Skip to comments.
You Saw Them Here First (Copies of Kerry's 180)
Powerline ^
| June 20, 2005
Posted on 06/20/2005 8:24:53 PM PDT by hipaatwo
Via the Freedom of Information Act, a reader obtained copies of the Form 180s that were recently signed by John Kerry to permit, at long last, the release of his military records. I believe there may be a story about this in the New York Sun tomorrow, and no doubt more commentary will be forthcoming over the next few days. Here are the three documents that Kerry signed; on their face, I don't see anything wrong with them, but then, I'm no expert in military personnel records. We look forward to our readers' comments.
Go to the link..there are 3 pages.
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 180; americantraitor; enemywithin; farce; form180; ftardcantusecomputer; kerry; ll; lyingtraitor; militaryrecord; pdfsarehardtouse; sf180; skerry; teresaspoodle; traitor; treason; xeroxessavewriting
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-169 next last
1
posted on
06/20/2005 8:24:53 PM PDT
by
hipaatwo
To: hipaatwo
Someone want to interpret them for us? Anything there?
2
posted on
06/20/2005 8:26:27 PM PDT
by
bnelson44
To: hipaatwo
Not so sure about his "180's" but I sure saw him do a bunch of "360's" while campaigning.
3
posted on
06/20/2005 8:27:12 PM PDT
by
softwarecreator
(Facts are to liberals as holy water is to vampires)
To: hipaatwo
I wonder what freeper will find "it". Like the Freeper that noticed the Microsoft Word "th" that did in Dan Rather, I wonder who will find (if it wasn't removed) the smoking gun...
4
posted on
06/20/2005 8:27:41 PM PDT
by
icwhatudo
(The rino borg...is resistance futile?)
To: All
I posted it to Tonk and Old Sarge in the Canteen. I'm hoping someone can figure them out. I'm clueless.
5
posted on
06/20/2005 8:28:44 PM PDT
by
hipaatwo
(When you're in trouble you want all your friends around you...preferably armed!)
To: hipaatwo
To: hipaatwo
So, the single copy goes to a reporter at the Boston Globe. How convenient...
7
posted on
06/20/2005 8:31:00 PM PDT
by
Born Conservative
("If not us, who? And if not now, when? - Ronald Reagan)
To: hipaatwo
so... nobody else can get a copy, just the Boston Globe reporter Kranish?
8
posted on
06/20/2005 8:31:31 PM PDT
by
Echo Talon
(http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
To: hipaatwo
9
posted on
06/20/2005 8:32:50 PM PDT
by
Ciexyz
(Let us always remember, the Lord is in control.)
To: hipaatwo
Copy 1 he checks the box as the military requester to the Boston Globe.
Copy 2 and 3 he leaves off the requester.
Accident or technicality?
10
posted on
06/20/2005 8:33:17 PM PDT
by
tobyhill
(The war on terrorism is not for the weak!)
To: hipaatwo
It's the same page, 3x, to three different people.Each one emphasizes that it is a "single, one time release". JFnK didn't put the dates of service in, just wrote "11 yrs" where the dates should be put. That seems rather odd, especially when you read the fine print on the docs, they (the military) seem rather big on dates.
11
posted on
06/20/2005 8:34:48 PM PDT
by
blu
(This post edited for brevity.)
To: hipaatwo
Boston Globe, AP and La Times... wow a good list of objective reporters... /sarcasm.
12
posted on
06/20/2005 8:35:19 PM PDT
by
Echo Talon
(http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
To: hipaatwo
The SF 180s reproduced grant permission for a "one-time" release of his records to a reporter from the Boston Globe, a reporter the LA Times & a reporter from AP.
I'd be more impressed if they granted to any & everybody -- which is more or less what Dubya did. Or granted it to John O'Neill & the Wall Street Journal.
The cover up continues, I think.
13
posted on
06/20/2005 8:35:38 PM PDT
by
Tribune7
To: tobyhill
One was for the Boston Globe, one for the Associated Press,and one for the LA Times.
Where are our 180 experts?
14
posted on
06/20/2005 8:37:04 PM PDT
by
blu
(This post edited for brevity.)
To: Echo Talon
---so... nobody else can get a copy, just the Boston Globe reporter Kranish?---
it said "single, one time only", so it sounds like it.
15
posted on
06/20/2005 8:37:48 PM PDT
by
smonk
To: hipaatwo
Kerry only states US Navy but is the Navy Reserves included in the category?
16
posted on
06/20/2005 8:38:17 PM PDT
by
tobyhill
(The war on terrorism is not for the weak!)
To: blu
looks like we are at another roadblock Kerry is now hiding behind these liberal journalists
17
posted on
06/20/2005 8:39:38 PM PDT
by
Echo Talon
(http://echotalon.blogspot.com)
To: tobyhill
I can't tell. I saw Reserves but it wasn't checked.
18
posted on
06/20/2005 8:39:45 PM PDT
by
hipaatwo
(When you're in trouble you want all your friends around you...preferably armed!)
To: blu
I think he wrote "all years," instead of "11 years," but the "a" is small and looks like a dot.
19
posted on
06/20/2005 8:40:39 PM PDT
by
Jedidah
To: hipaatwo
I tried to read them - it's a little rough - but it looks like the letter of the law has been fulfilled.
20
posted on
06/20/2005 8:42:41 PM PDT
by
Old Sarge
(In for a penny, in for a pound, saddlin' up and Baghdad-bound!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-169 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson