Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘Unwilling to work’ letter pulled (letter of "mass resignation" by teachers' union)
Times Leader ^ | 6/21/2005 | KASIA KOPEC

Posted on 06/21/2005 6:17:47 AM PDT by Born Conservative

Board to vote on whether to accept rescinded letter today, solicitor says Crestwood teacher negotiations Board to vote on whether to accept rescinded letter today, solicitor says

Union president says letter was misconstrued to imply mass resignation.

WRIGHT TWP. (PA) – The president of the Crestwood Education Association hand delivered a written statement to Superintendent Richard Duffy’s home late Monday night rescinding a June 14 letter in which he said teachers would be “unwilling to work” if a new contract isn’t inked prior to the start of the 2005-2006 school year.

The most recent letter, like the first, was penned by Joseph Chmiola Jr., who serves as the teachers union president. It reads in part, “I am writing to advise you that to the extent the June 14, 2005 letter was construed as a resignation is hereby rescinded.”

School board Solicitor Jack Dean said the board plans to vote today to accept the “rescinded resignation,” and if it is accepted, will not go forward with plans to advertise for new faculty.

“The union recognized, obviously, that their (original) letter has rightfully been construed as a mass resignation and that the board was willing to accept it for how it was written,” Dean said. “This board went eye to eye with the union and the union blinked.”

Reached at home Monday night, Chmiola downplayed his most recent letter, saying it was nothing more than another effort to clarify the message he intended to relay in his June 14 correspondence.

“It’s real simple, basically this letter says the original letter was not a mass resignation, which is what I’ve been saying all along,” Chmiola said. “They keep saying it was a mass resignation and I keep saying it wasn’t. This is just another effort on my part to get that across.”

Chmiola said he was not pressured by union membership to rescind the June 14 letter.

“I wasn’t hearing that at all, in fact those members I talked to about this (second) letter said, ‘Why are you doing that?’ ” said Chmiola.

Chmiola added he simply wanted to cover all bases.

Dean said board members hope Monday’s correspondence represents a breakthrough in what has been an often bitter, 3-year-long battle to reach a new contract with the district’s 160 teachers.

“We hope this is a step toward some progress,” said Dean. “We have a negotiation session set for July 7 and the board, as it has always done, will go into that session in good faith with the fervent hope of reaching an agreement.”

Health care is the biggest issue dividing the two sides, with teachers resisting the board’s effort to institute a healthcare cost-sharing plan.

Chmiola said the union is serious about wanting to negotiate a deal and that his recent letters were intended to convey that message.

TO: Mr. Richard T. Duffy, Superintendent

FROM: Mr. Joseph J. Chmiola, Jr., CEA President

DATE: June 20, 2005

RE: Letter of June 14, 2005

Dear Mr. Duffy:

Pursuant to our June 20, 2005 conversation, I am writing to advise you that to the extent the June 14, 2005 letter that was construed as a resignation is hereby rescinded.

As we discussed, the purpose of the June 14th letter was to ensure that the District and Association meet over the summer on a regular and timely basis to resolve our longstanding contractual dispute. As you are aware, this has become a most serious matter, as we are now 3 1/2 years without a successor agreement.

Again, the June 14th letter was not a letter of resignation from the members of the Crestwood Education Association or myself or any other individual. No one has resigned and no one from the Crestwood Education Association is resigning from their employment with the Crestwood School District.

As we stated in the June 14th letter, we are stressing the importance of the District and Association meeting and negotiating on a regular and timely basis to reach a mutually acceptable agreement.

Finally, I want to thank you for your call, and for resolving the misunderstanding.

Sincerely,

Joseph J. Chmiola, Jr.

CEA President


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: crestwood; nea; psea; pspl
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: cuz_it_aint_their_money

I say accept the resignation, but allow for the option of hiring back the good teachers at the board's discretion...


21 posted on 06/21/2005 6:59:14 AM PDT by Frumious Bandersnatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative
Pursuant to our June 20, 2005 conversation, I am writing to advise you that to the extent the June 14, 2005 letter that was construed as a resignation is hereby rescinded.

The way I read this gibberish is it "rescinds" the way the school board interpreted the union's earlier letter.

What BS.

It is a classic non-apology apology.

The board should tell them to stuff it.

22 posted on 06/21/2005 7:01:44 AM PDT by HIDEK6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Athwart
Hope this guy's not an English teacher.

No kidding.

23 posted on 06/21/2005 7:02:11 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Nice 'til I'm not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative
"I am writing to advise you that to the extent the June 14, 2005 letter that was construed as a resignation is hereby rescinded."

Apart from the pathetic spectacle of a leader trying to rescind an ultimatum, has anyone noticed that the quoted sentence is ungrammatical?
24 posted on 06/21/2005 7:02:20 AM PDT by xenophiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TXBSAFH

Bust the union.


25 posted on 06/21/2005 7:03:02 AM PDT by TheForceOfOne (My tagline is currently being blocked by Congressional filibuster for being to harsh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

Texas is a right to work State, so not all teachers are unionized, however, Pennsylvania is all union and they are paid well - our district averaged in the upper 80's for salaries - I wouldn't think a teacher would be willing to take a chance on that kind of salary, but apparently they feel more powerful than they are


26 posted on 06/21/2005 7:03:09 AM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA (Prayers for healing and relief from pain for Cowboy...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

It still came from the same mainstream media that slanders our military and blames President Bush for everything.
I don't blame all of society's problems on any one thing, nor do I focus on the negative (I acknowledge both). Liberals do enough of that already.

I would rather see how I can help solve things rather than bicker and complain.

No, I don't think of myself as some kind of high-up person. Quite the opposite. I just keep trying every day to help make a difference in my little corner of the world.


27 posted on 06/21/2005 7:06:46 AM PDT by moog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

educate their own children in their own ideals

Yes, the Muslims apply that all too much:) Sorry, couldn't resist.


28 posted on 06/21/2005 7:08:06 AM PDT by moog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: xenophiles

Good catch - it almost hurts to read it.


29 posted on 06/21/2005 7:11:40 AM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA (Prayers for healing and relief from pain for Cowboy...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: moog
Yes, the Muslims apply that all too much:) Sorry, couldn't resist.

Are you comparing those who don't like Leftist 'educators' indoctrinating their kids in liberalism to Muslims?

If so, you have a problem.

30 posted on 06/21/2005 7:38:15 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Nice 'til I'm not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: TheForceOfOne

Whoever decide that public employees should be able to unionize was out of their ever-lovin' minds. It has become a monster. No matter how much money is fed into "public education", it is NEVER enough. 24% of Minnesota's state budget goes to education, and every year the MNEA whines they need more. If the ENTIRE state budget were allocated, it still wouldn't be enough to satisfy these leeches.
I'd love to see public unions busted. We'd find out real quick who was worth their salaries and who isn't. But good luck ever finding a way to do it. The politicians don't have the stones for the fight, and thus the public (us) will continue to be a big fat cash cow for the unions.


31 posted on 06/21/2005 8:06:41 AM PDT by 95 Bravo ("Freedom is not free.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: 95 Bravo
Unions did serve a purpose once upon a time early in the industrial revolution but today they have become more of a liability for workers and employers. There are enough state and federal laws on the books now to cover the basic requirements to a safe and fair working environment for everyone.

The Teachers Union places union workers and administrative costs before the children and the quality of the service extended to the education of the children. Every time union contracts get renegotiated or the current contracts call for stepping up salaries and benefits more money is required without any consideration to the children getting better education. It is all me me me and screw the children.
32 posted on 06/21/2005 8:33:49 AM PDT by TheForceOfOne (My tagline is currently being blocked by Congressional filibuster for being to harsh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: TheForceOfOne

Absolutely true.


33 posted on 06/21/2005 9:45:24 AM PDT by 95 Bravo ("Freedom is not free.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: 95 Bravo

Thanks,
Hey, I didn't see this article on a thread search. It was printed in the NY Post today. You should read it. I wanted to post it but I have to go to a funeral now.
http://www.nypost.com/commentary/commentary.htm

"BUSH DEFENDS 'HUMANE' GITMO"
By DEBORAH ORIN
WASHINGTON — President Bush yesterday passionately defended the Iraq war and the treatment of terror suspects at Guantanamo, saying America won't call it quits until the "coldblooded killers" terrorizing Iraq are defeated.

Also, the first article I mentioned is a good read too. It is about the liberals taking over the sight of the twin towers.
Same link as above http://www.nypost.com/commentary/commentary.htm
Tuesday, June 21, 2005

WRONG TIME, WRONG PLACE FOR LEFTIES' PC PRATTLE
By ANDREA PEYSER
NEARLY four years after her husband was murdered on 9/11 just because he was American, Loisanne Diehl stood in lower Manhattan, defending her beloved from those who would insist he deserved to die.


34 posted on 06/21/2005 10:04:54 AM PDT by TheForceOfOne (My tagline is currently being blocked by Congressional filibuster for being to harsh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: tcostell
That's the only rational view to take, but since the school board is probably populated with teachers from other districts I wouldn't count on a position too sympathetic to the parents or taxpayers.

This school board is clearly not a patsy board elected primarily with the efforts of the teachers union. Their tough stand on the original letter shows this. They will likely accetpt this new letter though, since a judge would also likely rule that the original statement was ambiguous. I suspect the teachers will not follow this up with any teachers strike though. As a board I would consider any striking teacher at this point as a resignation.

35 posted on 06/21/2005 11:01:03 AM PDT by KC_for_Freedom (Sailing the highways of America, and loving it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA

It appears the growth of vouchers and choice is bearing fruit. The teacher's union will collapse just the dimwit party.


36 posted on 06/21/2005 12:22:59 PM PDT by Temple Owl (19064)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: WhyisaTexasgirlinPA

Hope a teacher in the district doesn't see your post ..You spelled superintendent wrong !!


37 posted on 06/21/2005 12:57:46 PM PDT by Renegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: KC_for_Freedom

I believe teacher strikes are legal in Pennsylvania ( used to be ) for a certain period of time .


38 posted on 06/21/2005 12:59:14 PM PDT by Renegade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Renegade

Haha, did I? Sorry, I was in a hurry this morning - that is no excuse though - I should have been more careful. Thanks for pointing out my error, and I do mean that.....


39 posted on 06/21/2005 3:05:27 PM PDT by WhyisaTexasgirlinPA (Prayers for healing and relief from pain for Cowboy...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative
Accept the letter, abolish the teacher's union and change the law to read that no government or job connected with tax payer dollars may have salaries and benefits exceeding the average wage in the private sector.
40 posted on 06/21/2005 3:07:27 PM PDT by A CA Guy (God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson