Posted on 06/17/2005 8:41:18 AM PDT by blam
. . . and churn up big waves, too
Sid Perkins
From New Orleans, at the Joint Assembly of the American Geophysical Union
As Hurricane Ivan approached the U.S. Gulf Coast last September, it passed right over an array of seafloor sensors. The network detected the largest wave ever measured by instruments—one that towered more than 27 meters from trough to crest.
The 50-kilometer-wide group of 14 instruments was deployed in May 2004 to measure currents on the ocean floor, says William J. Teague, an oceanographer at the Naval Research Laboratory at Bay St. Louis, Miss. Late on the evening of Sept. 15, Ivan—moving northward at a pace of about 18 kilometers per hour and packing winds of around 200 km/hr—swept across the array over a period of several hours.
The seafloor instruments were set up to take pressure data during 8.5-minute intervals every 8 hours. As it happened, no sensors were making measurements when the eye of the hurricane was directly overhead. However, sensors did record the passing of massive waves before and after the hurricane moved through the array. During one of the data-gathering intervals, waves that often reached heights of 20 m were passing over one sensor every 10 seconds, says Teague. The largest wave in that train measured 27.7 m from peak to trough.
Computer models suggest that the storm's strongest winds—those in the wall of the hurricane's eye—could have spawned waves up to 40 m high.
Hurricane Ping.
So that's what happened it I-10 bridge...........
I wish they'd use real numbers when reporting this stuff.
Interesting hurricane information!
Here is nonsubscriber article:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,11069-1654539,00.html
I have two meters on the back of my house, one electric and one gas. They are about 8 inches across. so doing the math tells me the 27 meter wave was about 18 feet.
27.7 meters equals 0.138 furlongs
Sebastien Junger (author of "The Perfect Storm"), does a great job describing in laymen's terms, the theoretical maximum heights of waves. I love the sea, but wouldn't want to be anywhere near a 40-meter wave!
That's helpful, because my speedometer reads in furlongs per fortnight.
27.7 meters is 60.59 cubits
27 meters --- approximately 71 feet.
No, it is not.
.."Surfin' Safari".."Catch a wave and your sittin' on top of the world"..BUMP
How many cubits in a bit?
Unless you are talking about Furlong, Pennsylvania. The zip code there is 18925, divide that by their area code (which I don't have handy) and you will get the proper measurement.
LOL. That works for me.
Correction --- 27 meters is about 81 feet. That's
a big wave.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.