Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The U.S.S.C. Oligarchy may have just cut off it's entire leg.
1 posted on 06/27/2005 6:48:05 AM PDT by Happy2BMe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Happy2BMe

Powerful! Thanks for posting.


2 posted on 06/27/2005 6:51:04 AM PDT by poobear (Imagine a world of liberal silence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: A. Pole; MeekOneGOP; devolve; potlatch; JohnHuang2; HiJinx; SJackson; dennisw; Diogenesis; Salem; ..

3 posted on 06/27/2005 6:52:19 AM PDT by Happy2BMe ("Viva La Migra" - LONG LIVE THE BORDER PATROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Happy2BMe

Forgive me for using such an overused term, but doesn't "authoritarian free enterprise" mean the same thing as "corporatist fascism"?


4 posted on 06/27/2005 6:53:11 AM PDT by thoughtomator (The U.S. Constitution poses no serious threat to our form of government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Happy2BMe

Free enterprise has nothing to do with it. Sure, there are corrupt businessmen ready to profit, but few people would venture to claim that Stevens, Souter, Ginsberg, Breyer, and Kennedy are spokesmen for free enterprise.

It's an alliance of corrupt politicians and corrupt businessmen. It's more in the line of Stalin or Hitler than Adam Smith.


6 posted on 06/27/2005 6:57:07 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Happy2BMe

It is my hope that this ruling will FINALLY cause the Democratic moderates and conservatives to wake up to the tyranny of the men and women in black.


7 posted on 06/27/2005 6:58:27 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Happy2BMe

Lawyers see this AS THE HARD TIME discussed in the article!! This is an elites for elietes decision.


The time the public would accept this the author suggests is ALREADY HERE in the eyes of the left wingers who dominate the legal profession.


I just came from a Bar Conference and the vast majority of laywers and lawyers who are judges are very very very ANGRY that republicans are in charge.


11 posted on 06/27/2005 7:01:05 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Happy2BMe

bttt


12 posted on 06/27/2005 7:01:40 AM PDT by firewalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Happy2BMe
Great article and post!

This decision is a watershed in American politics. It is one of those defining moments whereby people reveal their true allegiances and motivations....the masks (and gloves) will come off.

IMO, it falls into a special class of political issues which are coming to the forefront of awareness. Illegal immigration is such an issue, as is Christian religious expression. They are unique in that they cut across traditional political lines. Many folks over at DU were just as upset at this ruling as we were.

I don't have general catchall names to describe these new categories. On one side...you have a populist, traditional, individual oriented American culture...on the other a corporatist, elitist, progressive culture...but its a bit more complicated than that in my view.

It is both a cultural as well as a psychological distinction.
15 posted on 06/27/2005 7:09:38 AM PDT by Dat Mon (will work for clever tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Happy2BMe
Main Entry: fas·cism
Pronunciation: 'fa-"shi-z&m also 'fa-"si-
Function: noun
Etymology: Italian fascismo, from fascio bundle, fasces, group, from Latin fascis bundle & fasces fasces
1 often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition
2 : a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control
16 posted on 06/27/2005 7:09:51 AM PDT by Gritty ("The moment you give up your principles your civilization is dead. Period." - Oriana Fallaci)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Happy2BMe

Socialism allied with Big Business. Isn't that the definition of Fascism, per Mussolini, who invented it?


18 posted on 06/27/2005 7:26:55 AM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Happy2BMe
FORGET ABOUT THE SUPREME COURT ALREADY! They weren't being "oligarchical" by upholding a law that elected representatives enacted.

The blame for these laws lies with the politicians themselves. WE elected them, we can unelect them. If even a quarter of the anger that's been uselessly directed at the courts had instead been directed at the politicians, there would be heads rolling in city and town halls all across the country. But instead, everyone wastes their energy on SCOTUS, the branch of government that we have precisely the least influence on, and which didn't initiate the problem here. In the meantime, the slimy politicians get let off the hook. Can anyone give a rational reason for this?

29 posted on 06/27/2005 7:59:28 AM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Happy2BMe
Suggested future SCOTUS nominee guidelines:

NO more Souters
NO more Kennedys
and for God's sake, NO MORE GINSBURGS! (ACLU spawn)

32 posted on 06/27/2005 8:47:32 AM PDT by TheGrimReaper (It's time to bring back public flogging.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Happy2BMe; poobear

Free Enterprise? Since when are government siezures free enterprise? I'm getting sick of "moderates" confusing free enterprise and fascism. Free enterprise means people have the right to conduct business as they see fit, without government interference. In free enterprise, government serves merely to preserve the freedom by preventing lawlessness, invasion, and the restriction of markets. New London represents fascism here, the ability of the government to co-erce its subjects into business dealings they do not wish to engage in.


35 posted on 06/27/2005 10:16:08 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Happy2BMe

If this continues, the Rule of Five may finally meet Rule 308.


43 posted on 06/27/2005 2:20:05 PM PDT by Travis McGee (----- www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com -----)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson