Just because they were fradulent people doesn't mean the content of what the said isn't accurate.
"Their stories frequently reflect a theme taken from current headlines wildfires, for example, or prison brutality, school shootings, murderous road rage or a high-profile trial."
Ripped from the headlines. ;)
She should stick to fiction and stop trying to write NEWS!!
Busted!!
Possible help for Diana would be medicinal marijuana.
Besides, if such people don't really exist, they ought to.
This is not uncommon nowadays.
The 43 are probably registered democrats disenfranchised due to some right-wing conspiracy to only allow actual living persons the right to vote.
She was working for me under covers. After the story was published, we executived the people.
Another graduate from the Dan Rather/Jayson Blair school of journalism
Mike Barnicle had the same problem writing for the Boston Globe.
I hear she's about to complete a major work exploring newspaper journalists who are falsely accused of fabricating their stories.
Warning: Contents can be harmful to user. In studies they have been shown to cause a loss of perspective and damage one's moral compass.
I was getting my taxes done in Burbank today and actually picked up the LA times. It was the first time I picked up an actually newspaper in 3 to 5 years. I thumbed through it and noticed most of the stories I read on free republic within the last 72 hours. Newsprint is dead.
She gave an important voice to people who didn't exist. These words that were never spoken by anyone will reverberate down journalism's hall, as we all remember the forlorn nobody who uttered the famous words..."Dan? Is that you?"
Don't forget Stephen Glass, another up-and-coming, flawed liberal journalist, for the formally acclaimed NEW REPUBLIC... They just have no personal ethics or conscience.. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/05/07/60minutes/main552819.shtml
Don't forget Stephen Glass, another up-and-coming, flawed liberal journalist, for the formally acclaimed NEW REPUBLIC... They just have no personal ethics or conscience.. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/05/07/60minutes/main552819.shtml