[RegulatorCountry]

Science has now proved predestination... but there's still no god.

[Mikey_1962]

Whewwww. Thanks, I have always worried about that.

[dfwgator]

"Whoa, that's heavy."

[AxelPaulsenJr]

Don't tell this to the whales in San Francisco........

[<1/1,000,000th%]

You can't travel into the past. You can only travel into the future.

[SengirV]

Clearly, the present never is changed by mischievous time-travellers: people don't suddenly fade into the ether because a rerun of events has prevented their births - that much is obvious.

What a moronic statement. I stopped reading after this bit of tripe.

[commonasdirt]

Nothing new, sci-fi authors have been saying it for years

[2banana]

Can I travel back in time and invest in cattle futures?

[Ragnorak]

So basically someone with amnesia can destroy the known universe. I suppose a new slogan like "Knowledge is impotence" is in order.

[R. Scott]

I never was comfortable with the idea of an infinite number of possible universes resulting from time travel to the past.

[Prince Caspian]

New model 'permits time travel'

I used to put together models when I was a kid. They always looked better on the box than they did in reality.

[Better Dead Than Red]

So if your father goes missing at some point and you can't remember where you were or what you were doing at some time when he was missing it is possible to go back in time and kill him, otherwise there is no possiblity that some dope can go back and save JFK only to see a nuclear war start between the US and USSR.

[exile]

Ok, now where can I get my hands on a Tardis?

[Radioactive]

You mean I can go back in time and kick the school bully in the nuts and not have to worry that I would change history?

Awesome!

Sign me up!

[TomasUSMC]

Does this mean that if Darth Vader had done a lot more faster-than-light travel than his son Luke, that Luke would have been younger than his dad and .... ah if he.... ah I mean the dad had killed the ah no... um the younger guy would have eh... becau...

[TomasUSMC]

Does this mean that if Darth Vader had done a lot more faster-than-light travel than his son Luke, that Luke would have been younger than his dad and .... ah if he.... ah I mean the dad had killed the ah no... um the younger guy would have eh... becau...

[Junior]

Clearly, the present never is changed by mischievous time-travellers: people don't suddenly fade into the ether because a rerun of events has prevented their births - that much is obvious.

No it isn't because if the past was changed we'd never know. The new past would seemlessly become our past and anyone "erased" would never have existed.

[TomasUSMC]

Does this mean that if Darth Vader had done a lot more faster-than-light travel than his son Luke, that Luke would have been younger than his dad and .... ah if he.... ah I mean the dad had killed the ah no... um the younger guy would have eh... becau...

[LibWhacker]

Anyone remember Cryptozoic?

Clearly, the present never is changed by mischievous time-travellers: people don't suddenly fade into the ether because a rerun of events has prevented their births - that much is obvious.

Hmmm... I still don't understand; If someone went back and killed Marx's grandparents, Marx's contemporaries wouldn't suddenly see him "fade into the ether." He just simply would never have existed for them. And we here in the 21st century wouldn't be aware that anything amiss had happened either. In fact, couldn't time travelers be traveling backward in time constantly killing people whose offspring they don't like -- thereby instantly wiping out our memories of those people and anything they might have accomplished during their lifetimes? I just wish they'd get around to Stalin, Mao and Hitler!

[evets]

The aliens said that you can travel forward in time, but not backwards...