Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

City Moves Against Shopping Center Holdout
Suburban Journal- Southside Journal ^ | june 1, 2005 | Jim Merkel

Posted on 06/24/2005 11:04:13 AM PDT by Repealthe17thAmendment

A holdout in a developer's bid to acquire property for a shopping center is having her day in court.

A hearing on whether the city has the right to take the home of June Thompson by eminent domain was scheduled for Tuesday afternoon before St. Louis Circuit Court Judge Timothy Wilson.

(Excerpt) Read more at stltoday.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS: eminentdomain; kelo; lowes; privateproperty; schnucks; stlouis; tyrrany; urbanblight
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: Ladysmith

Economic blight is actually more correct than "urban blight". If an area is a discontinuity in the bid rent curve, it is blighted. By this definition, the entire city of St. Louis is blighted.


41 posted on 06/24/2005 12:31:11 PM PDT by steve8714
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Shazolene
Uh, anti-business diatribes are a staple of Leftists and of universities, and have been for decades. What's new about this one?

Did I state somewhere that I was sure this was NOT a leftist class? It's just not like many of the classes I had to take that were blatantly extreme in their leftism.

I liked the idea that a class would actually critically view the media, and someone actually mentions that the media, being a company, does have to try to make a profit ... and that effects the decisions the media makes for programming.

And I said:

This class sounds a lot better than the typical left-bent college course.

... because there didn't seem to be any "and it's the Republicans fault!" spin to it. Sure, maybe this would turn out to be a typical leftist "media's in bed will all corporations, it's the Republicans fault, they cover for Bush" type thing ... but it might also be a slightly overzealous statement of the simple idea: "Point a critical idea at where you information is coming from." I mean, do you disagree with all four statement that were made? Sure, you could ATTRIBUTE leftist meaning behind them, but:

1) corporate media is a corporation, and needs to make money to survive;

2) higher-ups and famous people in the media have the ability to drive what media covers;

3) #3 I DO somewhat disagree with, as I don't think the media was CREATED as a distraction, but the media does want to keep its viewers happy/interested enough to keep viewing;

4) "puppet strings" seems a bit strong (and may be where your leftism concern comes from), but ANY successful business wants to build and maintain a customer base, and pay its bigger earners more money.

So, unless they start ranting that corporations are evil, media should be state-run or individual-run only, or blasts a party for this situation, I'll consider it better than some of the courses I had to take.

And I'm all for corporations, but a corporation can tend to put profits over ethics or morals unless someone is minding the ship.

42 posted on 06/24/2005 12:36:58 PM PDT by bobhoskins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: steve8714

They should have blighted those Cupples buildings and dynamited them years ago. This poor lady's only hope is to have her home declared a landmark (first lesbian muslim bed and breakfast) or find an endangered slug on her property.


43 posted on 06/24/2005 12:42:38 PM PDT by steve8714
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: steve8714

he should find a couple of slugs and paint a red band around their necks. Hey presto, new species!


44 posted on 06/24/2005 1:00:02 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: steve8714

She should find a couple of slugs and paint a red band around their necks. Hey presto, new species!


45 posted on 06/24/2005 1:00:15 PM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: bobhoskins
I'm going to try to get back to you. I have a few thoughts about this rolling around inside my head, echoing off the walls as they bounce around. It needs to cogitate a while, as I've been thinking quite a bit about some of the recent court rulings, and tying it all together.

I wish I had Mark Steyn's gift with the written word. :-)

46 posted on 06/25/2005 12:18:37 AM PDT by zeugma (Democrats and muslims are varelse...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Ladysmith
I believe the old terminology that applies again is "subjects".

We're more like the tenant farmers of the feudal period. If your liege lord decides one day he'd make more money grazing sheep on the land he deigned to let you farm, your gone.

47 posted on 06/26/2005 8:48:05 AM PDT by RogueIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson