Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hugh Hewitt: Rehnquist to retire on Monday
The Hugh Hewitt Show ^ | June 21, 2005

Posted on 06/21/2005 4:48:41 PM PDT by Tree of Liberty

Hugh Hewitt just said, moments ago, that, according to his sources, Chief Justice William Renquist will announce his retirement on Monday, and that the President will announce his nominee on Tuesday.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: chiefjustice; godamongmen; hewitt; renquist; retirement; scotus; supremecourt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440441-460461-480 ... 521 next last
To: mware
Your words to God's ears.

My first time meeting Justice Scalia was at the Italian Store in Arlington, VA where the very Italian staff treated him like a rock star.

441 posted on 06/21/2005 8:14:03 PM PDT by Sthitch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TexasTransplant

In the long run, Dubya's strategy is great. Look at Durbin. He's flailing. The Democrats are flailing. If Bush is aggressive, they have something to focus on. Bush will always keep the rhetoric soft. It may not be a perfect strategy, but he wins in the long run.


442 posted on 06/21/2005 8:15:00 PM PDT by AmishDude (Once you go black hat, you never go back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 435 | View Replies]

To: Torie

Mine too. Although, if they believe the embarassing ones, they also need to believe the ones that have me saying how great I am.


443 posted on 06/21/2005 8:15:52 PM PDT by AmishDude (Once you go black hat, you never go back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 438 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide; Torie
...Gonzales is as sharp as an aluminum bat.

Umm.. That don't sound right. I'm thinking sharp as a bag full of wet mice..

444 posted on 06/21/2005 8:22:51 PM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 430 | View Replies]

To: Torie; GOPGuide; jwalsh07
MR. GONZALES: Thank you for that question, Senator. Let me just say at the outset regarding Judge Owen: I served with Judge Owen on the Texas Supreme Court, and I think she did a splendid job, a superb job as a judge. I think she would make a superb judge on the 5th Circuit, and that's why her name was recommended to the president. There were a series of very contentious cases -- opinions written in connection with six cases, I think, involving four minor daughters in the year 2000 while I was on the court. It is true that the law -- the legislature made it a policy judgment that they wanted more -- they wanted parents more involved with the abortion decisions of their minor daughters. But the legislature did not make the parental rights absolute; they provided three exceptions. And most of the decisions of the court involved -- are about interpreting those exceptions, allowing a judicial bypass.

My comment about an act of judicial activism was not focused at Judge Owen or Judge Hecht; it was actually focused at me. What I was saying in that opinion was that, given my interpretation of what the legislature intended, by the way the words that they used in terms of having a minor not totally informed or well informed but sufficiently well informed and the structure of the act, it was in my judgment that the legislature did intend the judicial bypasses to be real. And given my conclusion about what the legislature intended, it would have been an act of judicial activism not to have granted the bypass in that particular case. If someone like Judge Owen in that case reached a different conclusion about what the legislature intended, it would have been perfectly reasonable for her to reach a different outcome. But as to the words that have been used as a sword against Judge Owen, let me just say that those words were related to me in terms of my interpretation of what the legislature intended, again, through the words of the statute and the way that the judicial bypass procedure would actually operate in practice.

Source.

IOW, to NOT grant a judicial bypass, given the way the law was written, would have been an act of judicial activism.

Gonzales is, if anything, a strict constructionist. Not an activist.

445 posted on 06/21/2005 8:24:29 PM PDT by sinkspur (If you want unconditional love with skin, and hair and a warm nose, get a shelter dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 436 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

You do realize, don't you, that liberals regard conservative judges as the "activists"?


446 posted on 06/21/2005 8:27:09 PM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 445 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

"Gonzales is, if anything, a strict constructionist."

Oh yeah, that's why he supported Race Quotas in legal briefs before SCOTUS, yeah sink, you REALLY know your stuff...


447 posted on 06/21/2005 8:28:17 PM PDT by GOPGuide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 445 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv
Yes. But posters on this thread ought to know better.

Gonzales reasoning on the Texas parental consent decisions have been posted dozens of times here, yet ignorami still insist he's not pro-life.

The Texas legislature changed the wording of the law to raise the standard for judicial bypass in 2001.

448 posted on 06/21/2005 8:30:17 PM PDT by sinkspur (If you want unconditional love with skin, and hair and a warm nose, get a shelter dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 446 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide
Oh yeah, that's why he supported Race Quotas in legal briefs before SCOTUS, yeah sink, you REALLY know your stuff...

He was not a judge in that case. In fact, Ted Olson was the judicial advocate in that case, not Alberto Gonzales.

449 posted on 06/21/2005 8:31:32 PM PDT by sinkspur (If you want unconditional love with skin, and hair and a warm nose, get a shelter dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 447 | View Replies]

To: Torie

"How do you know that?"

I work with DC lobbyists, and know a few people who've worked for Gonzales. I'm not friends with Rove or anything, but I do hear things from time to time.

I have no more idea of who is going to be appointed than you do.

"You seem to know more about Gonzalez than most of us; he is at once both pro Roe and dumb."

Dumb in the sense that he is NOT an intellectual, in a job where the public expects you to be a first rate academic intelligence whether you are a liberal or a conservative by philosophical bent.


450 posted on 06/21/2005 8:32:05 PM PDT by GOPGuide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 436 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

"He was not a judge in that case. In fact, Ted Olson was the judicial advocate in that case, not Alberto Gonzales."

I didn't say he was judge dumbass, I said he got the Administration to support Race Quotas.

Olson had his briefs watered down BY GONZALES in order to support Race Quotas.


451 posted on 06/21/2005 8:33:57 PM PDT by GOPGuide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 449 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

To be honest with you, I haven't examined Gonzalez all that much except that I've looked over a few of his rulings and don't think he's much of an intellect..

In any case, it would be totally inept of GWB to appoint someone Attorney General knowing that just a few months afterward he'd be appointing him to Justice of the Supreme Court, and so I think this entire discussion is moot.


452 posted on 06/21/2005 8:34:29 PM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 448 | View Replies]

To: Tree of Liberty
Knowing how President Bush appoints more dems to important jobs, he will probably appoint President Fox to replace the chief justice. Isn't Fox a "really" good friend of Bushs'??
453 posted on 06/21/2005 8:36:07 PM PDT by antiunion person (For the Preservation of the United States, WE Need to Close Down the Borders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tree of Liberty
Nah, I think the real fun will be when one of the die hard libs retires, since that will shift the balance of power from 5-4 to 6-3.

Yup. The Dims will give us a hard time about this but I bet will ultimately let the Prez's pick go through.

The first lib to go will be the hard one.

454 posted on 06/21/2005 8:38:30 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (In God We Trust. All Others We Monitor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide

So you've given up on Gonzales as pro-choice?

Good. That's progress.


455 posted on 06/21/2005 8:40:05 PM PDT by sinkspur (If you want unconditional love with skin, and hair and a warm nose, get a shelter dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 451 | View Replies]

To: Torie

I'm pretty sure I fall into that akin-to-bipolar category myself. ;^)


456 posted on 06/21/2005 8:41:15 PM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 424 | View Replies]

To: AntiGuv

Genius is not a cost free condition. That's why smart Jews have a propensity to certain nuerological diseases, so I read in the WSJ. God for some reason dictated that WASP geniuses (or fallen Catholic geniuses, or both) are destined to be more prone to other problems. God believed in diversity in diseases. And there you have it.


457 posted on 06/21/2005 8:49:23 PM PDT by Torie (Constrain rogue state courts; repeal your state constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 456 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette

My nominee:

O`Scannlain, Diarmuid Fionntain
Born 1937 in New York, NY

Federal Judicial Service:
U. S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Nominated by Ronald Reagan on August 11, 1986, to a seat vacated by Robert Boochever; Confirmed by the Senate on September 25, 1986, and received commission on September 26, 1986.

Education:
St. John`s University, B.A., 1957

Harvard University, J.D., 1963

University of Virginia School of Law, LL.M., 1992

Professional Career:
U.S. Army Reserve, JAG Corps, 1955-1978
Tax attorney, Standard Oil Company of New Jersey and New York City, 1963-1965
Private practice, Portland, Oregon, 1965-1969
Deputy state attorney general, Oregon State Department of Justice, 1969-1971
Public utility commissioner, Oregon 1971-1973
Director, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, 1973-1974
Private practice, Portland, Oregon, 1975-1986
Consultant, Office of the President-Elect of the United States, 1980-1981
Team leader, President's Private Sector Survey on Cost Control/Grace Commission, 1982-1983
Chairman, Advisory Panel to the U.S. Secretary of Energy, 1983-1985

Race or Ethnicity: White

Gender: Male


458 posted on 06/21/2005 8:52:21 PM PDT by Palladin (God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur

Here's a thought: convince me Gonzales is a fair swap for Rehnquist.


459 posted on 06/21/2005 8:53:33 PM PDT by nunya bidness (Remember, they hated Him first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 455 | View Replies]

To: nunya bidness
He's not a swap for Rehnquist. He won't be a swap for Rehnquist.

But he might be a swap for Stevens or O'Connor.

460 posted on 06/21/2005 8:54:43 PM PDT by sinkspur (If you want unconditional love with skin, and hair and a warm nose, get a shelter dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 459 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440441-460461-480 ... 521 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson