She made five (5) similar remarks to three people on five different occasions. All three testified under oath, in a court of law, under penalty of perjury, and subject to cross examination, to that effect.
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
Don't you have a teensy bit of curiosity why all three testifiers had the last name "Schiavo"?
All were Schiavo's who "suddenly" remembered these remarks seven years AFTER Terri's mysterious collapse and AFTER her husband got the money. All those suddenly remembered remarks were casual, passing comments which were NOT uttered after serious reflection and consideration.
Two other people, one who had NO conflict of interest, testified to casual remarks Terri made which stated the exact OPPOSITE position. You NEVER mention them. Quite disingenuous of you.
She made five (5) similar remarks to three people on five different occasions. All three testified under oath, in a court of law, under penalty of perjury, and subject to cross examination, to that effect.
___Basically unconfirmable testimony. The judge simply decided to accept those views. He could have easily ruled another way.
I regard this as a test case for
true conservative values. Anyone who supports the Michael Schiavo position is a not a conservative, in my opinion, because when there is doubt, such a decision should be resolved in favor of life.