Posted on 06/16/2005 11:37:16 PM PDT by bd476
Edited on 06/16/2005 11:53:39 PM PDT by Sidebar Moderator. [history]
A strong earthquake occurred at 06:21:45 (UTC) on Friday, June 17, 2005. The magnitude 6.9 event has been located OFF THE COAST OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA. (This event has been reviewed by a seismologist.)
Magnitude 6.9 Date-Time Friday, June 17, 2005 at 06:21:45 (UTC) = Coordinated Universal Time Thursday, June 16, 2005 at 10:21:45 PM = local time at epicenter
Location 40.605°N, 126.284°W Depth 45 km (28.0 miles) set by location program Region OFF THE COAST OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA Distances 171 km (106 miles) W (272°) from Ferndale, CA 172 km (107 miles) W (281°) from Petrolia, CA 176 km (109 miles) W (266°) from Humboldt Hill, CA 180 km (112 miles) W (264°) from Eureka, CA 458 km (285 miles) NW (315°) from San Francisco City Hall, CA
Location Uncertainty Error estimate not available Parameters Nst=033, Nph=033, Dmin=217.5 km, Rmss=0.94 sec, Gp=202°, M-type=moment magnitude (Mw), Version=1 Source West Coast and Alaska Tsunami Warning Center/NOAA/NWS
Event ID at00000366
I guess I owe you a beer then. No problem. I believe I have some.... I know I bought some. It better be in the fridge and not in the truck that will create warm skunk pi$$ out of it. Pfffft.
How come you choose to respond to some posters and ignore my questions?
The faults are left over from the opening of the Atlantic.
I didn't realize you or your colleagues were there! LOL. Sometimes you can make assertions that are based as much on assumptions as those you see as abject kooks.
I think that complexities abound in such subject areas sooooo much that even experts are at risk regarding their even most cherished assumptions.
What do I know of such things? Not much. I do collect puzzle pieces. I post those I find interesting. I know I can count on you to be a quick and ready filter in this subject area. Whether your filter truly turns out to be 1,000% more accurate than mine remains to be seen.
I wouldn't be surprised to see some more very interesting quakes soonish. No big supernatural discernment or anything. Just a slight hunch. We shall see. I think the experts prognostications are probably few standard deviations more accurate than my SLIGHT hunches.
But, even the strangest of them are interesting. Who knows what the future holds, but God.
BTW, what's the status of the character with all the fancy calculations and his quake predictions? Seems like there's 2 or 3 that get reported. I forget which one has had some hits and a miss.
BTW, I wouldn't risk a great deal trying to psych out Quix's psychology. Some of the best professors in the country didn't get very far with that effort! LOL.
Thx.
LOL I noticed that years ago.
Mt. Diablo is always in the trio.
Given the big one up north and the big one down south . . . perhaps it could be said that God seems to be bookending California and the 'beloved' San Andres?
Interesting.
THANKS.
From how I understand it:
The earthquake appears on the list.
Then later is reveiwed by an official siesmoligist who then will change the earthquake post if the Mag. was higher/lower or a non event.
BTTT!
Another one will be happening within 24 hours or so, I bet.
That's good advice. That and earthquake proof.
We postponed any more big earthquakes so that your visit will be relatively calm and quiet.
All is quiet last night into the wee hours of the morning. Hope the calm continues. Thanks for asking. :-)
Oceanperch, my sister and hubby have a home in Depot Bay. Probably about the same height as yours. Lovely area.
a great view of the Paciifc. I think a large wave would have to work hard to make it up that high.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.