Posted on 06/24/2005 10:21:16 AM PDT by quidnunc
Every culture creates heroes in its own image: it’s difficult to imagine transferring the British adventurers — Rudolf Rassendyll and Richard Hannay, the Saint and 007 — to America. Likewise, ‘superheroes’ — guys in gaudy tights and capes flying through the streets — never quite work outside the United States. Marvel had a Captain Britain in the Seventies, and Jim Callaghan’s decrepit wasteland could certainly have used one. But he was the superhero equivalent of Elvis impersonators’ night in Romford. I seem to recall a Captain Canada, too, and a few other attempts at Canuck heroes — Mapleman? Beavergirl? — but contemporary Canada is not an heroic culture, never mind a superheroic one. There are other, older American archetypes — the stoic taciturn cowboy, etc. — but the early superheroes created in the Thirties and Forties embody the confidence of the national culture at the dawn of the US imperium. They look like America looks to much of Old Europe: brash, primary-coloured, faintly ridiculous, somewhat vulgar, but endowed with superpowers no one else can match. Technically, Superman is from Planet Krypton and Wonder Woman is an Amazon but, with names like that, one is not surprised to find them fighting side by side as members of the Justice League of America. They would be unlikely members of the Justice League of Belgium.
Their fellow JLA-er is now back, after an eight-year absence, in Batman Begins. Christopher Nolan’s title puts front and centre what most directors save for the promotional interviews: their expressed wish to strip away all the flotsam and jetsam that encrust any hit property after seven decades and get back to basics — in this case, Bob Kane’s original conception of the Batman, a man who as a young boy witnessed his parents’ murder and is driven to prowl the rooftops of Gotham as a dark knight of justice. (The ‘dark knight’ is Batman’s preferred designation these days, ‘caped crusader’ having fallen from favour presumably after pressure from Gotham City’s Islamic lobby groups.)
I’ve no problem with reinvention: the boffo superhero franchises are the equivalent of ‘My Funny Valentine’ — you can play it a thousand different ways and, while the crossover opera diva might not care for the bluegrass fiddler’s take or vice versa, the song will survive both versions. But, if you’re going to reinvent, you have to be inventive. Batman Begins begins in a prison camp somewhere in Asia, where a bedraggled and hirsute Bruce Wayne keeps picking fights with his fellow inmates. Fortunately, Liam Neeson is on hand to spring him from gaol and initiate him into the highly disciplined martial arts of an elite group commanded by someone called Ra’s Al Ghul.
Surely ‘reinvention’ doesn’t just mean dispensing with all the clichés of your own project and replacing them with all the clichés from everybody else’s movies — pseudo-mysticism, ninjas, stubble, bald Oriental masterminds, Liam Neeson being dour in a trenchcoat. The whole thing is utterly generic, and nothing to do with Batman. I assumed that this was some sort of gloomy prologue — like the last 007, where he’s unkempt and hairy in a North Korean prison listening to Madonna drone the world’s worst Bond song over and over, but after a grim ten minutes he swims ashore in Hong Kong, shaves, changes into his tux, has a martini and starts bonking and wisecracking his way around the world.
But not here. In 1939, Bob Kane told the Batman’s origin in 12 panels — mugger shoots mom and dad, young Bruce Wayne vows in his candlelit bedroom to avenge their deaths ‘by spending the rest of my life warring on all criminals’, works out at the gym, and then, just when he’s in need of a secret identity, catches sight of a bat. Boom — and we’re off and running. Nolan’s ‘reinvention’, by contrast, consists mainly of making a meal out of everything. We don’t see the Batman until the second half of the movie, and then only in the briefest of glimpses as he takes on the hoods and punks who work for crime boss Carmine Falcone (Tom Wilkinson). Meanwhile, we spend inordinate amounts of time watching him fine-tune the synthetic fibre on his body suit.
Back in 1989, everyone raved about how the 1989 Tim Burton Batman was wonderfully ‘dark’ after the campy Sixties TV version. But Nolan makes Burton look like Mel Brooks. The day before I saw the film I happened to hear Neal Hefti’s theme tune for the telly show: everyone remembers the dinner-dinner-dinner-dinner-dinner-dinner-dinner-dinner-Batman bit (which Hefti sorta auto-plagiarised from his arrangement of ‘Everybody’s Twistin’’ for Sinatra) but we forget the gloriously swingin’ middle-section of the tune, which is far cooler than Adam West deserved. Nolan’s Batman would benefit from kicking loose and jazzing it up a little. ‘Dark’ is a matter of contrast and, if you never lighten up, all you do is remind audiences that the dark, glum, relentlessly dingy-hued ‘reinvention’ has now become the stalest of clichés.
The film is wall-to-wall humourless, with the exception of four — count ’em — dry asides by Michael Caine as Alfred. But humourless isn’t the same as serious. And, for all the laboured seriousness with which the film takes itself, everything in it has been seen before, from the commuter train hurtling to disaster, to a sluggish car chase with no thrills, to the profit-driven arms-dealing wicked capitalists who’ve seized control of Wayne Industries, to the desperate restoration of the old love-means-having-never-to-say-you’re-Zorro routine whereby the masked avenger goes to ludicrous lengths to flounce around as a dissolute airhead moneybags in order to throw the girl he loves off the scent of his secret identity. This shtick would play better if there was any chemistry between Christian Bale’s Bruce Wayne and Assistant District Attorney Katie Holmes, earnest as a high-school civics project.
Batman Begins was mostly filmed in Britain with a classy cast of local(ish) talent — Caine, Wilkinson, Neeson, Gary Oldman, Rutger Hauer, plus Morgan Freeman. With the exception of Caine, none of them seems to be having any fun, and all seem determined to drag Batman down to earth. Compared to the flashier Superman, the dark knight was always more human and prone to brooding, but this film is way out of whack. The best superhero film of the last year remains The Incredibles, which, though animated and full of jokes about fat guys who can’t get into their tights and excessively fancy capes that get snagged by jet propellers, nevertheless manages to make more pertinent sharp observations about contemporary society in any 15-minute chunk than the whole of this self-consciously ‘important’ Batman.
Thanks for posting the entire piece quidnunc....
I wonder what powers Beavergirl would possess?Can we safely assume they involve wood, teeth, and big (flat) tails?
Well, I think we can safely assume that it involves tail...
True story: My mom is from Minnesota. Once, when she visited my grandmother she brought me home a T-shirt with a cartoon drawing of a beaver standing with his arms wide and the slogan "Be kind to animals. Kiss a beaver." Innocent fool that I was, I wore it to high school until a friend took pity on me and explained it.
She cuts down the woodys.
Does this idiot like any movies?
BATMAN BEGINS ROCKED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
It was one of the best comic book movies I've ever seen, perhaps one of the best action. I LOVED it!!!!!!!!!
I completely agree. Kevin Conroy (voices Bruce/Batman) and Mark Hamill (voices the Joker) are at their best in those movies.
By the way, are you keeping up with the new episodes of JLU on Cartoon Network on Saturday night, the completely ROCK in quality!!
Liam Neeson's terrorist cult sounds a lot like Osama.
Whose property gets destroyed? Only the hero has his house burned down. etc. etc.
Must disagree with Steyn this time. I thought this was the best on-screen Batman ever. I don't think they should do another after this though, since the last four movies progressively got worse. It should stop on a good note.
Oh, and thanks for putting out the full article. : )
Batman Begins rocked. It is true to the comic. It is a bit condensed for films sake but it is the Dark Knight up there for the first time ever. Only the animated Mask of the Phantasm came close before. It is serious, dark, realistic, and I say again. Conservative.
The parallels with the war on terror are there. Hollywood has made precious few films about the war on terror, I cant think of a any right now. Contrast that with WWII when so many war films came out in support of victory.
Writers learned to mask their messages during mcarthyism, using say aliens or other sci fi stories to hide meanings. Paranoia for instance on a few twilight zone episodes are a good example.
I think that this film may have been similar. Hollywood has a new Mcarthyism. No one must make films supportive of the war on terror. Batman Begins is about resolve against evil.
Even the new bat symbol somewhat resembles the American eagle symbol we all know with the wings oustretched. Does Batman respresent a post 9-11 America in the war on terror?
The Joker card at the end? ....reminds us of the Deck of 52 in Iraq.
The whole theme of confronting fear. Fear is the greatest tool that terrorist use.
Ra's al Ghul wishing to destroy and punish those that are not worthy in his eyes of saving?... Al Qaeda
Batman must keep his resolve, he must learn to maintain his morality even though he must come very close to crossing the line at times.
Bruce Wayne learns to pick himself up again after terrible losses, and never give up!
And going out on a limb here, the love interest in the film,(the only real non-comic character by the way) says when Batman is no longer needed, she can be with him again. Jeez, does she represent the countries like France? when teh war on terror is over, when we have saved the world again that the world community will get along again better? I know, just thinking out loud here, just food for thought. Only the writers know if any of this is intentional. Or could have been uncouncious on their part.
Same here. Sounds like Mark had his knickers in a knot over something and took it out on Batman. Just back from a Saturday matinee. I do not even remember the other Batman movies, but this one will stay with me and I will own it.
Very well rounded plot; top notch cast - the "action" I can take or leave that. But as far as good vs evil - no grey areas here. I'm not even sure that the Rachel character was necessary at all.
I haven't seen 'Begins' yet (wife and I are going tonight), but I would agree that 'Phantasm' is WAY BETTER than the Burton or Schumacher films...if memory serves, I believe Siskel and Ebert gave 'Phantasm' rave reviews, as well. Rent it.
Can we safely assume they involve wood, teeth, and big (flat) tails?
No, we can't. (g,d & r)
I never watched the Batman Begins TV series, but the ROTJ movie doesn't require it. Just be sure to get the uncut version. It isn't for little kids so WB forced a bunch of cuts to it but a copy of the uncut version made it on the net and fans demanded a DVD release. The first (edited) DVD is not nearly as good.
"I seem to recall a Captain Canada, too,"
That would be Captain Canuck. Alas, I was defeated by the Librano$, but I shall return....
What comics do you write?
Gotta disagree with Steyn for once. This film was what Batman films should have been from the start. Excellent film!
Indeed. It's worth noting that the silliness of the 60s TV show reflected the tone of the previous decade or so of comics (though, as it happened, the comics started shifting toward a more serious tone at the time the TV series was on the air).
That's based on the writings of some goofball by the name of Frederic Wertham who wrote a book called Seduction of the Innocent in the 50s. He found gay subtexts in a number of comic books, and one gets the distinct impression that he could find a gay subtext in a dial tone.
The cutting job on the latter has to be one of the stupidest concepts ever. Yeah, I wouldn't let a kid see the uncut version -- but I wouldn't let a kid see the censored version either, and there's just no way to cut that story into a kid-friendly version without reducing it to utter incoherence.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.