Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House Passes Bill to Slash Funds to U.N.
AP by Yahoo ^ | 6/17/2005 | JIM ABRAMS (AP)

Posted on 06/17/2005 12:10:30 PM PDT by SamFromLivingston

Edited on 06/17/2005 2:59:48 PM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

WASHINGTON - Culminating years of frustration with the performance and behavior of the United Nations, the House voted Friday to slash U.S. contributions to the world body if it does not substantially change the way it operates.

The 221-184 vote, which came despite a Bush administration warning that such a move could actually sabotage reform efforts, was a strong signal from Congress that a policy of persuasion wasn't enough to straighten out the U.N.

"We have had enough waivers, enough resolutions, enough statements," said House International Relations Committee Chairman Henry Hyde, R-Ill., the author of the legislation. "It's time we had some teeth in reform."

The legislation would withhold half of U.S. dues to the U.N.'s general budget if the organization did not meet a list of demands for change. Failure to comply would also result in U.S. refusal to support expanded and new peacekeeping missions. The bill's prospects in the Senate are uncertain.

Just prior to the final vote, the House rejected, 216-190, an alternative offered by the top Democrat on the International Relations Committee, Tom Lantos of California, that also would have outlined U.N. reforms but would have left it to the discretion of the secretary of state whether to withhold U.S. payments.

During the two days of debate, legislators discussed the seating of such human rights abusers as Cuba and Sudan on the U.N. Commission on Human Rights and the oil-for-food program that became a source of up to $10 billion in illicit revenue for former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein.

Rep. Jeff Fortenberry, R-Neb., won backing for an amendment under which the United States would use its influence to ensure that any member engaged in acts of genocide or crimes against humanity would lose its U.N. membership and face arms and trade embargoes.

Hyde was joined by lawmakers with a litany of complaints against what they said was the U.N.'s lavish spending, its coddling of rogue regimes, its anti-America, anti-Israel bias and recent scandals such as the mismanagement of the oil-for-food program in Iraq and the sexual misconduct of peacekeepers.

The administration on Thursday had urged the Republican-led House to reconsider the legislation. The administration said in a statement that it is actively engaged in U.N. reform, and the Hyde bill "could detract from and undermine our efforts."

Eight former U.S. ambassadors to the United Nations, including Madeleine Albright and Jeane Kirkpatrick, also weighed in, telling lawmakers in a letter that withholding of dues would "create resentment, build animosity and actually strengthen opponents of reform."

U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan expressed support earlier this week for another congressional effort to bring about U.N. reform. A task force led by former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, a Republican, and former Senate Majority leader George Mitchell, a Democrat, recommended such changes as setting up an independent auditing board and weighted voting on financial issues for members who contribute more to the budget.

Also Thursday, the administration supported a measured expansion of the Security Council, but said widespread reform of the United Nations takes precedence.

"We are not prepared to have Security Council reform sprint out ahead of the other extremely important reforms that have to take place," Rice said at a news conference. She cited management, peace-building and halting the proliferation of dangerous weapons technology.

The bill, with amendments, lists 46 reforms sought. They include cutting the public information budget by 20 percent, establishing an independent oversight board and an ethics office, and denying countries that violate human rights from serving on human rights commissions.

The secretary of state would have to certify that 32 of the 39 reforms have been met by September 2007, and all 39 by the next year, to avoid a withdrawal of 50 percent of assessed dues.

U.S.-assessed dues account for about 22 percent of the U.N.'s $2 billion annual general budget.

The financial penalties would not apply to the U.N.'s voluntarily funded programs, which include UNICEF and the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government
KEYWORDS: 109th; un; unreform
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-138 next last
To: SamFromLivingston

Good. This is *good* news.


41 posted on 06/17/2005 1:34:07 PM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamFromLivingston

Great way to finish Friday!


42 posted on 06/17/2005 1:57:22 PM PDT by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamFromLivingston

Part way there...Now..bring in the D-9 CATs


43 posted on 06/17/2005 2:27:45 PM PDT by joesnuffy (Taglines often reveal a lot about the inner person...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamFromLivingston

44 posted on 06/17/2005 2:30:10 PM PDT by blackie (Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasConservative46

This isn't so much a slash payments bill as it is a reform bill. Go read the bill. Do you really want said reforms? From Henry Lamb's "Rethink U.N. Reform": "The reform measures proposed by the Hyde bill do nothing to limit the function of the U.N. Instead, they work to expand the governing power of the U.N., by attempting to squeeze out some of the inefficiency. The proposed reforms actually strengthen the U.N.'s power to govern."


45 posted on 06/17/2005 2:30:53 PM PDT by candeee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: TexasConservative46

Ron Paul isn't interested in reforming the UN, he wants to get rid of it altogether.


46 posted on 06/17/2005 2:31:37 PM PDT by dfwgator (Flush Newsweek!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Darth Reagan

ping


47 posted on 06/17/2005 2:31:38 PM PDT by marblehead17 (I love it when a plan comes together.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamFromLivingston

Yeeeeehhhhhhiiii -Now kick their money grabbing butts outa the US altogether.


48 posted on 06/17/2005 2:32:24 PM PDT by sandydipper (Less government is best government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamFromLivingston

I love how they are thumbing their nose at the White House. the people have spoken!


49 posted on 06/17/2005 2:32:32 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamFromLivingston

http://www.house.gov/paul/tst/tst2005/tst061305.htm


NeoCon Global Government

June 13, 2005

This week Congress will vote on a bill to expand the power of the United Nations beyond the dreams of even the most ardent left-wing, one-world globalists. But this time the UN power grabbers aren’t European liberals; they are American neo-conservatives, who plan to use the UN to implement their own brand of world government.

The “United Nations Reform Act of 2005” masquerades as a bill that will cut US dues to the United Nations by 50% if that organization does not complete a list of 39 reforms. On the surface any measure that threatens to cut funding to the United Nations seems very attractive, but do not be fooled: in this case reform “success” will be worse than failure. The problem is in the supposed reforms themselves-- specifically in the policy changes this bill mandates.

The proposed legislation opens the door for the United Nations to routinely become involved in matters that have never been part of its charter. Specifically, the legislation redefines terrorism very broadly for the UN’s official purposes-- and charges it to take action on behalf of both governments and international organizations.

What does this mean? The official adoption of this definition by the United Nations would have the effect of making resistance to any government or any international organization an international crime. It would make any attempt to overthrow a government an international causus belli for UN military action. Until this point a sovereign government retained the legal right to defend against or defeat any rebellion within its own territory. Now any such activity would constitute justification for United Nations action inside that country. This could be whenever any splinter group decides to resist any regime-- regardless of the nature of that regime.

What if this were in place when the Contras were fighting against the Marxist regime in Nicaragua? Or when the Afghan mujahadeen was fighting against the Soviet-installed government in the 1980s? Or during the Warsaw Ghetto uprising? The new message is clear: resistance-- even resistance to the UN itself-- is futile. Why does every incumbent government, no matter how bad, deserve UN military assistance to quell domestic unrest?

This new policy is given teeth by creating a “Peacebuilding Commission,” which will serve as the implementing force for the internationalization of what were formerly internal affairs of sovereign nations. This Commission will bring together UN Security Council members, major donors, major troop contributing countries, appropriate United Nations organizations, the World Bank, and the International Monetary Fund among others. This new commission will create the beginning of a global UN army. It will claim the right to intervene in any conflict anywhere on the globe, bringing the World Bank and the IMF formally into the picture as well. It is a complete new world order, but undertaken with the enthusiastic support of many of those who consider themselves among the most strident UN critics.

Conservatives who have been critical of the UN in the past have enthusiastically embraced this bill and the concept of UN reform. But what is the desired end of “UN reform”? The UN is an organization that was designed to undermine sovereignty and representative government. It is unelected and unaccountable to citizens by its very design. Will UN reform change anything about the fact that its core mission is objectionable? Do honest UN critics really want an expanded UN that functions more “efficiently”?

The real question is whether we should redouble our efforts to save a failed system, or admit its failures-- as this legislation does-- and recognize that the only reasonable option is to cease participation without further costs to the United States in blood, money, and sovereignty. Do not be fooled: it is impossible to be against the United Nations and to support “reform” of the United Nations. The only true reform of the United Nations is for the US to withdraw immediately.


50 posted on 06/17/2005 2:35:22 PM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamFromLivingston

Too much good news today, first the meat axe hit PBS and now the UN has it's come uppins.


51 posted on 06/17/2005 2:37:32 PM PDT by Amish with an attitude (An armed society is a polite society)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamFromLivingston

52 posted on 06/17/2005 2:39:48 PM PDT by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
" The secretary of state would have to certify that 32 of the 39 reforms have been met by September 2007, and all 39 by the next year, to avoid a withdrawal of 50 percent of assessed dues"

That sounds pretty level headed, measured and responsible. I’m sure the partisan media will have nothing bad to say about it. [snicker]

53 posted on 06/17/2005 2:44:23 PM PDT by elfman2 (This space is intentionally left blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Bacon Man
Cool!

Now if we could stop financing countries that hate us
and pouring cash down the toilet that is Africa..

But this is a good start!

54 posted on 06/17/2005 2:49:34 PM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: SamFromLivingston

Let's hope they have the balls to implement this.


55 posted on 06/17/2005 2:52:00 PM PDT by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamFromLivingston

I love it...........


56 posted on 06/17/2005 2:55:16 PM PDT by Unicorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elfman2

A couple of points:

The House of Representatives holds the purse strings. Whether the Senate or the Administration likes it or not, not one penny can be appropriated for the UN that doesn't pass the House.


Unfortunately, the House doesn't have a say in another pressing matter that is dangerously looming: the world socialist UN wetdream called 'the Law of the Sea Treaty' or 'LOST'.

Killed by the Reagan administration, it is back in spades, and is supported by the President and key Senators. Because it is a treaty, the House has no say in it at all.

For the first time, the UN will have taxing authority under this awful treaty, as well as giving that collection of Third World Arabist thugs virtual control over about 70% of the surface of the planet, as well as its airspace and seabeds.

Republicans better wake up fast to this threat and apply maximum pressure to stop it.


57 posted on 06/17/2005 2:58:50 PM PDT by EternalVigilance ('Quality of Life': another name for the slippery slope into barbarism...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: SamFromLivingston
The HYDE-PENCE U.N. Reform ACt is a great piece of Legislation.It must pass the Senate.
58 posted on 06/17/2005 2:59:08 PM PDT by Gipper08 (Mike Pence in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamFromLivingston

I think Mike Pence was instrumental in this and co-sponsered part of it. Not sure why he isn't mentioned in this article. Mike Pence in 08! (The non establishment government slashing candidate)


59 posted on 06/17/2005 3:00:17 PM PDT by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/canadahealthcare.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamFromLivingston; Howlin; Timesink; Utah Girl; hosepipe; backhoe; FITZ; Happy2BMe; ...
Image hosted by TinyPic.com

60 posted on 06/17/2005 3:10:06 PM PDT by ATOMIC_PUNK (secus acutulus exspiro ab Acheron bipes actio absol ab Acheron supplico)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-138 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson