To: Alex Marko
the rest of that headline should read "in less then two weeks time".
8 posted on
06/29/2005 6:44:24 AM PDT by
God luvs America
(When the silent majority speaks the earth trembles!)
To: God luvs America
"the rest of that headline should read "in less then two weeks time"."
What, exactly, leads you to that conclusion? What do you have to say regarding North Korea's military attributes? How about their troop counts, reserve counts, missile technologies, and artillery emplacements? How many American troops will it take to win in two weeks? Where are those troops coming from? How are you going to fill their positions once they're reassigned? Where is their equipment coming from? Where are they getting the bombs? What are they going to use as a staging area? How are they going to cross the DMZ?
Blind nationalism costs American lives. A realistic approach to the situation is necessary unless we want to sustain the heaviest American casualties since Vietnam. That, of course, assumes North Korea doesn't get nuclear-armed Tae-po Dong IIs to the western shores of the US. In that case, we would see the largest American casualties of any war in the history of the country.
10 posted on
06/29/2005 8:28:56 AM PDT by
NJ_gent
(Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson