Yes. Jimmy Carter, our former president is wrong and most right thinking people know it.
If you'd like to defend him please start right now.
Posted on 06/22/2005 4:28:00 PM PDT by perfect stranger
If you still have any doubts about whether closing Guantanamo is the right thing to do, Jimmy Carter recently cleared that up by demanding that it be closed. With any luck, he'll try to effect another one of those daring "rescue" attempts. Here's a foolproof method for keeping America safe: Always do the exact 180-degree opposite of whatever Jimmy Carter says as quickly as possible. (Instead of Guantanamo, how about we close down the Carter Center?)
Sen. Dick Durbin says it is reminiscent of the "Nazis, Soviets in their gulags or some mad regime – Pol Pot or others." (He then offered the typical Democrat "if/then" non-apology: i.e., "if my remarks offended anyone," based on the rather remote possibility any sentient, English-speaking adult who didn't hate America could have heard them and not been offended.) Amnesty International calls Guantanamo a "gulag." Sen. Teddy Kennedy says he cannot condone allegations of near-drowning "as a human being." And Sen. Patrick Leahy calls it "an international embarrassment," as opposed to himself, a "national embarrassment."
On the bright side, at least liberals have finally found a group of people in Cuba whom they think deserve to be rescued.
In the interests of helping my country, I have devised a compact set of torture guidelines for Guantanamo.
It's not torture if:
The same acts performed on a live stage have been favorably reviewed by Frank Rich of the New York Times;
Andrew Sullivan has ever solicited it from total strangers on the Internet;
You can pay someone in New York to do it to you;
Karen Finley ever got a federal grant to do it;
It's comparable to the treatment U.S. troops received in basic training;
It's no worse than the way airlines treat little girls in pigtails flying to see Grandma.
It turns out that the most unpleasant aspect of life at Guantanamo for the detainees came with the move out of the temporary "Camp X-Ray." Apparently, wanton homosexual sex among the inmates is more difficult in their newer, more commodious quarters. (Suspiciously, detainees retailing outlandish tales of abuse to the American Civil Liberties Union often include the claim that they were subjected to prolonged rectal exams.) Plus, I hear the views of the Caribbean aren't quite as good from their new suites.
Even the tales of "torture" being pawned off by the detainees on credulous American journalists are pretty lame.
The Washington Post reported that a detainee at Guantanamo says he was "threatened with sexual abuse." (Bonus "Not Torture" rule: If it is similar to the way interns were treated in the Clinton White House.)
"Sign or you will be tortured!"
"What's the torture?"
"We will merely threaten you with horrible things!"
"That's it?"
"Shut up and do as we say, or we'll issue empty, laughable threats guaranteed to amuse you. This is your last warning."
One detainee in Afghanistan told a hyperventilating reporter for Salon that he was forced to stand with his arms in the air for "hours." Doctor, I still have nightmares about the time I was forced to stand with my arms up in the air ...
Others claimed they were forced into uncomfortable, unnatural positions, sort of like the Democrats' position on abortion. Next, the interrogators will be threatening to slightly undercook the Lemon Chicken!
According to Time magazine, this is how the "gulag of our time" treats the inmates: "The best-behaved detainees are held in Camp 4, a medium-security, communal-living environment with as many as 10 beds in a room; prisoners can play soccer or volleyball outside up to nine hours a day, eat meals together and read Agatha Christie mysteries in Arabic."
So they're not exactly raping the detainees with dogs at Guantanamo. (I still think the gift shop T-shirts that said "My dad went to Guantanamo and all I got was this lousy T-shirt" goes too far.)
The only question is: Why do Democrats take such relish in slandering their country? If someone was constantly telling vicious lies about you, would you believe they supported and loved you?
"I love John Doe, and that's why I accuse him of committing serial rape and mass murder. Oh, he doesn't do that? Yes, but how dare you say I don't love John Doe!"
And now back to our regular programming on Air America ...
Ah, another beliver in the "JIMMY CARTER IS ALWAYS WRONG" theory of foreign policy.
It's actually an immutable law of nature, like Newton's laws of motion, and can be expressed mathematically as:
Right Thing To Do = -(What Jimmy Carter Says)
You covered all the good ones!
And more religious freedom.
Classic. Perfect. Awesome.
Freggin` great! Classic Coulter. Please God, please, before I leave this earth, please let me see an Ann Coulter - Hillary Clinton debate happen on national TV!
Hilarious. Reminiscent of Hans Blix' threats to Kim Jong Il in Team America World Police.
And I will remain a believer until someone can explain exactly how Carter was a benefit to US policy, foreign or domestic.
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
Durbin's comments were seditious; Carter's were merely his typical stupidity.
Yes. Jimmy Carter, our former president is wrong and most right thinking people know it.
If you'd like to defend him please start right now.
53 and 54--priceles, awesome!!
I can! When he conceded to Reagan in November 1980. Even then he screwed the pooch. He conceded way before the West Coast polls were closed.
From what I heard about Rickover, he was not the easiest guy to work for or with. And he actually hated the Navy.
1980 was a landslide victory for our 3rd greatest of Presidents.
Those that manage to get away from Cuba in their attempt to get to the shores of the US - if they are still at sea, they are sent back....
Perhaps the prisoners should be allowed to "escape" from Guantanamo, to make their way either to the Castro-controlled portion of Cuba, or perhaps to Aruba, where tourists now are taken off and "disposed" of, in some undisclosed manner.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.