Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hit by friendly fire (RINO Chuck Hagel *TREASON*! Bashes Bush, says we're *LOSING* in Iraq!)
U.S. News & World Report ^ | June 27, 2005 | Kevin Whitelaw

Posted on 06/18/2005 10:07:10 PM PDT by Sir Valentino

Hit by friendly fire

With his polls down, Bush takes flak on Iraq from a host of critics--including some in his own party
By Kevin Whitelaw

Nebraska Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel is angry. He's upset about the more than 1,700 U.S. soldiers killed and nearly 13,000 wounded in Iraq. He's also aggravated by the continued string of sunny assessments from the Bush administration, such as Vice President Dick Cheney's recent remark that the insurgency is in its "last throes." "Things aren't getting better; they're getting worse. The White House is completely disconnected from reality," Hagel tells U.S. News. "It's like they're just making it up as they go along. The reality is that we're losing in Iraq."

That's strikingly blunt talk from a member of the president's party, even one cast as something of a pariah in the GOP because of his early skepticism about the war. "I got beat up pretty good by my own party and the White House that I was not a loyal Republican," he says. Today, he notes, things are changing: "More and more of my colleagues up here are concerned."

Indeed, there are signs that the politics of the Iraq war are being reshaped by the continuing tide of bad news. Take this month in Iraq, with 47 U.S. troops killed in the first 15 days. That's already five more than the toll for the entire month of June last year. With the rate of insurgent attacks near an all-time high and the war's cost set to top $230 billion, more politicians on both sides of the aisle are responding to opinion polls that show a growing number of Americans favoring a withdrawal from Iraq. Republican Sens. Lincoln Chafee and Lindsey Graham have voiced their concerns. And two Republicans, including the congressman who brought "freedom fries" to the Capitol, even joined a pair of Democratic colleagues in sponsoring a bill calling for a troop withdrawal plan to be drawn up by year's end. "I feel confident that the opposition is going to build," says Rep. Ron Paul, the other Republican sponsor and a longtime opponent of the war.

Sagging polls. The measure is not likely to go anywhere, but Hagel calls it "a major crack in the dike." Whether or not that's so, the White House has reason to worry that the assortment of critiques of Bush's wartime performance may be approaching a tipping point. Only 41 percent of Americans now support Bush's handling of the Iraq war, the lowest mark ever in the Associated Press-Ipsos poll. And the Iraq news has combined with a lethargic economy and doubts about the president's Social Security proposals to push Bush's overall approval ratings near all-time lows. For now, most Republicans remain publicly loyal to the White House. "Why would you give your enemies a timetable?" asks House Majority Leader Tom DeLay. "[Bush] doesn't fight the war on news articles or television or on polls."

Still, the Bush administration is planning to hit back, starting this week, with a renewed public-relations push by the president. Bush will host Iraqi Prime Minister Ibrahim Jafari and has scheduled a major speech for June 28, the anniversary of the handover of power to an Iraqi government from U.S. authorities. But Congress's patience could wear very thin going into an election year. "If things don't start to turn around in six months, then it may be too late," says Hagel. "I think it's that serious."

Bush's exit strategy--which depends on a successful Iraqi political process--got a boost last week when Sunni and Shiite politicians ended weeks of wrangling over how to increase Sunni representation on the constitution-writing committee. Now, however, committee members have less than two months before their mid-August deadline. And given how long it took to resolve who gets to draft the document, it's hard to imagine a quick accord on the politically explosive issues they face.

With Ilana Ozernoy and Terence Samuel


TOPICS: Government; US: Nebraska
KEYWORDS: 109th; chuckhagel; hagel; iraq; kmachuck; rino; traitor; treason
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last
To: Sir Valentino

Never underestimate a Republican's ability to forget which team they are on.


61 posted on 06/19/2005 6:30:08 PM PDT by Tall_Texan (Visit Club Gitmo - The World's Only Air-Conditioned Gulag.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145

What did you expect, he's a mclame protege.


62 posted on 06/19/2005 6:34:18 PM PDT by RJS1950 (The rats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tomahawk

We could, if the party heads would put an electable candidate up in his place. Hell, in this state a lot of lame-brain pubs voted for Nelson just because he was a likeable guy and a so-called conservative dem. A lot of republicans in the state have come to consider hagel the droppings out of the ass-end of a donk.


63 posted on 06/19/2005 6:39:04 PM PDT by RJS1950 (The rats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: RJS1950

I'm beginning to think that even the Hildabeast is better on national security than Mr. Hagel.


64 posted on 06/19/2005 7:36:52 PM PDT by tomahawk (http://tomahawkblog.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Sir Valentino
My given name is Charles but I NEVER let anyone call me "Chuck" mainly because I wouild never want to be associated with Dumb Chucks like this. President? Hah!
Not a chance.
65 posted on 06/19/2005 7:54:34 PM PDT by Tunehead54 (In memory of our bravest in armed service to our nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo

Hagel should consider that there would be well fewer than 1700 dead American soldiers in Iraq if it weren't for TRAITORS aiding and abetting the enemy. At one point we had them in fear and on the run. Now we have to explain that we've virtuously provided them two fruits in their daily diet. Next thing you know Khaddafy will be rethinking his no more WMD concessions. With every anti-admin. 'rat and RINO public criticism, and the administration's milquetoast responses, more and more American soldiers' and Iraqi lives are at risk.


66 posted on 06/19/2005 8:52:07 PM PDT by ntnychik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: ntnychik

It's Vietnam: Chuck Hagel is doing the work Osama bin Laden has ordered him to do: win domestically what the enemy loses on the battlefield.


67 posted on 06/19/2005 8:55:10 PM PDT by PhilDragoo (Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: tomahawk

All I know is if a Democratic Senator said point blank "We are losing in Iraq," we would be crying treason and rightfully so. It seems like all of a sudden our "Republican" Congress is trying to outdo the Democrats in treasonous remarks and defeatisms. If they keep this up, they will lose control for sure in 2006 because people like me won't show up to the polls . With friends like that, who needs enemies?


68 posted on 06/20/2005 10:46:43 AM PDT by arizonaconservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Sir Valentino

It's called sedition, and he should be tried for it.


69 posted on 06/20/2005 10:51:08 AM PDT by Yosemitest (It's simple, fight or die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Valentino
I can think of a legal trial that needs to be done.

THE SEDITION ACT OF JULY 14, 1798


70 posted on 06/20/2005 10:53:55 AM PDT by Yosemitest (It's simple, fight or die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #71 Removed by Moderator

To: ConservativeAllTheWay

TROL alert....what a dumb ass statement....get out of here and go raise funds for your hero hagel...


72 posted on 08/20/2005 3:29:27 PM PDT by RVN Airplane Driver (Thanks America for not slapping us in the face again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Sir Valentino

What an a$$#01e.


73 posted on 08/20/2005 3:46:10 PM PDT by Manic_Episode (OUT OF ORDER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson