Posted on 06/27/2005 8:37:42 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
Like i said, I DONT HAVE studies, IF you do a search on optimal speed MPG or something of that variation. 55MPH seems to be the consensus. I would like a NEW study to see if this is the case. Also I would like to see some sort of CAFE standard put on newer vehicles. It doesnt have to be very intrusive just 3-4 extra MPG... that wouldn't cause any harm. but would reduce our imports on oil a lot.
Yeah, right.
That is one of the stupidest responses I have seen in a while.
Neither you nor the sheet-heads are going to decide for me what my time is worth.
That is way over y'all's pay grade.
Politics is your answer . . . safety is not!
We have a fleet of about 50 cars. Trade them annually with an average of 80,000 miles each. Have for about 30 years. They are driven by our employees traveling all over the U.S. The average daily trip consists of 600 miles.
We have two locations where most maintenance is done except routine oil changes about 5,000 miles. Our fleet consists of several different types of vehicles. Each driver gets to choose from a list which a consulting firm works up based upon the performance of that years cars. We normally buy at the end of the model year to get the best prices.
Based upon our own computer printouts, we find that using cruise-control improves mileage and that we routinely get better performance at speeds in excess of 55 mph than at lower speeds.
In fact, mileage goes down when we get into congested areas. Our computers are now tied into a gps system so that we know where the vehicles are at all times. The worst mileage is obtained in metropolitan areas during rush hours.
How can a simple law requiring a "Reasonable and Prudent" speed be unconstitutional?
Were cars even in existence when the Montana Constitution was written?
And judges wonder why people are increasingly critical of them.
Why not carry it a step further and outlaw low mpg vehicles like my Jeep Wrangler.
Then perhaps control when and where people go.
Giving freedoms away one at a time is not what America is about.
Speed linits should be based on safety and nothing else. Windshield time for a business man is much more costly to the company and the country than a couple of miles per gallon.
Thats crazy. I have a 2003 Chevy Silverado with a 327. Could Chevy figure out a way to get 3-4MPG more out of it without sacrificing HP? I'm sure they could. Could Jeep get 3-4MPG more out of your Wrangler without sacrificing HP? I'm sure they could.
I agree that they could, but it should be my choice to pay the extra amount that it would cost at the time of purchase.
The government mandating safety / mileage features have priced new cars out of the reach of many people. What do they do? Buy older crappy cars that don't have these features anyway.
Go to the poor side of town and you will see that it is filled with mosquito foggers with forged inspection stickers.
My main point is that speed limits should be set based on safety concerns alone and leave the politics out.
Yep, but a-holes who don't do the speed limit in the left lane because they disagree with the limit should be arrested for reckless driving.
That is agenda driven.
My Maxima gets better mileage at 70 than it does at 55mph. The best mileage I ever got out of my Jeep is on a 70mph trip to the deer camp last year.
These are facts that are backed up by my record keeping, not by an agenda driven web site.
According to the Brady Group guns kill people on their own and 102% of gun owners shoot themselves. More agenda. More BS.
Further, time is the only commodity that I have and my supply is limited. The less I waste the better and damn the cost.
take that same 70mph trip at 55mph and i bet you get better gas mileage.
How much?
Let's make it ten thousand bucks.
Or to save yourself some money re-read my post to discern the meaning.
Here, I'll help.
The best mileage I ever got out of my Jeep is on a 70mph trip to the deer camp last year.
It has 70,000 miles on it. I know what kind of mileage it gets.
You still want to make that bet?
Try it and report back.
There, is THAT easier to understand????
This is like having a conversation with a parrot. It talks but nothing that it says has any meaning.
I am done here. Unless you want to make the 10k bet.
I started my maxillofacial residency in 1978. It seem that sometimes after that the speed limit was lowered to 55 nationally. We saw a huge drop off in severe facial and head and neck injuries. Of course as a resident we lamented the reduction of big panfacial fracture cases but now I don't miss them at all. If the speed limit goes back I will be getting a lot more ER calls and much more lengthy and complicated cases. I am getting to old for that stuff and I kind of like my nights and weekends. Seat belts and air bags also help so hopefully the new technology will prevent to "good" old days from returning.
One of my favorite quotes from a movie:
"Perhaps the laws of physics cease to exist on your stove. Were these magic grits? Did you buy them from the same guy who sold Jack his beanstalk beans?"
--Vincent Gambini - My Cousin Vinny--
"Its got a cop motor, a 440 cubic-inch plant. Its got cop tires, cop suspension, cop shocks. Its a model made before catalytic converters, so it'll run good on regular gas. What do you say, is it the new Bluesmobile or what?"
Let's see, 80+8= 88, OK!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.