Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
To: LibWhacker
Science has now proved predestination... but there's still no god.
To: LibWhacker
Whewwww. Thanks, I have always worried about that.
To: LibWhacker
"Whoa, that's heavy."
4 posted on
06/17/2005 12:09:32 PM PDT by
dfwgator
(Flush Newsweek!)
To: LibWhacker
Don't tell this to the whales in San Francisco........
5 posted on
06/17/2005 12:09:34 PM PDT by
AxelPaulsenJr
(Pray Daily For Our Troops and President Bush)
To: LibWhacker
You can't travel into the past. You can only travel into the future.
To: LibWhacker
Clearly, the present never is changed by mischievous time-travellers: people don't suddenly fade into the ether because a rerun of events has prevented their births - that much is obvious.What a moronic statement. I stopped reading after this bit of tripe.
7 posted on
06/17/2005 12:10:47 PM PDT by
SengirV
To: LibWhacker
Nothing new, sci-fi authors have been saying it for years
8 posted on
06/17/2005 12:10:56 PM PDT by
commonasdirt
(Reading DU so you won't hafta)
To: LibWhacker
Can I travel back in time and invest in cattle futures?
9 posted on
06/17/2005 12:11:46 PM PDT by
2banana
(My common ground with terrorists - They want to die for Islam, and we want to kill them.)
To: LibWhacker
So basically someone with amnesia can destroy the known universe. I suppose a new slogan like "Knowledge is impotence" is in order.
16 posted on
06/17/2005 12:16:15 PM PDT by
Ragnorak
To: LibWhacker
I never was comfortable with the idea of an infinite number of possible universes resulting from time travel to the past.
17 posted on
06/17/2005 12:16:16 PM PDT by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink.)
To: LibWhacker
New model 'permits time travel' I used to put together models when I was a kid. They always looked better on the box than they did in reality.
20 posted on
06/17/2005 12:17:15 PM PDT by
Prince Caspian
(Don't ask if it's risky... Ask if the reward is worth the risk)
To: LibWhacker
So if your father goes missing at some point and you can't remember where you were or what you were doing at some time when he was missing it is possible to go back in time and kill him, otherwise there is no possiblity that some dope can go back and save JFK only to see a nuclear war start between the US and USSR.
21 posted on
06/17/2005 12:17:27 PM PDT by
Better Dead Than Red
(Davis College Republicans (Best Party on Campus))
To: LibWhacker
Ok, now where can I get my hands on a Tardis?
28 posted on
06/17/2005 12:19:43 PM PDT by
exile
(Exile - Helen Thomas tried to lure me into her Gingerbread House.)
To: LibWhacker
You mean I can go back in time and kick the school bully in the nuts and not have to worry that I would change history?
Awesome!
Sign me up!
29 posted on
06/17/2005 12:20:07 PM PDT by
Radioactive
(I'm on the radio..so I'm radioactive)
To: LibWhacker
Does this mean that if Darth Vader had done a lot more faster-than-light travel than his son Luke, that Luke would have been younger than his dad and .... ah if he.... ah I mean the dad had killed the ah no... um the younger guy would have eh... becau...
31 posted on
06/17/2005 12:21:47 PM PDT by
TomasUSMC
(FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
To: LibWhacker
Does this mean that if Darth Vader had done a lot more faster-than-light travel than his son Luke, that Luke would have been younger than his dad and .... ah if he.... ah I mean the dad had killed the ah no... um the younger guy would have eh... becau...
32 posted on
06/17/2005 12:22:04 PM PDT by
TomasUSMC
(FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
To: LibWhacker
Clearly, the present never is changed by mischievous time-travellers: people don't suddenly fade into the ether because a rerun of events has prevented their births - that much is obvious. No it isn't because if the past was changed we'd never know. The new past would seemlessly become our past and anyone "erased" would never have existed.
34 posted on
06/17/2005 12:23:52 PM PDT by
Junior
(“Even if you are one-in-a-million, there are still 6,000 others just like you.”)
To: LibWhacker
Does this mean that if Darth Vader had done a lot more faster-than-light travel than his son Luke, that Luke would have been younger than his dad and .... ah if he.... ah I mean the dad had killed the ah no... um the younger guy would have eh... becau...
35 posted on
06/17/2005 12:24:07 PM PDT by
TomasUSMC
(FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
Anyone remember
Cryptozoic?Clearly, the present never is changed by mischievous time-travellers: people don't suddenly fade into the ether because a rerun of events has prevented their births - that much is obvious.
Hmmm... I still don't understand; If someone went back and killed Marx's grandparents, Marx's contemporaries wouldn't suddenly see him "fade into the ether." He just simply would never have existed for them. And we here in the 21st century wouldn't be aware that anything amiss had happened either. In fact, couldn't time travelers be traveling backward in time constantly killing people whose offspring they don't like -- thereby instantly wiping out our memories of those people and anything they might have accomplished during their lifetimes? I just wish they'd get around to Stalin, Mao and Hitler!
To: LibWhacker
The aliens said that you can travel forward in time, but not backwards...
39 posted on
06/17/2005 12:26:25 PM PDT by
evets
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson