Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

High Court: Govts Can Take Property for Econ Development
Bloomberg News

Posted on 06/23/2005 7:30:08 AM PDT by Helmholtz

U.S. Supreme Court says cities have broad powers to take property.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: barratry; bastards; biggovernment; blackrobedthieves; breyer; commies; communism; communismherewecome; confiscators; corrupt; doescharactercount; duersagreewithus; eminentdomain; fascism; feastofbelshazzar; foreignanddomestic; frommycolddeadhands; ginsburg; grabbers; henchmen; hillarysgoons; isittimeyet; johnpaulstevens; jurisbullshit; kelo; liberalssuck; livingdocument; moneytalks; mutabletruth; nabothsvineyard; nabothvsjezebel; nuts; oligarchy; plusgoodduckspeakers; plutocracy; positivism; prolefeed; propertyrights; revolutionwontbeontv; robedtryants; rubberethics; ruling; scotus; showmethemoney; socialism; socialistbastards; souter; stooges; supremecourt; thieves; turbulentpriests; tyranny; tyrrany; usscsucks; votefromtherooftops; wearescrewed; weneededbork; whoboughtthisone; youdontownjack
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 1,521-1,527 next last
To: SoFloFreeper

Greetings to a fellow Floridian.


241 posted on 06/23/2005 8:43:35 AM PDT by lastchance (Hug your babies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: TheSpottedOwl
I have a better one: any old oak trees on the properties? Rare plant species? Historical landmarks? Spotted owl nests????

Yup.

It's time to play dirty.

242 posted on 06/23/2005 8:43:53 AM PDT by Freebird Forever (Imagine if islam controlled the internet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: montag813

Go read about the IKEA store in New Jersey a few years ago. If I remember correctly, that was a well established residential area. Like I said, I do not believe I am blowing this out of proportion. Not one bit.


243 posted on 06/23/2005 8:43:55 AM PDT by Tatze (I voted for John Kerry before I voted against him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Helmholtz

Try Eminent Domain.... certainly it can by imminent, if it is used against you.


244 posted on 06/23/2005 8:44:09 AM PDT by pointsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Helmholtz
Most the citizens, and legislators have been brainwashed into this for years. Now they have made official.

This is soooo serious, and makes me so sick.
245 posted on 06/23/2005 8:44:17 AM PDT by Delphinium
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OB1kNOb

You can pick up Savage's live broadcast (3-6 p.m., PDT) on his home station in S.F.: http://www.910knew.com/main.html


246 posted on 06/23/2005 8:44:35 AM PDT by glennaro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB

Blatantly unconstitutional.
I just HAVE to see the justices' "reasoning" behind this.


247 posted on 06/23/2005 8:44:38 AM PDT by Constitution Day (Emphatically eschew exclamatory excess.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: Tatze

One word. Impeach.


248 posted on 06/23/2005 8:45:08 AM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #249 Removed by Moderator

To: RightWhale
The only doubt regards the boundaries of the right, which is what I said before. What would you concede as an explicit acknowledgment of private property rights? I imagine it'd be something like this:

"The right to private ownership of property shall not be abridged."

That is exactly what the Framers have stated by their formulation. With other words, they have said the following: 'The right to private property shall not be abridged except...'

There is no other rational way to read the Fourth and Fifth Amendments.

250 posted on 06/23/2005 8:45:15 AM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
The only doubt regards the boundaries of the right, which is what I said before. What would you concede as an explicit acknowledgment of private property rights? I imagine it'd be something like this:

"The right to private ownership of property shall not be abridged."

That is exactly what the Framers have stated by their formulation. With other words, they have said the following: 'The right to private property shall not be abridged except...'

There is no other rational way to read the Fourth and Fifth Amendments.

251 posted on 06/23/2005 8:45:29 AM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: mrs9x

You are right in that this will not effect people in many states. But some states, with blighted cities, will not want to tie their own hands so tightly. With any luck, they will prevent local governments from doing so.


252 posted on 06/23/2005 8:45:33 AM PDT by AmishDude (Once you go black hat, you never go back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
And the Fifth Amendment might as well never have been written

So that just leaves the remnants of the second right?

253 posted on 06/23/2005 8:46:17 AM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Red Boots
That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it,

AMEN!

and

Of the Simplicity of Criminal Laws in Different Governments
In republican governments, men are all equal; equal they are also in despotic governments:
in the former, because they are everything; in the latter, because they are nothing.

THE SPIRIT OF LAWS Book VI
By Charles de Secondat, Baron de Montesquieu

(One of the most quoted writings used by the Founders while forming our government.)

254 posted on 06/23/2005 8:46:18 AM PDT by MamaTexan (IMPEACH the black - robed BASTARDS!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Helmholtz
I think we've finally reached the point where even a French "man" has stronger property rights than an American.
255 posted on 06/23/2005 8:46:38 AM PDT by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

PS. Please do me a favor and don't bring up the Terri Schiavo case to me. Most people around here lose all sense of reason and logic when discussing that and I just don't want to go there anymore.


256 posted on 06/23/2005 8:47:05 AM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: Nightshift

ping


257 posted on 06/23/2005 8:47:20 AM PDT by tutstar ( <{{--->< Impeach Judge Greer http://www.petitiononline.com/ijg520/petition.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dat Mon
The scariest part if the legalization of socioeconomic cleansing explicit and central to this case. 117 homes have been taken to be replaced with 80 new homes. Because the values of the old homes were less, the government can now declare them derelict, and start eminent domain against them. For the property tax revenue increases for the government. It's the new American racism, and the Supreme Court have "legalized" the bigotry. In decades to come, this ruling will be seen equivalent to Plessy vs. Ferguson, and there's no better time than today to

Start calling it the Plessy vs. Ferguson of 21st century mulitcultural America.

258 posted on 06/23/2005 8:47:30 AM PDT by JerseyHighlander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: glennaro

Much obliged.


259 posted on 06/23/2005 8:48:42 AM PDT by OB1kNOb (Excrementum Occurum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: BlackElk

Bookmark Bump


260 posted on 06/23/2005 8:48:53 AM PDT by ninenot (Minister of Membership, Tomas Torquemada Gentlemen's Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 1,521-1,527 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson