Replies

Paul Johnson in a brilliant commentary, points out Europe had turned its back both on the spiritual heritage that made it great and scorns the future by rejecting the free markets that make genuine human diversity and human liberty possible. The EU is rightly, the symbolic corpse of a dying continent. It is a short distance removed from the "Europe Of The Fatherlands" held by the French statesman Charles DeGaulle, who envisioned Europe as a grand symphony of different peoples contributing to a better and freer future. Which is the exactly opposite of the monoform soft totalitarian Europe willed out of Brussels today. Unless Europe's elites appreciate the need to combine the wisdom of the past with the lessons of the present, the European dream will die as it should, aborning.

(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)

I only partialy agree with this analysis.It is globaly correct but you must keep in mind that debate exist in some european countries.It would be important to wonder what part
play the Churches in that picture.
I would prefer to speak of crisis(a big crisis)instead of totalitarianism.But certainly there is a risk of totalitarianism.
Concerning Ch.De Gaulle i think he is a part of the problem!
He was an old nationalist who called communists in his government after WW2...It seems that W.CHURCHIL,F.ROOSEVELT...EISENHOWER did not appreciate him.
His old-fashioned nationalism prevent him to choose between USA and USSR.He was the first to recognize CHINA of MAO TZE TOUNG...he took some distances with USA and tooke FRANCE out from OTAN.He made a stupid declaration about freedom in PNOM PENH as he left Asia to communism...The algerian war was a fiasco...
From a long time FRANCE is sick of his history.But the problem is not the same in the others european countries.That's why i could have some reservation about global judments on Europe

MORE:

The EU's economic philosophy, insofar as it has one, is epitomized by one word: "convergence." The aim is to make all national economies identical with the perfect model. This, as it turns out, is actually the perfect formula for stagnation. What makes the capitalist system work, what keeps economies dynamic, is precisely nonconformity, the new, the unusual, the eccentric, the egregious, the innovative, springing from the inexhaustible inventiveness of human nature. Capitalism thrives on the absence of rules or the ability to circumvent them.
Hence it is not surprising that Europe, which grew rapidly in the 1960s and 1970s, before the EU got going, has slowly lost pace since Brussels took over its direction and imposed convergence. It is now stagnant. Growth rates of over 2% are rare, except in Britain, which was Thatcherized in the 1980s and has since followed the American model of free markets. Slow or nil growth, aggravated by the power of the unions, fits well with the Brussels system and imposes further restraints on economic dynamism: Short working hours and huge social security costs that have produced high unemployment, over 10% in France and higher in Germany than at any time since the Great Depression which brought Hitler to power.

It is natural that high and chronic unemployment generates a depressive anger which finds many expressions. One, in Europe today, is anti-Semitism and anti-Americanism. Another is exceptionally low birthrates, lower in Europe than anywhere else in the world except Japan. If present trends continue, the population of Europe (excluding the British Isles) will be less than the United States by midcentury--under 400 million, with the over-65s constituting one-third of that.

The rise of anti-Americanism, a form of irrationalism deliberately whipped up by Messrs. Schröder and Chirac, who believe it wins votes, is particularly tragic, for the early stages of the EU had their roots in admiration of the American way of doing things and gratitude for the manner in which the U.S. had saved Europe first from Nazism, then (under President Harry Truman) from the Soviet Empire--by the Marshall Plan in 1947 and the creation of NATO in 1949.

Europe's founding fathers--Monnet himself, Robert Schumann in France, Alcide de Gasperi in Italy and Konrad Adenauer in Germany--were all fervently pro-American and anxious to make it possible for European populations to enjoy U.S.-style living standards. Adenauer in particular, assisted by his brilliant economics minister Ludwig Erhardt, rebuilt Germany's industry and services, following the freest possible model. This was the origin of the German "economic miracle," in which U.S. ideas played a determining part. The German people flourished as never before in their history, and unemployment was at record low levels. The decline of German growth and the present stagnation date from the point at which her leaders turned away from America and followed the French "social market" model.