Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Meetings to Focus on Bush Impeachment (WI)
Madison.com ^ | June 22, 2005 | Steve Elbow

Posted on 06/23/2005 2:15:07 PM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last
To: Diana in Wisconsin

just curious. I'm new here. Why are there no links to military recruiting sites like Goarmy.com or military.com on freerepublic.com. It seems the least that could be done to help out with the current recruiting problems.


41 posted on 06/24/2005 2:47:00 AM PDT by bohdi777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

--"What used to be called freak shows, charging money to peruse, are now called activists and they are their own worst trainwreck.
I have no problem with that."--

I agree. I hope they try to Impeach Bush right around election time 2006.

We won't need to motivate the base. They'll come out in record numbers.

It is especially funny when you consider that Republicans can post actual quote from almost all of these guys about how it is "revenge" for Clinton's trial.

A part of me longs to see thing....the sadist in me would love to see the Dems actually split the party in two for real and for good, which I think would happen as a net result of this process, because I think it would cost them what remains of their obstructionist power.

bring it on, losers!


42 posted on 06/25/2005 9:55:46 AM PDT by TitansAFC ("It would be a hard government that should tax its people 1/10th part of their income."-Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Diana in Wisconsin

Really.... what impeachable offense(s) did Misters Bush, Cheney et al commit?

1. "He lied to the American Public so that we could invade Iraq" --- if lying to the American public were an impeachable offense, just about every president would have been impeached. Even so, there is no evidence, to my knowledge that President Bush lied to the American public.

2. "The Downing Street Memo is proof positive that the intelligence was fabricated or manipulated" --- first of all, isn't the Downing Street Memo's veracity somewhat questionable? Secondly, the memo claims in one section that the evidence for WMDs is somewhat tenuous, then later on in the same memo, it discusses various war scenarios where Iraq uses WMDs... so which is it?

3. "War crimes"? What war crimes are we talking about? The fact that some soldiers at Abu Ghraib did something naughty? Those soldiers were punished, no link was established, casual or otherwise, that tied GWB to those abuses. "Crimes against humanity" ---- how is the liberation of millions of Iraqis a crime against humanity? I think that Saddam Hussein and his confederates are guilty of this.

4. Breaches of US and international law. Didn't the Senate approve hostilities against Iraq? And how did we break International Law by invading Iraq? Oh, I get it, Kofi Annan called the Iraqi invasion "illegal" --- that's it, isn't it?

OK.... my turn, how about this for criminal offenses?

1. Defamation of character. If anyone is guilty of defamation of character, it is the Left in their ever ongoing campaign to impugn the president, the Vice President and so forth. Now the question is, can the president actually sue someone for making nasty remarks about him, even when they've been proven to be false.

2. Providing aid, comfort and relief to the Enemy during a time of hostilities involving American troops. If a day went by where the Main Stream Media wasn't conjuring up innuendo about our troops, the military, turning public opinion against the war effort and plain out just giving the Enemy fodder for propaganda against America, I don't believe I'd know them.

3. Actively pursuing a course of action which puts American lives at risk.... By calling for a bunch of un-needed investigations of the military during a time of hostility, the focus on fighting the enemy and defeating him is lessened. Also, undermining the national resolve to win this war. In both cases, it can be argued that such actions endanger American lives.


43 posted on 06/29/2005 11:54:06 AM PDT by GrouchoMarx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson