and hate their country. Mohammad is a PIG)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: God luvs America
"the rest of that headline should read "in less then two weeks time"."

What, exactly, leads you to that conclusion? What do you have to say regarding North Korea's military attributes? How about their troop counts, reserve counts, missile technologies, and artillery emplacements? How many American troops will it take to win in two weeks? Where are those troops coming from? How are you going to fill their positions once they're reassigned? Where is their equipment coming from? Where are they getting the bombs? What are they going to use as a staging area? How are they going to cross the DMZ?

Blind nationalism costs American lives. A realistic approach to the situation is necessary unless we want to sustain the heaviest American casualties since Vietnam. That, of course, assumes North Korea doesn't get nuclear-armed Tae-po Dong IIs to the western shores of the US. In that case, we would see the largest American casualties of any war in the history of the country.
10 posted on 06/29/2005 8:28:56 AM PDT by NJ_gent (Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: freebilly
Why would the commies target other commies...?

Because they are still Americans, and it doesn't matter what kind of Americans, as long as they are Americans.

11 posted on 06/29/2005 10:52:55 AM PDT by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NJ_gent

it would be tough for them to wage an effective war if they say, can't get off their peninsula....amongst other things...


12 posted on 06/29/2005 11:18:34 AM PDT by God luvs America (When the silent majority speaks the earth trembles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson