Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mac OS on a Dell? Dell in favor, Apple opposed
MacCentral ^ | June 20, 2005 | Tom Krazit

Posted on 06/20/2005 1:08:53 PM PDT by Panerai

If Apple ever decides to let its Mac OS X operating system outside of its confines, the company can count Dell Inc. founder and Chairman Michael Dell as a possible customer.

With the recent news that Apple plans to become a fellow customer of Intel Corp. for x86 processors, Dell has expressed interest in selling Mac OS X-based PCs, he said in an e-mail to Fortune published on the magazine’s Web site Thursday.

“If Apple decides to open the Mac OS to others, we would be happy to offer it to our customers,” Dell wrote in the e-mail. A Dell spokesman confirmed Thursday that the e-mail exchange took place.

Apple, however, is not keen on striking a deal with the world’s largest PC vendor.

“Mac OS X will only run on Macs. Apple has no plans to sell Mac OS X software to run on PCs,” an Apple spokeswoman said in an e-mail response to questions about Dell.

Dell’s interest in Mac OS X raises numerous questions about how such a partnership would work. Dell’s current PC product strategy is famously one-sided: Microsoft Corp.’s Windows operating system and Intel’s processors for all. Dell executives believe this arrangement allows them to keep their operating costs as low as possible.

However, Mac OS X, with its Unix underpinnings and secure reputation, might pique the interests of many IT managers looking for a low-cost PC that is easy to maintain. And Dell’s position as the industry market share leader could expose Mac OS to a much wider range of users.

(Excerpt) Read more at macworld.com ...


TOPICS: Technical
KEYWORDS: apple; dell; godhatesmacs; macintel; onebuttonmouse; osx; slowerandhotter; tiger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last
To: kdot
The Mac was fine. The Dell is fine. Whatever works for you...???MacSnobbery???..Don't flame me; it's just my $0.02.

Huh?? I used to own a Mac ('89), have a Dell ('03) had to switch, b/c of software...if it works it works...No Snobbery inferred/implied :D

41 posted on 06/20/2005 4:27:11 PM PDT by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid, doesn't mean they aren't out to get you :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: SengirV
We're talking OS X, why are you talking LINUX?

Mac OSX is Linux or more correctly BSD with the Mac GUI built on top of it.

42 posted on 06/20/2005 4:39:39 PM PDT by UseYourHead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Mac ping!


43 posted on 06/20/2005 4:55:01 PM PDT by tiamat ("I live in my own little world. But it's okay. They know me here.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kdot

I see more PC Snobbery than Mac Snobbery... Just look at any thread on FR about Apple.


44 posted on 06/20/2005 4:57:00 PM PDT by mwyounce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Wonder Warthog

Good question, one for the more technically minded to answer. Any takers?????????


45 posted on 06/20/2005 6:46:47 PM PDT by pctech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: UseYourHead

Mac OS X != Linux in this regard. You'll do nothing but confuse people if we go down this path.


46 posted on 06/20/2005 7:33:17 PM PDT by SengirV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000; antiRepublicrat; Action-America; eno_; Glenn; bentfeather; BigFinn; Brian Allen; byset; ..
Apple to Dell... no I won't go out with you... no , no, no! A thousand times NO!

ping.

If you want on or off the Mac Ping List, Freepmail me.

47 posted on 06/20/2005 10:35:08 PM PDT by Swordmaker (tagline now open, please ring bell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UseYourHead
"how long before we see MS-Linux?"

right after hells first snow day. if MS office , Exchange, and Visio were ported to Linux MS would create another (albeit small) competitor for desktop business..

48 posted on 06/21/2005 5:42:50 AM PDT by N3WBI3 (Tech thread trolls; no matter how bad your day is at least your not those losers..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JustAnotherOkie

Lets see sell 2% of the PC's out there to run your OS, or have your OS run on oh say 30 to 40% of PC's? Duh.


49 posted on 06/21/2005 5:47:01 AM PDT by Kozak (Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Panerai
Mac OS X will only run on Macs.

That'll be hacked about five minutes out of the gate.

50 posted on 06/21/2005 6:30:05 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

The Intel switch exhibits Jobs' devotion to keeping Apple a hardware company as well as a software company. Assuring everyone that Apple has no interest in licensing its software is a move to assure MicroSloth. Switching processor families is a bet the company manuever. Could be the entree to getting rid of Jobs for good, because such a move is bound to have an impact on Apple hardware sales, and licensing the OS would open up more market share for the OS.


51 posted on 06/21/2005 9:32:46 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (FR profiled updated Tuesday, May 10, 2005. Fewer graphics, faster loading.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: television is just wrong
On top of that, all customer service I understand, is run out of India...

They borught business service back to the US. Also, they are constructing two new large call centers here in Oklahoma City, perhaps they are for consumer... I don't know.

52 posted on 06/21/2005 9:35:19 AM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Echo Talon
It would be a WIN, WIN for Jobs I don't see why he is opposed to it.

Because it's his religion. All his. And Wintel users aren't dumb enough to fall at his feet.

53 posted on 06/21/2005 10:10:57 AM PDT by Hank Rearden (Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts; ShadowAce
Since Apple will be designing their own board, they can do pretty much anything they want with the hardware to keep it all proprietary: special I/O chips (i.e. not consistent with regular wintel boards), different hardware mapping than that used by wintel boards, and so forth.

Windows ultimately _knows_ where to look for ports and ram space and rom space because all the wintel boards are mapped the same way. Apple doesn't have to do _any_ of that.

Look at it another way: WHY would they make software that could be used on _any_ board, just to have idiots start cloning it for everyone? Even with online registration, fingerprinting boards, and stuff, it's just not worth their time and money to combat it for the little profit they'd realize. "You wanna run our software - you gotta buy our board."
54 posted on 06/21/2005 9:05:14 PM PDT by solitas (So what if I support an OS that has fewer flaws than yours? 'Mystic' dual 500 G4's, OSX.4.1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: solitas
Sure, they can do that, but will they?

They had a proprietary motherboard and chipset before, and made a particular effort to standardize it (CHRP), and removed the proprietary ROMs.

Will they now undo all that? Maybe, but I don't think so.

55 posted on 06/22/2005 6:29:57 AM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson