1 posted on
06/24/2005 7:17:30 AM PDT by
tenn2005
To: tenn2005
Did anyone in the GOP react publicly to this ruling?
2 posted on
06/24/2005 7:18:22 AM PDT by
Huck
(Don't follow leaders)
To: tenn2005
Some guys around the office were talking about this one yesterday. Does any one know there I get a copy of the ruling on the web? I want to write my "elected" officials.
GE
To: tenn2005
Liberal Justices voting for big business and big government, and conservative Justices voting for the little guy. Go figure. /sarcasm
7 posted on
06/24/2005 7:21:40 AM PDT by
Yo-Yo
To: tenn2005
This is outrageous!
The government can now confiscate your home and personal property for the economic good of others.
This is SCARY.
8 posted on
06/24/2005 7:22:20 AM PDT by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
To: tenn2005
United States of Zimbabwe. The Supremes must have been channeling Mugabe.
20 posted on
06/24/2005 7:38:52 AM PDT by
sportutegrl
(People who say, "All I know is . . ." really mean, "All I want you to focus on is . . .")
To: tenn2005
21 posted on
06/24/2005 7:41:04 AM PDT by
Ladysmith
((NRA) Wisconsin Hunter Shootings: If you want on/off the WI Hunters ping list, please let me know.)
To: tenn2005
Well thats 5 down. 5 to go. As soon as we get that flag burning amendment through, it will be 6.
So I wonder how happy the liberals are with their "liberal" injustices?
23 posted on
06/24/2005 7:44:14 AM PDT by
edeal
To: tenn2005
Those 5 Justices need to be impeached at the very least.
To: tenn2005
We're toast as a nation with this ruling. We just became no better than Communist China where the government can seize anything of your anytime it wants to.
The Constitution, as of this ruling, is not even decent toilet paper.
35 posted on
06/24/2005 8:09:39 AM PDT by
PeterFinn
(The Holocaust was perfectly legal.)
To: tenn2005
Interesting enough most on the left and right are abhorred by the ruling. Why they are abhorred is different, but the SCOTUS seems to have alienated a great majority of the populace on this one.
The ruling is indefensible, but what can be done in the short term to reverse it?
41 posted on
06/24/2005 8:23:37 AM PDT by
PigRigger
(Send donations to http://www.AdoptAPlatoon.org)
To: tenn2005
24 HOURS SINCE THE RULING.
AMERICA IS OUTRAGED.
WHERE IS PRESIDENT BUSH?
NOT A WORD.
To: tenn2005
The decision stinks, but I see a single ray of hope. The court left to the individual states the right to address the issue with legislation. That is the Republican form of government guaranteed in the Constitution.
To: tenn2005
Does anyone have a clue as to where the homes of the five communist "justices" are located?
I would suggest that if one knew these locations, it would be worth filing against their homes with the intent to develop commercial centers for generating tax revenue for the local counties and/or state.
Maybe that should have been done BEFORE the decision!
60 posted on
06/24/2005 10:23:07 AM PDT by
texson66
("Tyranny is yielding to the lust of the governing." - Lord Moulton)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
