Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BLOCKED YET AGAIN:Bush Faces Decision on Bolton Nomination
washingtonpost.com ^ | Tuesday, June 21, 2005; 2:17 AM | LIZ SIDOTI

Posted on 06/21/2005 1:16:45 AM PDT by YoungBlackRepublican

President Bush faces a politically thorny situation _ and stark choices _ now that Senate Democrats twice have blocked John Bolton's confirmation as U.N. ambassador The president could withdraw the nomination, authorize further concessions to Democrats over access to information they seek or bypass lawmakers altogether by appointing the former State Department official to the job temporarily without the Senate's OK. But any of those options could leave the president appearing weak as he confronts sagging poll numbers and fights to stave off a lame-duck label just six months into his final term. "It's time for the Senate to give him an up-or-down vote. Now," the president said.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; blocked; bolton; bush; democrats; filibuster; limpfristed; mcqueeg; nomination; rinoquislings; senate; senatesellout
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,160077,00.html

Fox news is reporting this also...

"It's time for the Senate to give him an up-or-down vote. Now," the president said"

This is the part that errks me the most. If you're so against this nominee then vote him down. But don't do this....

"Sen. Chris Dodd of Connecticut, a leading Democrat in the battle against Bolton, suggested after the vote that any number of "good, strong, tough conservatives" could be confirmed more easily than Bolton.

"I would strongly encourage the administration tonight to move on, to give us another nominee, someone who the administration can support, that we can support here," Dodd said"

(sigh, scratches head) frustrating.......

1 posted on 06/21/2005 1:16:49 AM PDT by YoungBlackRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: YoungBlackRepublican

Didn't the Bork thing bury Bolton already? Sigh, short memories... Why are they even giving this guy a second chance?


2 posted on 06/21/2005 1:28:04 AM PDT by kaotic133
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kaotic133

In addition, Bolton's long record of money laundering and shell company rip-offs should disqualify him from any office of trust. I believe the National Congressional Club is still trying to find out what happened to the $650k that Bolton siphoned off into his pet money tree Jefferson Marketing.


3 posted on 06/21/2005 1:52:50 AM PDT by John Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: YoungBlackRepublican
Sen. Chris Dodd of Connecticut, a leading Democrat in the battle against Bolton, suggested after the vote that any number of "good, strong, tough conservatives" could be confirmed more easily than Bolton.

Bush should take Dodd's advice. Withdraw the Bolton nomination. Replace him with a "good, strong, tough conservative" named Ann Coulter. Now all you liberal whiners, let's have a vote. Up or down. In fact, let's have some hearings. I'd like nothing better than to tune into C-SPAN to see Ms. Coulter chew up and spit out disgraces like Ted Kennedy, Chris Dodd, Hillary Rodham and Patty Murray.

4 posted on 06/21/2005 1:56:12 AM PDT by billclintonwillrotinhell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YoungBlackRepublican

Time to nuke 'em!


5 posted on 06/21/2005 2:15:40 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Deport them all; let Fox sort them out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YoungBlackRepublican
By not going to the mat over his nominees in the last Presidency, Bush has earned this kind of stonewalling.
6 posted on 06/21/2005 2:19:16 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (A faith in Justice, none in "fairness.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Time to nuke 'em!

Past time.

7 posted on 06/21/2005 2:19:38 AM PDT by Graybeard58 (Remember and pray for Spec.4 Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: John Locke
In addition, Bolton's long record of money laundering and shell company rip-offs should disqualify him from any office of trust.

I have not heard anything about this. Please provide a reference.

8 posted on 06/21/2005 2:21:40 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (A faith in Justice, none in "fairness.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: YoungBlackRepublican
Sen. Chris Dodd of Connecticut, a leading Democrat in the battle against Bolton, suggested after the vote that any number of "good, strong, tough conservatives" could be confirmed more easily than Bolton.

Would Keyes take the job again?

9 posted on 06/21/2005 2:22:47 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (A faith in Justice, none in "fairness.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YoungBlackRepublican

Personally, if I'm President Bush, I send a nicely written message on fine stationary to Dodd asking him to please 'go pound sand'. Then, I recess appoint Bolton and hit the road for the 4th.


10 posted on 06/21/2005 2:40:34 AM PDT by SoDak (A million miles away)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoDak

I like your idea best... :o)


11 posted on 06/21/2005 3:03:18 AM PDT by ArkieGirl52
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: John Locke

Source, please ?


12 posted on 06/21/2005 3:34:47 AM PDT by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SoDak

Yep, that will resolve this mess cleanly, but not exactly victoriously.

The worst outcome would be that Bolton doesn't get the job. Maybe the Rats will be strutting their stuff, but our man is in there (recess), and I believe he's the kind of person who will make a definite impact within one year, to the point that he'll get confirmed at the end of his recess term.

I saw McLame on Brit Hume last night. He called on Durbin to apologize, and predicted that would occur by 6/19/05. (The interview was taped a week earlier.) He was then asked about judicial appointments and his "Gang of 14", and he blithly said that his gang would control those appointments, the president would ask for their approval, etc. What a dick! (Couldn't help it folks.)

To say he and his gang have ruined everything for the Repubs is not much of an overstatement. The nuke option is gone because of him.

Frist futilely called for the second Bolton vote, and got hammered. Do you guys remember how happy and confident we were back in February that Frist had the votes, and the nuke, and would surely get nearly everybody confirmed, while the Dems just continued to eat it?

McLame and his gang killed that. What a dick! >8(


13 posted on 06/21/2005 3:45:55 AM PDT by Randy Papadoo (Hey! That's NOT YOUR COOKIE!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: YoungBlackRepublican
President Bush should appoint him during recess. I believe he alluded to this recently.

The president will not suffer if he issues a recess appointment for Bolton. Regardless of what the article writer states Bush is not a "lame duck". This is wishful thinking by the writer and nothing else. The reality is is that the overwhelming majority of voters have no idea who Bolton is or that this debate is taking place. No swing voter will change his future vote with Bolton getting a recess appointment.
14 posted on 06/21/2005 3:46:44 AM PDT by saneright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saneright

"The president will not suffer if he issues a recess appointment for Bolton."

I agree. The ninnies in the media will then provide President Bush ample opportunity to make the point that "the UN needs reform and Bolton is a reformer".


15 posted on 06/21/2005 4:07:43 AM PDT by wingman1 (University of Vietnam 1970)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

I watched Independence Day last night and I believe the proper term is "Nuke the bastards!"


16 posted on 06/21/2005 4:19:00 AM PDT by rabidralph (Michael Jackson will celebrate at Chuck E. Cheese's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: YoungBlackRepublican

I think that, President Bush, just to make a point, should recess appoint Bolton and about 25 judges who have been waiting to run the senate gauntlet.


17 posted on 06/21/2005 4:35:27 AM PDT by Vinnie_Vidi_Vici
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Locke

When you make such an accusation you should provide a link and a credible source.


18 posted on 06/21/2005 4:39:49 AM PDT by MEG33 (GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: saneright

I agree with you, Bolton should be appointed US Ambassador to the UN during recess. Having said that, I can't wait to see future Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearings with Ambassador Bolton being questioned by those dirtballs Dodd, Voinovich, and Biden. Wouldn't miss it for the world.


19 posted on 06/21/2005 4:44:38 AM PDT by moose2004 (You Can Run But You Can't Hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: billclintonwillrotinhell

"Bush should take Dodd's advice. Withdraw the Bolton nomination. Replace him with a "good, strong, tough conservative" named Ann Coulter."


You talk about a wet dream for me....Ann Coulter...hell I'd take her Michelle Malkin....Ann Richards....I could go on...lol...even Hillary....J/k...just had to see if you guys were still paying attention out there!


20 posted on 06/21/2005 4:48:01 AM PDT by YoungBlackRepublican (90 percent of African Americans Vote Democrat...that's not independent thinking...it's sheep like)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson