Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Has the Supreme Court Shown the Hand of Authoritarian Free Enterprise?
JimSinclair ^

Posted on 06/27/2005 6:48:05 AM PDT by Happy2BMe

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
The U.S.S.C. Oligarchy may have just cut off it's entire leg.
1 posted on 06/27/2005 6:48:05 AM PDT by Happy2BMe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe

Powerful! Thanks for posting.


2 posted on 06/27/2005 6:51:04 AM PDT by poobear (Imagine a world of liberal silence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole; MeekOneGOP; devolve; potlatch; JohnHuang2; HiJinx; SJackson; dennisw; Diogenesis; Salem; ..

3 posted on 06/27/2005 6:52:19 AM PDT by Happy2BMe ("Viva La Migra" - LONG LIVE THE BORDER PATROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe

Forgive me for using such an overused term, but doesn't "authoritarian free enterprise" mean the same thing as "corporatist fascism"?


4 posted on 06/27/2005 6:53:11 AM PDT by thoughtomator (The U.S. Constitution poses no serious threat to our form of government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: poobear
This ruling is a show stopper. All bets are off.

Once people completely understand their Fifth Amendment rights have just been gutted and the sanctity of their home is up for grabs to the highest bidder, what reason do they have to continue paying property taxes?


5 posted on 06/27/2005 6:55:43 AM PDT by Happy2BMe ("Viva La Migra" - LONG LIVE THE BORDER PATROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe

Free enterprise has nothing to do with it. Sure, there are corrupt businessmen ready to profit, but few people would venture to claim that Stevens, Souter, Ginsberg, Breyer, and Kennedy are spokesmen for free enterprise.

It's an alliance of corrupt politicians and corrupt businessmen. It's more in the line of Stalin or Hitler than Adam Smith.


6 posted on 06/27/2005 6:57:07 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe

It is my hope that this ruling will FINALLY cause the Democratic moderates and conservatives to wake up to the tyranny of the men and women in black.


7 posted on 06/27/2005 6:58:27 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

You are right. The entire basis for this ruling has it's roots in the Communist Manifesto and the elimination of private property.


8 posted on 06/27/2005 6:59:47 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants; All
July 5th Protest Rally in New London,CT to support Kelo plaintiffs
9 posted on 06/27/2005 6:59:53 AM PDT by jwalsh07 ("Su casa es mi casa!" SCOTUS 6/23/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe

I never thought in my lifetime... This is a HUGE show stopper.


10 posted on 06/27/2005 7:00:38 AM PDT by poobear (Imagine a world of liberal silence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe

Lawyers see this AS THE HARD TIME discussed in the article!! This is an elites for elietes decision.


The time the public would accept this the author suggests is ALREADY HERE in the eyes of the left wingers who dominate the legal profession.


I just came from a Bar Conference and the vast majority of laywers and lawyers who are judges are very very very ANGRY that republicans are in charge.


11 posted on 06/27/2005 7:01:05 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe

bttt


12 posted on 06/27/2005 7:01:40 AM PDT by firewalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
While the elitists rule from their private chambers from on high - America is being unraveled from the highest court in the land and being economically and socially crippled by an illegal alien invasion.

If our borders are not sovereign, why should our homes be either?

Terms, labels, and innuendos.

These are the important one . .

ol•i•gar•chy
Pronunciation: 'ä-l&-"gär-kE, 'O-
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural -chies
Date: 1542
1 : government by the few
2 : a government in which a small group exercises control especially for corrupt and selfish purposes; also : a group exercising such control
3 : an organization under oligarchic control

sov•er•eign•ty
Variant(s): also sov•ran•ty /-tE/
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural -ties
Etymology: Middle English soverainte, from Middle French soveraineté, from Old French, from soverain
Date: 14th century
1 obsolete : supreme excellence or an example of it
2 a : supreme power especially over a body politic b : freedom from external control : AUTONOMY c : controlling influence
3 : one that is SOVEREIGN; especially : an autonomous state

13 posted on 06/27/2005 7:01:49 AM PDT by Happy2BMe ("Viva La Migra" - LONG LIVE THE BORDER PATROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator

This ruling is not consistent with any concept of free enterprise. Under free enterprise, the developer should have negotiated directly with the owners instead of running to the government "oh please nanny government throw out those pesky little people so we can build on it."

Intersesting this all occurs close to the 4th of July.


14 posted on 06/27/2005 7:08:57 AM PDT by Fred Hayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
Great article and post!

This decision is a watershed in American politics. It is one of those defining moments whereby people reveal their true allegiances and motivations....the masks (and gloves) will come off.

IMO, it falls into a special class of political issues which are coming to the forefront of awareness. Illegal immigration is such an issue, as is Christian religious expression. They are unique in that they cut across traditional political lines. Many folks over at DU were just as upset at this ruling as we were.

I don't have general catchall names to describe these new categories. On one side...you have a populist, traditional, individual oriented American culture...on the other a corporatist, elitist, progressive culture...but its a bit more complicated than that in my view.

It is both a cultural as well as a psychological distinction.
15 posted on 06/27/2005 7:09:38 AM PDT by Dat Mon (will work for clever tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
Main Entry: fas·cism
Pronunciation: 'fa-"shi-z&m also 'fa-"si-
Function: noun
Etymology: Italian fascismo, from fascio bundle, fasces, group, from Latin fascis bundle & fasces fasces
1 often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition
2 : a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control
16 posted on 06/27/2005 7:09:51 AM PDT by Gritty ("The moment you give up your principles your civilization is dead. Period." - Oriana Fallaci)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gritty
You've got the picture.
17 posted on 06/27/2005 7:21:53 AM PDT by Happy2BMe ("Viva La Migra" - LONG LIVE THE BORDER PATROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe

Socialism allied with Big Business. Isn't that the definition of Fascism, per Mussolini, who invented it?


18 posted on 06/27/2005 7:26:55 AM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dat Mon; Fred Hayek; Gritty; BeforeISleep; longtermmemmory; jwalsh07; poobear; thoughtomator; ...
As word of this ruling trickles down into the deepest fiber of the American culture - there can be no doubt it will cause major unrest.

Think about the literally millions of homeowners throughout America who will now fall prey to greed.

All a city has to do is ANNEX A DESIRED PROPERTY INTO THE CITY LIMITS to confiscate it.

19 posted on 06/27/2005 7:27:10 AM PDT by Happy2BMe ("Viva La Migra" - LONG LIVE THE BORDER PATROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe

If you quit paying your property taxes, you'll lose your property a lot faster than by Eminent Domain.


20 posted on 06/27/2005 7:28:18 AM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson